Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗣𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗦𝗧

Channel

𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗣𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗦𝗧

@AL22C3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003328102494
TypeChannel
Username@AL22C3
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AL22C3

Growth

151615.510 August 2026 — 16 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16 subscribers10 August 202616 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 37 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15–16 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:2116+1
13 Sept 2026, 20:2315no change
25 Aug 2026, 03:3415-1
10 Aug 2026, 14:5516first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
223.0%
avg views ÷ 16 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.7
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026
Posts held19 (21 August 202613 September 2026)
Views total571
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 20:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
39s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5237872321535949558936.0%
custom 5422563105039220949416.0%
custom 5426928617173046099312.0%
custom 526936133812305036528.00%
custom 538859953874955773028.00%
custom 524451990441297422514.00%
custom 524671050523766222814.00%
custom 540219652903538358614.00%
custom 540708711380605553114.00%
custom 544956013988546210214.00%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Sept 2026, 18:51 UTC10 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Что-то пердыня мне уже не кажется самовлюбленным уебком с манией величия и комплексом бога, мне реально становится его жалко..🌟

custom 52445199044129742251custom 54021965290353835861

13 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @tirajpgPhoto

Хеловин будеш?

custom 54070871138060555311

12 Sept 2026, 12:54 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Video

(。╯︵╰。) . . .🩹

custom 52467105052376622281

8 Sept 2026, 18:46 UTC25 viewsread 13 September 2026

Дана набухалась теперь отправляет мне кружочки и заливает про какой-то день атаки титанов

7 Sept 2026, 19:13 UTC25 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

11классницы😍😍😊▫️

custom 52378723215359495583

2 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC47 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 53885995387495577302

2 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC45 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

#art. Я и легенда😐❤️❤️ Я НЕ ХОЧУ БЫТЬ СЕЛФШИППЕРОМ БЛЯЯЯЧЯЯЯ ✨🅱️🦴🅱️💫🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌧️

custom 52378723215359495583

30 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC46 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026

«Не то чтобы я очень хороший друг. Я скорее спаситель, которому нужно, чтобы его почитали и обожали.»

custom 52693613381230503652custom 52378723215359495581

29 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC50 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

#art. Не особо заморачивалась над её дизайном, позже доработаю ✨🅱️🦴🅱️💫🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌧️

custom 52378723215359495582

26 Aug 2026, 22:54 UTC49 viewsread 13 September 2026

«Искусство рождается только от горя. И никогда – от радости.»

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @AL22C3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗣𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗦𝗧” (@AL22C3), 16 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AL22C3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.