Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for A Gentlemen's Club

Channel

A Gentlemen's Club

@AGentlemensClub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

156subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001363996668
TypeChannel
Username@AGentlemensClub
Created1 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AGentlemensClub

Growth

1561581576 August 2026 — 158 subscribers9 September 2026 — 158 subscribers11 September 2026 — 156 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 36 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 156–158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 12:40156-2
9 Sept 2026, 08:23158no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:55158first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 1 November 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
654.5%
👍545.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2021 to 23 July 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2022, 16:13 UTC≈1,810 views5 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @tribeofthefoxPhoto

Under the Trees Friends they are, trees who have conversations with you let your mind go like their leaves swing the light. They are friends, trees. They lay their shadow like an arm around you if you want to be alone and don't want to be alone. Poet: Fetze Pijlman, Nunspeet (picture: Tribe of the Fox)

4👍1

21 Jul 2022, 15:41 UTC≈1,650 views2 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @oakwhispersPhoto

My second destination. A well of healing water. I drank some of it flavoured with mead wort that grows all around the well. I gave a little sacrifice nearby. The well is dedicated to the Dragon that was slain by St Magnus, an Irish monk that started to convert the local Alamans after the Blood Court of Cannstatt. The Dragon legend is a metaphor of this foreign monk destroying a sacrificial site that might have been

2

21 Jul 2022, 15:39 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @oakwhispersPhoto

My first destination looks unimpressive, except for the view, but these are the remains of an Alamannic hillfort, Gabis. You can still see the ditch and dike. The Säuling is right in front of it in the distance. Coincidence? There was a sacrificial site close by that was destroyed by christian fanatics in 746 C.E. The hillfort is most likely from the 7th / 8th century, when the Alamannic folk rose against the Frank

4 Jul 2022, 16:26 UTC899 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @oakwhispersPhoto

On the left a detail of the reconstructed Anglo-Saxon helmet found at Sutton Hoo, Suffolk. It is widely believed to have belonged to King Rædwald of East Anglia. On the right the Plietzhausen brooch, found in an Alamannic woman's grave in southwestern Germany. Originally, the motive bearing disk of the brooch most likely had a larger diameter and is believed to have been part of a horse harness. Both artifacts are r

👍1

1 Mar 2022, 16:47 UTC≈1,400 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @WainolaPhoto

Lesser-known changes to our folk-poetry in the Finnish national epic A comparison between 4:1–12 of the Old #Kalevala (1835) and 9:1–12 of the New Kalevala (1849; shown here in a modern edition) reveals a crucial difference. Lönnrot, the compiler of the epic, changed one very important word. Keith Bosley translates the 1849 text thusly: “At that old Väinämöinen got out of the sleigh himself rose from the sledge, w

👍1

14 Feb 2022, 23:50 UTC≈1,000 views2 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @FolkishFrancePhoto

Fertility rites in which women were whipped with the hides of the sacrificed animals were performed during the Roman festival of Lupercalia. This was intended to make the women more fertile & aid in childbirth. A matchmaking lottery was then held. Lupercalia was celebrated in parts of Italy and Gaul. Luperci are attested by inscriptions at Nîmes in France. After the Romans added the month of February to their calen

👍2

14 Feb 2022, 23:50 UTC747 viewsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @FolkishFrancePhoto

Set on the 14th of February, Valentine's Day is nowadays a celebration of love. It goes back to the Roman festival of Lupercalia, originally known as Februa & linked to springtime purification. The name of February is derived from it. Associated gods are Juno & Faunus. The name Lupercalia was believed in antiquity to have a connection with an Ancient Greek wolf festival & the worship of Lycaean Pan, assumed to be a

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @AGentlemensClub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“A Gentlemen's Club” (@AGentlemensClub), 156 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AGentlemensClub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.