"هوش مصنوعی جایگزین انسان ها نخواهد شد.
انسان هایی که می توانند از هوش مصنوعی استفاده کنند جایگزین دیگر انسان ها خواهند شد."
گزیدهٔ هوشمند دنیای هوش مصنوعی، فیلترشده برای تو.
☎️ ارتباط با ما : @Ai_adss
Created
Between 1 November 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net -811. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,465–13,520 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 06:17
12,587
-6
5 Nov 2026, 05:26
12,593
-7
4 Nov 2026, 05:56
12,600
-7
3 Nov 2026, 05:30
12,607
-16
2 Nov 2026, 04:39
12,623
-8
1 Nov 2026, 07:27
12,631
-11
31 Oct 2026, 09:54
12,642
-5
30 Oct 2026, 10:20
12,647
-2
29 Oct 2026, 12:45
12,649
-6
28 Oct 2026, 09:25
12,655
-6
27 Oct 2026, 12:56
12,661
-10
26 Oct 2026, 12:08
12,671
-3
25 Oct 2026, 10:47
12,674
-7
24 Oct 2026, 09:41
12,681
-9
23 Oct 2026, 12:10
12,690
-9
22 Oct 2026, 14:01
12,699
-12
21 Oct 2026, 08:48
12,711
-11
20 Oct 2026, 05:19
12,722
-10
19 Oct 2026, 06:08
12,732
-16
18 Oct 2026, 06:39
12,748
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 19 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.99%
avg views ÷ 12,587 subscribers
Avg views / post
376
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.374%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
41 (19 September 2025 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
3,764
Reactions total
11
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 06:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈230
Videos
≈94
Links
≈1,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
13m 46s
Average length
1m 58s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
218 reactions across 34 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
120
55.0%
👍
32
14.7%
🤯
20
9.17%
👎
13
5.96%
🔥
12
5.50%
💩
7
3.21%
🤨
4
1.83%
💔
3
1.38%
👏
2
0.917%
🤣
2
0.917%
😁
1
0.459%
😐
1
0.459%
🦄
1
0.459%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📝 قبل از امتحان، از هوش مصنوعی بخواه ازت امتحان بگیره؛ فقط خلاصه کردن درس کافی نیست
تحقیقات یادگیری نشون داده خودت رو محک زدن، از دوباره خوندن مؤثرتره. این پرامپت همین کار رو برات میکنه:
🎯 پرامپت:
«این متن درس منه: [متن درس].
نقش یه مدرس سختگیر رو بازی کن. ۲۰ سؤال بپرس، از ساده به سخت، و هر بار فقط یه سؤال.
بعد از هر جواب من بگو درست بود یا نه و کجاش ناقص بود، بعد سؤال بعدی رو بپرس.
آخرش بگو کدوم مباحث رو باید دو…
🧠 اگه این ۴ چیز رو دربارهی هوش مصنوعی باور داری، احتمالاً داری وقتت رو هدر میدی
1️⃣ «هرچی جواب مطمئنتر باشه، درستتره»
❌ هوش مصنوعی میتونه یه چیز غلط رو با لحن کاملاً مطمئن بگه. عدد، تاریخ و منبع رو همیشه چک کن.
2️⃣ «گرونترین مدل، بهترین مدل برای کار منه»
❌ برای خیلی از کارهای روزمره، مدل سادهتر هم همون جواب رو میده. روی کار خودت امتحان کن.
3️⃣ «یه پرامپت جادویی هست که همهچیز رو حل کنه»
❌ چیزی که جواب رو خوب…
💸 اگه اشتراک ChatGPT داری، دیگه لازم نیست برای هوش مصنوعی Notion دوباره پول بدی
در واقع Notion اجازه داده اشتراک پولی ChatGPT (پلاس، پرو و گو) رمستقیم توی دستیار شخصیاش استفاده بشه. 🔌
دو تغییر مهم دیگه:
⏳ دستیارهای Notion حالا میتونن بیشتر از ۲۴ ساعت روی یه کار کار کنن (قبلاً فقط ۵ دقیقه)
🛡 یه حالت جدید به اسم «بازبینی برای من»: یه مدل جداگانه قبل از هر اقدام دستیار چک میکنه امنه یا نه
⚠️ فعلاً فقط برای دستیار شخ…
🚫 هیچوقت رمز بانکت رو به یه AI Agent نده؛ بانکهای بزرگ آمریکا همین الان دارن باهاشون مقابله میکنن
بانکهایی مثل Morgan Stanley، JPMorgan و Citi گزارش دادن که Agentهای AI با رمز و نام کاربری خودِ مشتریها وارد حسابها شدن، و بعضیهاشون کارهایی کردن که کاربر ازشون نخواسته بود. 😳
مشکل اینه که بانک نمیتونه تشخیص بده این Agent واقعاً از طرف تو کار میکنه یا خودسر شده.
✅ اگه میخوای از AI برای مسائل مالی کمک بگیری:
🔹 ف…
📲دیگه AI منتظر دستور تو نمیمونه؛ اینبار خودش اول بهت پیام میده
شرکت Anthropic اپلیکیشن Claude Duet رو معرفی کرد: دستیاری که هر صبح بهت میگه امروز چه چیزی به توجه تو نیاز داره، توی اپهات (مثل Gmail) کارها رو پیش میبره و قبل از هر کار حساس، ازت اجازه میگیره. ✋
⚠️ فعلاً فقط برای مشترکین Pro و Max آمریکا و با لیست انتظاره. OpenAI و Meta هم دستیارهای مشابه دارن؛ رقابت اصلی الان سر همینه.
🎬 ویدیو رسمی
منبع: Anthr…
یه شرکت فرانسوی🇲🇫 یه مدل یکتریلیونپارامتری ساخته و ۲۷ اکتبر کاملاً رایگان منتشرش میکنه 🔥
شرکت Mistral AI، یکی از رقبای اروپایی OpenAI و گوگل، از Large 4 (با اسم مستعار «Le Chonk» 🐱) رونمایی کرده.
چرا این خبر مهمه؟
فایلهای کامل این مدل قراره ۲۷ اکتبر (چند روز دیگه) کاملاً رایگان و قابلدانلود منتشر بشن — یعنی هرکسی میتونه دانلودش کنه و روی سیستم خودش اجرا کنه، بدون وابستگی به سرور یه شرکت خاص. 🆓
مشخصات:
🔢 ۱.۰۵ تر…
✍️ قبل از اینکه به AI Agent بگی چیکار کنه، بهش بگو کجا باید وایسه 🛑
می دونیم که چرا Agentها بدون «مرز قرمز» میتونن از کنترل خارج بشن. حالا این هم راهحل عملیش.
🎯 پرامپت:
«[کار اصلی رو اینجا بنویس]
این کار رو با این محدودیتها انجام بده:
۱️⃣ حداکثر [عدد] بار این عمل رو تکرار کن، نه بیشتر
۲️⃣ اگه بعد از [مدت زمان] به نتیجه نرسیدی، متوقف شو و گزارش بده
۳️⃣ اگه نیاز به دسترسی یا تایید بیشتری داشتی، بهجای ادامه دادن، ا…
🚨 اتحادیهی اروپا رسماً شروع به بازجویی از OpenAI و Anthropic کرده 🇪🇺
همانطور که می دونید AI Agent ها ممکنه بدون اجازه از محیط تست خارج بشن. حالا این ماجرا رسماً وارد فاز قانونی شده.
📋کمیسیون اروپا، برای اولین بار از وقتی قانون AI Act به اجرا دراومده، درخواست رسمی دریافت اطلاعات به OpenAI و Anthropic فرستاده.
دو حادثهی خاص باعث این درخواست شدن:
🔓 یه Agent از OpenAI از محیط تستش فرار کرد و وارد سیستم Hugging Face شد…
📊بزرگترین کاربرد واقعی AI اصلاً چیزی نیست که فکر میکردی!😳
همه فکر میکنن مردم بیشتر از AI برای نوشتن، کدنویسی یا تحقیق استفاده میکنن...
اما یک بررسی روی نزدیک به ۱۳ هزار مورد واقعی استفاده از AI (از ردیت، لینکدین، تیکتاک و یوتیوب) یه واقعیت متفاوت رو نشون داد 👇
🥇 رتبهی اول: درمان و حمایت عاطفی — دو سال پیاپی! و از ۵٪ به ۱۱٪ کل استفادهها رسیده
🥈 رتبهی دوم: رفع اشکال فنی (troubleshooting)
🥉 رتبهی سوم: سرگرمی و…
🐉بزرگترین مدل متنباز تاریخ رونمایی شد!📦
علیبابا مدل جدیدش Qwen3.8-Max رو معرفی کرد — با ۲.۴ تریلیون پارامتر 🤯
این یعنی چی؟ برای مقایسه: این حدوداً ۱۵ برابر بزرگتر از خیلی از مدلهای معروفیه که هر روز باهاشون کار میکنی!
نکتهی مهمتر از حجمش:
✅ برای اولینبار، علیبابا وزنهای (weights) یک مدل ردهی «Max» رو متنباز منتشر میکنه — یعنی هرکسی میتونه دانلودش کنه و روش کار کنه
🖼 چند وجهیه: متن، تصویر و ویدیو رو هم…
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @AIscholars_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هوش مصنوعی | دانشوران” (@AIscholars_ir), 12,587 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIscholars_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.