🚨هوش مصنوعی از صفحهنمایش بیرون زد!🤯 تصور کن به یک AI بگی: «این آزمایش رو انجام بده.» و بهجای اینکه فقط جواب بده، خودش دستبهکار بشه! 🦾 🔬 میکروسکوپ رو کنترل کنه 🧪 تجهیزات آزمایشگاهو به کار بگیره 🤖 بازوی رباتیک رو هدایت کنه ⚛️ حتی لیزرهای مورد استفاده در رایانش کوانتومی رو کالیبره کنه! این دقیقاً چیزیست که Anthropic با استاندارد جدیدش به نام Model Hardware Standard (MHS) دنبال میکنه. در واقع MHS یک استاندارد…

Channel
هوش مصنوعی | دانشوران
@AIscholars_ir
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
12,975subscribers
-423 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001399571638 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AIscholars_ir |
| Created | Between 1 July 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AIscholars_ir |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 12,975 | -30 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 13,005 | -18 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 13,023 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 13,029 | -16 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 13,045 | -31 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 13,076 | -25 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 13,101 | -14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:25 | 13,115 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 13,122 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:25 | 13,128 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 13,133 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 13,140 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 13,146 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 13,158 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 13,168 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 13,174 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 13,183 | -12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 13,195 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 13,212 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 13,226 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 19 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.19%
- avg views ÷ 12,975 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 284
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (19 September 2025 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 284 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 13m 46s
- Average length
- 1m 58s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
183 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 101 | 55.2% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 15.3% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 7.65% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 7.10% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 4.92% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 3.83% | |
| 🤨 | 4 | 2.19% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 1.64% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.546% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.546% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.546% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.546% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
به نظر شما کدام تیم قهرمان جامجهانی خواهد شد؟
- فرانسه 🇲🇫30%
- آرژانتین 🇦🇷21%
- اسپانیا 🇪🇸34%
- انگلیس 🏴3%
- پرتقال🇵🇹10%
- برزیل 🇧🇷3%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2💔1
Gemini🔮 پرامپت: “A crystal-clear swimming pool made entirely of translucent amber orange jello on a clean white gradient background. A powerful tiger made from the same amber jello sprints across the jello surface before launching into a dramatic leap over the pool. Every movement creates satisfying wobbles, stretchy splashes, and glossy ripples. The camera follows the tiger in a smooth cinematic tracking shot with s…
❤4
🌓یک فیلم کوتاه که توسط AI ساخته شده @AIscholars_ir⚡️
🤨4👍3🤣1😐1
ای اهل حرم میر و علمدار نیامد...💔 ایام عزاداری حسینی بر شما تسلیت باد.
❤53👎10💩7💔2🦄1
🎥 بهترین ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی برای تولید و ویرایش محتوای ویدیویی 🔹️تولید ویدیو با هوش مصنوعی: · Gemini Veo 3.1 (gemini.google/overview/video) · Sora 2 (sora.chatgpt.com/explore) · Runway (Gen-4.5) runwayml.com · Kling (app.klingai.com/global/omni/ne…) · Pika Labs (pika.art/login) · Synthesia (synthesia.io) · Wan 2.6 (create.wan.video/generate/video) 🔹️ ویرایش ویدیو با هوش مصنوعی: · Descript (descript.com) · OpusCl…
👍7❤1
🌎مدلهای هوش مصنوعی و کشور سازنده آنها • ChatGPT - 🇺🇸 ایالات متحده (OpenAI) • Claude - 🇺🇸 ایالات متحده (Anthropic) • Gemini - 🇺🇸 ایالات متحده (Google) • Grok - 🇺🇸 ایالات متحده (xAI) • Llama - 🇺🇸 ایالات متحده (Meta) • Mistral - 🇫🇷 فرانسه (Mistral AI) • DeepSeek - 🇨🇳 چین (DeepSeek AI) • Qwen - 🇨🇳 چین (Alibaba) • ERNIE - 🇨🇳 چین (Baidu) • Falcon - 🇦🇪 امارات متحده عربی • Sarvam-1 - 🇮🇳 هند (Sarvam AI) • Krutrim LLM - 🇮🇳 ه…
👍11
💯به کیفیت Omni توجه کنید! @AIscholars_IR⚡️
🔥4❤1
👨👩👧👧 با Ai میشه جمعیت رو خیلی بیشتر نشون داد! @Aischolars_ir⚡️
👍4👎3😁1
📝 بیشتر مردم در عمل گزینه ۱ یا ۳ رو انتخاب میکنن. علت این انتخاب چیه؟ مغالطه هزینه ازدسترفته (Sunk Cost Fallacy) 🔴 چرا همچنان در حال تلف کردن زمان و پول خود هستیم؟ (حتی وقتی می دونیم ادامه دادن فایده ای نداره) 🧠 مغالطه هزینه ازدسترفته (Sunk Cost Fallacy) چیه؟ یعنی ما به خاطر پول، زمان یا انرژی که قبلاً خرج کردیم و هیچ راهی برای برگردوندنش نیست، به کاری ادامه میدیم که دیگه به صلاحمون نیست. به جای اینکه بگیم: …
❤4👍1
Posted without readable text
🔴فرض کن ۲میلیون تومن دادی و بلیط سینما خریدی. نیمهی فیلم که رسیدی، میبینی فیلم افتضاحه، بازیگراش بد بازی میکنن و داری از شدت بیحوصلگی به ساعت نگاه میکنی. 👇
🤯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @AIscholars_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظر شما کدام تیم قهرمان جامجهانی خواهد شد؟
- فرانسه 🇲🇫30%
- آرژانتین 🇦🇷21%
- اسپانیا 🇪🇸34%
- انگلیس 🏴3%
- پرتقال🇵🇹10%
- برزیل 🇧🇷3%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
چطور وصل شدید؟؟
- رایتل8%
- همراه39%
- ایرانسل40%
- مودم13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هوش مصنوعی | دانشوران” (@AIscholars_ir), 12,975 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIscholars_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.