💦 AGUAIURIS 💦 EN DEFENSA DEL AGUA PÚBLICA, DEL SECTOR PRIMARIO ESPAÑOL Y DE NUESTRA BENDITA NACIÓN 🇪🇦ESPAÑA🇪🇦
TE PEDIMOS POR FAVOR QUE NO SOLO LEAS NUESTRAS NOTICIAS, SINO QUE TE SUSCRIBAS, YA QUE ESO AYUDARÁ MUCHO AL CRECIMIENTO DE ESTE CANAL.❤️
Created
30 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -318. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,135–27,549 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 00:00
27,183
-17
15 Sept 2026, 17:59
27,200
-16
14 Sept 2026, 00:38
27,216
-13
12 Sept 2026, 06:18
27,229
-19
10 Sept 2026, 00:21
27,248
-27
6 Sept 2026, 17:20
27,275
-15
4 Sept 2026, 04:17
27,290
-10
2 Sept 2026, 16:34
27,300
-7
31 Aug 2026, 18:56
27,307
-7
30 Aug 2026, 21:15
27,314
-10
29 Aug 2026, 20:55
27,324
-13
28 Aug 2026, 18:15
27,337
-7
27 Aug 2026, 20:02
27,344
-17
26 Aug 2026, 18:24
27,361
-14
25 Aug 2026, 18:44
27,375
-8
24 Aug 2026, 18:23
27,383
-13
23 Aug 2026, 00:09
27,396
-6
21 Aug 2026, 10:13
27,402
-5
20 Aug 2026, 08:48
27,407
-4
19 Aug 2026, 11:48
27,411
first reading
Engagement
408 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.25%
avg views ÷ 27,183 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,970
192 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
192
of 408 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 182 of 192 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held
408 (5 August 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Views total
378,474
Reactions total
11,927
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,320
Videos
≈5,800
Links
≈10,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 16m
Average length
1m 17s
Measured directly from 106 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,804 reactions across 359 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
5,559
22.4%
🔥
5,170
20.8%
🤮
5,097
20.5%
😡
2,170
8.75%
😈
1,128
4.55%
👌
951
3.83%
💯
949
3.83%
😱
855
3.45%
🤡
731
2.95%
😁
615
2.48%
🤔
379
1.53%
🙏
289
1.17%
🤯
153
0.617%
😢
144
0.581%
🖕
131
0.528%
👎
94
0.379%
😍
85
0.343%
❤🔥
37
0.149%
😭
30
0.121%
🤪
29
0.117%
29 further kinds
208
0.839%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 359 of the 408 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,804 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 408 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Están empezando a quebrar y sobre todo les preocupan las investigaciones desde los juzgados por expropiaciones ilegales y corrupción extrema con funcionarios conectados a políticos.
Adiós a la macroplanta solar de la Plana Baixa: la promotora de Arada Solar renuncia al proyecto https://share.google/lEerLZN7Bp4WOq9q2
LODOS QUE CONTIENEN METALES PESADOS, RESIDUOS ALTAMENTE TÓXICOS, CLOROS, JABONES Y QUE CUANDO LLUEVA VAN A CONTAMINAR LAS TIERRAS. ENTONCES APARECERÁN LOS SINVERGÜENZAS DE LOS ECOLOGETAS Y DIRÁN QUE ES QUE LOS AGRICULTORES HAN CONTAMINADO EL ACUÍFERO. NI PERDÓN NI OLVIDO A LOS QUE NOS ESTÁN ENVENENANDO NUESTROS CAMPOS, COMIDA Y AGUA
El Canal de Isabel II repartirá más de 170.000 toneladas de lodos para los cultivos …
✍🏻UNA ANIMALISTA EN UN ENCIERRO EN CIEMPOZUELOS ASEGURA QUE SI NO MOLESTAS AL TORO NO TE HARÁ NADA✍🏻
🙆🏻¡Imagínate lo que pasa después!🙆🏻
🙏🏻 SÍGUENOS EN 🛑YOUTUBE🛑🙏🏻
https://youtube.com/shorts/iIj7b2EmzKk?is=CYZGPb1JzqEhHSTC
El Censo Electoral admite ahora que inscribía a los nacionalizados en provincias sin pedir pruebas de su arraigo
Solo desde 2023 ha repartido por provincias a más de 400.000 nuevos votantes sin ningún documento ni comprobación que justifique ese reparto.
El Censo Electoral admite ahora que inscribía a los nacionalizados en provincias sin pedir pruebas de su arraigo
https://www.elconfidencial.com/espana/2026-09-18/in…
Os mostramos como desde hace meses están haciendo un auténtico paripé diciendo que están arreglando las losas rotas del jardín de la princesita y vemos como simplemente están mintiéndonos. ¿Cuanto nos van a robar otra vez diciendo que ha costado esta estafa de reparación? ¿Por qué no tenemos una supervisión real de los trabajos realizados? ¿Qué opinas?
🤦🏻♀️ PATRIMONIO NACIONAL 🇪🇸GOBIERNO DE ESPAÑA 🇪🇸 DESTROZA UN JARDÍN EN ARANJUEZ, SIMPLEMENTE PARA JUSTIFICAR UN EXPOLIO DE 13 MILLONES DE EUROS🤦🏻♀️
🙏🏻 SIGUE A PILAR ESQUINAS EN TWITTER-X🙏🏻
https://x.com/EsquinasPilar/status/2100670007743005115
💦🌺🌳EL EXPOLIO Y ATRACO AL ERARIO PÚBLICO DE PATRIMONIO NACIONAL, 🇪🇸GOBIERNO DE ESPAÑA 🇪🇸 EN ARANJUEZ🌳🌺💦
🙏🏻 SÍGUENOS EN 🛑YOUTUBE🛑🙏🏻
https://youtu.be/VIaDuxtkbzU
🇪🇦EL DESTROZO DEL PATRIMONIO NACIONAL GOBIERNO DE ESPAÑA EN LOS JARDINES HISTÓRICOS DE ARANJUEZ.🇪🇦
🙏🏻 SÍGUENOS EN 🛑YOUTUBE🛑 🙏🏻
https://youtu.be/vcJxljLfRB0?is=fRbaiyr_mLnwVt_H
Se les ha olvidado mencionar la desaladora y los depósitos de armas. Está claro que el gobierno solamente trabaja para los invasores y siempre tratando de ponérselo muy fácil para poder invadir la ciudad para quedarse con ella. Nada es accidental
Endesa y el Puerto de Ceuta alertan de un apagón por el riesgo de sabotaje a la central eléctrica
https://www.eleconomista.es/actualidad/noticias/14014226/09/26/endesa-y-el-…
Los mismos que impiden que te puedas expresar libremente y que los vídeos lleguen a todo el mundo ahora van a decidir quién puede votar o no. Por no pensar que lo van a hacer ellos directamente suplantando identidades
Un informe del Gobierno recomienda "el voto telemático" para los nietos de exiliados
https://okdiario.com/espana/informe-del-gobierno-recomienda-que-nietos-exiliados-puedan-votar-telematicamente-proxima…
Después de las graves inundaciones de la Dana se destinaron ingentes cantidades de recursos económicos para restaurar y evitar que se volviera a repetir la situación. ¿Dónde está el dinero y por qué no se ha invertido correctamente para prevenir que no haya más inundaciones? Estoy ya cansada de escuchar siempre lo del puñetero mensajito culpando sí ES-ALERT llegó o no. Detrás de ese mensajito hay un chiringuito de va…
👏81🔥21💯10👌6😈6
Showing the 12 most recent of 408 posts we hold for @AGUAIURIS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AGUAIURIS edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@AGUAIURIS named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@esquinaspilar named in 1 post, 23 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
LIBERUM ASOCIACION @liberumasociscion · 38,102 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
HealthBest Juan Zaragoza @healthbest · 36,653 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
Josep Pàmies Oficial @JosepPamiesOficial · 73,060 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Un Abogado contra la Demagogia @UACDE · 58,041 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
CANAL 5TV INFORMA @canal5informa · 42,318 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
Movimiento Asistencia Integral @movimiento_asistencia_integral · 28,065 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
El Diestro. Opinión en libertad @ElDiestro · 33,152 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Doctora Cristina Martín Jiménez @cristinamartinjimenezescritora · 56,800 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
@InfoVacunas @InfoVacunas · 59,027 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
DESOKUPA OFICIAL @desokupaOficial · 47,139 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
𝑼𝑵𝑬 80 𝑰𝒏𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂 @une80 · 47,477 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Vito Quiles 🇪🇸 @vitoquilestelegram · 150,160 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
EL AULLIDO CANAL Fernando López-Mirones @elaullido · 43,557 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Natalia Prego Cancelo MD, Dra, oficial Canal de difusión @DraNataliaPrego · 24,594 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
César Vidal | Canal Oficial @esCesarVidal · 23,854 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 September 2026
Ruben Gisbert @rubengisbertoficial · 73,013 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Mundo Desconocido @Mundo_Desconocido_Oficial · 28,329 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
Jorge Guerra - Canal de Historia @canaljorgeguerra · 22,010 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
Marc Vidal @marcvidal_telegram · 48,676 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
Robert Martínez - Canal oficial @robertmartinezastro · 51,908 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
Julio Ariza @Julioarizaeltoro · 50,426 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Akasha Comunidad @akashacomunidad · 49,959 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💦AGUAIURIS💦” (@AGUAIURIS), 27,183 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AGUAIURIS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.