Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ai Prompts Free

Channel

Ai Prompts Free

@AIpromptFree

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,247subscribers

-90 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002059411477
TypeChannel
Username@AIpromptFree
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AIpromptFree

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,2473,3373,2927 August 2026 — 3,337 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,336 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,320 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,314 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,305 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,299 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,295 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,291 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,281 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,275 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,265 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,256 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,247 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,234–3,351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 22:013,247-9
11 Sept 2026, 04:013,256-9
6 Sept 2026, 06:013,265-10
2 Sept 2026, 09:533,275-6
30 Aug 2026, 03:553,281-10
27 Aug 2026, 03:543,291-4
23 Aug 2026, 23:273,295-4
20 Aug 2026, 15:373,299-6
17 Aug 2026, 11:183,305-9
13 Aug 2026, 16:053,314-6
10 Aug 2026, 23:463,320-16
7 Aug 2026, 16:283,336-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:023,337first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 28 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3948.8%
👍1518.8%
🔥1012.5%
😁78.75%
🤩45.00%
👏33.75%
11.25%
❤‍🔥11.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2025 to 9 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AIpromptFree. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 April 2025 to 9 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Nov 2025, 14:15 UTC≈5,780 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

something is cooking 🤗🤐

👏21🤩1

9 Nov 2025, 14:15 UTC≈5,880 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🎬 Video v1 a bomb blast

8👍1👏1

10 Oct 2025, 02:51 UTC≈9,150 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚀 Exciting News, Everyone! Hey folks! After a long system maintenance, our bot @St_diffusion_bot is finally back online — faster and stronger than ever! ⚡ ✅ What’s New: 💨 Super-enhanced speed — images now generate in under 10 seconds! 🔄 Never-stopping system — more stable and reliable performance. 🎥 You now need to subscribe to our YouTube channel to use the bot (don’t worry, it’s still 100% free). ⚠️ Note: Fa

5

8 Jul 2025, 09:23 UTC≈10,500 views13 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Everything including voice over Made with google veo 3 😱🥰😏 . . Note❕: only for entertainment😄 purpose

10😁3

8 Jul 2025, 09:22 UTC≈9,340 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

A handsome Indian man with a well-groomed beard and sharp jawline, standing confidently in an urban street at night with neon lights glowing around him. He looks into the camera with a slight smirk and says in Hindi: "आज लड़कियां मर्दों से कम नहीं, पर हमें इसका कोई गम नहीं। माना कि वो फ्यूचर में आसमान पर जाएँगी, मगर रात को तो हमारे ही नीचे आएँगी।" He gives a playful wink after saying this, then walks away with a swag

3👍21❤‍🔥1

6 Jun 2025, 04:32 UTC≈8,890 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A shattered heart lies amidst a stormy, twilight sky, its fragments glowing with an ethereal, melancholic light. The scene is captured in a dramatic, close-up composition, with the heart's jagged edges casting long, dramatic shadows. The background features a swirling, moody atmosphere, with distant, faint stars peeking through the gloom, adding a touch of hope to the sorrowful scene. The heart's texture is intricate

10🤩3👍2😁1

30 Apr 2025, 10:51 UTC≈7,580 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A surreal landscape stretching beyond the horizon, where gravity defies logic and vibrant, otherworldly flora bloom. Bioluminescent plants cast an ethereal glow, while whimsical creatures roam freely. The sky is a canvas of swirling colors, with twin moons casting a soft, dual shadow. Capture the scene from a high vantage point, with a sense of depth and infinite possibilities. Use a vivid, dreamlike color palette an

🔥8👍4😁31

28 Apr 2025, 15:17 UTC≈5,120 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Tools Used in Production: Hailuo and Luma Dream Machine for AI video generation Stable Diffusion XL (SDXL) trained on LoRA models for high-quality image creation Hedra for advanced AI lip-syncing Adobe After Effects for post-production editing and visual enhancements Pixabay for select stock videos and background music

👍6🔥21

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @AIpromptFree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Techno-Tricksters
@technotricksters · 48,243
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 16 here — alongside 15 others — read 26 August 2026
Photify AI Channel
@photifyai · 62,290
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ai Prompts Free” (@AIpromptFree), 3,247 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIpromptFree.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.