ACE Lab Tech Week is almost here! ⏳ Take a chance to dive into the latest data recovery trends, real cases, and expert insights! Join us now 👉 https://www.acelab.eu.com/acelab_techweek_2026.php
🎉4❤1👍1

Channel
@ACE_Lab
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,122subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001343942152 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ACE_Lab |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ACE_Lab |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:10 | 1,122 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 1,121 | -1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:40 | 1,122 | -5 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 18:14 | 1,127 | -1 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 1,128 | +1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 1,127 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 1,130 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 1,135 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 1,130 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 1,126 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 1,124 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 1,120 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 1,119 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 1,118 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 1,111 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 1,111 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
150 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 57 | 38.0% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 29.3% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 11.3% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 10.7% | |
| 🎉 | 12 | 8.00% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 2.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ACE Lab Tech Week is almost here! ⏳ Take a chance to dive into the latest data recovery trends, real cases, and expert insights! Join us now 👉 https://www.acelab.eu.com/acelab_techweek_2026.php
🎉4❤1👍1
The new PC-3000 Flash software update version 9.4.6 is now available!🔥 This release delivers a broader resource base, new operation modes, and built-in Solution Database integration. We've also added fresh XORs and advanced ReadRetries for the latest Intel and Samsung memory chips, giving you the power to tackle complex data recovery cases that were previously out of reach. Check out the full article
🔥4❤3🤩1
Previously, retrieving data from USB SSDs meant risky and time-consuming soldering of SATA connectors. For SSDs with NVMe (PCIe) interface, such soldering may cause instability during further data recovery processes. With the latest PC‑3000 SSD Software Update (Ver. 3.9.8, included in the PC‑3000 7.9.9), you can connect native USB SSDs directly without soldering. Simply plug in the drive and work with it in Standard…
🔥6👏4👍2
Every day, you face the impossible. Drives that have been through rough physical damage or critical failure. Cases that seemed “hopeless” — but you brought data back. Welcome to the PC-3000 Data Recovery Contest dedicated to the most complex physically damaged cases you've successfully handled! Share recovery stories that pushed your limits: drives with fire/water/other physical impact, damaged platters and control…
❤4🔥3🤩3🎉2
How to recover data from a huge RAID? Large storage systems are usually built from several reasonably sized RAIDs. But sometimes all drives are combined into one massive array. The bigger the storage, the higher the chance of something unusual. We handled a 96-drive stripe across three RAID-6 arrays with an uncommon XOR-RS distribution. In such rare configurations, tools relying on fully automated modes often fail…
🔥8👏2
The highly anticipated in‑person PC‑3000 Data Recovery Training was held in the US, and it turned out to be an incredible event! Hosted at the fantastic facility of our trusted partner, Teel Technologies USA, in Norwalk, CT this special combo course on HDD and SSD data recovery drew passionate professionals from across the country - all motivated to level up their skills. The good news!🔥 More PC‑3000 training is a…
❤6🎉4👍2👏1
The new PC-3000 software update version 7.9.9 is now officially released!🔥 PC-3000 7.9.9 Data Extractor version 6.9.6 PC-3000 SSD 3.9.8 With this PC‑3000 update, you get support for new drive families, refined recovery algorithms, and new features of the Data Extractor – to extract even more data than before. Key highlights: expanded support for Maxio SATA controllers (MAS0902, DM918, MAS1102, DM928) as well as ex…
❤12👍7
We're excited to share that ACE Lab recently participated in the 11th International Police Expo, where our trusted partner Zoom Group Company showcased PC‑3000 solutions to law enforcement professionals and digital forensic experts from across India and around the globe. Live demonstrations of the PC‑3000 Mobile PRO drew visitors to our booth, where they experienced its latest innovation - the Accelerator Software …
🔥10👏1
The final chapter of our TRIMed SSD series is here! 🔥 USB SSDs are appearing in labs more and more frequently – and in many cases, they've been formatted to the point where standard recovery tools struggle to find anything at all. The catch? These aren't ordinary USB flash drives. They're fully-fledged SSDs equipped with TRIM, wear leveling, and background cleanup routines. And that means time is not on your side a…
👏7❤3👍1🔥1
The year's top data recovery event is coming! 💫 Join us for ACE Lab Tech Week 2026, a unique 4-day conference, packed with dynamic sessions, cutting-edge insights, and precious networking opportunities designed specifically for data recovery engineers and digital forensics professionals. Find it all - right here: ✓ Connect with the largest DR community ✓ Discover the latest breakthroughs ✓ Get an exclusive preview …
🔥7❤4🎉1
ACE Lab at the 14th Spring Sessions, Poland! It was fantastic to connect with so many digital forensics professionals and showcase live demonstrations of the PC-3000 solutions. Attendees were the first to discover our latest breakthrough: the brand-new Accelerator Software Add-on for the PC-3000 Mobile PRO - designed for recovering evidence at exponentially higher speed! Special thanks to our trusted partner, Medi…
🔥12❤5👏2
ACE Lab in Malaysia: productive meetings and new technologies!🔥 With the help of our trusted partner Prisma Khas, we hosted a closed Digital Forensics Workshop for top digital forensics experts, where the new Mobile PRO Accelerator Add-on was presented. Our Corporate Enterprise Workshop brought together major Malaysian corporations and private data recovery companies to discuss safer and the most efficient data rec…
❤6🔥6👍3🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ACE_Lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ACE Lab” (@ACE_Lab), 1,122 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ACE_Lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.