Religion โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
12.8 average views per post against 13,812 subscribers โ an engagement rate of 0.093%. Across the 4,254 registered channels in the same cohort โ 10,001โ31,617 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic โ the middle half sit between 2.27% and 11.0%, with a median of 5.67%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (21 August 2026 โ 20 September 2026)
Posts measured
77 of 77 published in the window (77 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
988
Mature posts only
0.43% over 13 posts read at least 24h after publication
ยฑ0.209% of the figure, from Telegramโs rounding
Post language
Arabic ยท 94.2% of the windowโs posts
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร away from that cohortโs median โ below it โ on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes โ audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโs own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 20 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 42 days, net -97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 13,797โ13,924 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 09:39
13,812
-5
15 Sept 2026, 09:56
13,817
-1
13 Sept 2026, 20:01
13,818
-7
12 Sept 2026, 04:19
13,825
+3
9 Sept 2026, 18:17
13,822
-11
6 Sept 2026, 09:54
13,833
+1
4 Sept 2026, 05:36
13,832
+3
2 Sept 2026, 21:38
13,829
-2
1 Sept 2026, 21:15
13,831
-2
31 Aug 2026, 21:56
13,833
+2
30 Aug 2026, 20:35
13,831
-8
29 Aug 2026, 23:02
13,839
-3
29 Aug 2026, 00:45
13,842
-5
28 Aug 2026, 03:47
13,847
-8
27 Aug 2026, 00:33
13,855
-3
26 Aug 2026, 03:56
13,858
+1
25 Aug 2026, 03:25
13,857
-10
23 Aug 2026, 22:13
13,867
+1
22 Aug 2026, 09:35
13,866
+4
21 Aug 2026, 00:12
13,862
first reading
Engagement
189 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
0.093%
avg views รท 13,812 subscribers
Avg views / post
12.8
77 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
77
of 189 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
189 (1 August 2026 โ 2 September 2026)
Views total
988
Reactions total
โ
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 35s
Average length
1m 16s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Showing the 12 most recent of 189 posts we hold for @ALBETAQASlTE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 91 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ALBETAQASlTE named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@mashahedemaney named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 โ 3 September 2026 ยท confirmed gone 4 September 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
๐ธูู ุณุฉ ูุชุงุฉ๐ธ @wwaaff ยท 26,427 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here โ alongside 86 others โ read 12 September 2026
ููู ูุงุช ุงู ุฑุฃุฉ @ppawp ยท 41,578 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here โ alongside 86 others โ read 29 August 2026
๐๐ฉบ ุทุจูุจ ๐ฉบ๐ @tabibgroup ยท 50,865 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here โ alongside 90 others โ read 25 August 2026
ูุจุงุฑ ุงูุนูู ุงุก @lllaaael ยท 24,131 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here โ alongside 90 others โ read 16 September 2026
ุชุนูู ุงูุฅูุฌููุฒูุฉ @English_201 ยท 75,073 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here โ alongside 95 others โ read 19 August 2026
ูุงุชุญุฒู @F15FF ยท 55,943 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here โ alongside 88 others โ read 23 August 2026
ู ุทุจุฎ ุงูุจูุช ุงูุณุนูุฏ @thamar5850 ยท 64,303 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here โ alongside 94 others โ read 21 August 2026
โจุญูููู ููุฃููุงูโจ @raaaa77 ยท 23,114 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here โ alongside 73 others โ read 19 September 2026
ุงููู ุขูุฉ @Efham_Aya ยท 39,655 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here โ alongside 95 others โ read 30 August 2026
ููู ุงุช ุงูุฌููุฒู ู ุชุฑุฌู ุฉ @English259 ยท 50,860 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here โ alongside 89 others โ read 25 August 2026
๐ ุชุนูู ุงูุงูุฌููุฒูุฉ ๐ @English7711 ยท 48,959 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 25 August 2026
๐ฉ ู ุทุจุฎ ุญูุง ๐ฉ @sky7la ยท 25,015 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here โ alongside 84 others โ read 14 September 2026
ุชุนูู ุญุฏูุซ @Talam_Hadith ยท 50,036 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 25 August 2026
ูุตุงุฆุญ ููุฒูุฌ @FOREVVER1 ยท 44,787 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here โ alongside 91 others โ read 28 August 2026
๐ฐูุตููุงุช ุทูุจุฎ๐ฒ @Chef_domooo3q8 ยท 42,690 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here โ alongside 87 others โ read 29 August 2026
ุฒุงุฏ ุงูู ุณูู ููุฌูุฉ @zaaad2 ยท 39,138 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here โ alongside 89 others โ read 31 August 2026
ูุตุงุฆุญ ููุฒูุฌุฉ @aaii5599 ยท 53,774 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here โ alongside 81 others โ read 24 August 2026
ุฃููุงู ู ู ุฐูุจโ @Thamar21 ยท 44,507 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here โ alongside 89 others โ read 28 August 2026
ุงูุชูููู ุงููุฌุฑู @aitaqWem ยท 94,078 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here โ alongside 96 others โ read 16 August 2026
ุงูุดูุฎ ุงุจู ุนุซูู ูู @binothaymen ยท 26,208 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here โ alongside 86 others โ read 12 September 2026
ุณุคุงู ูุฌูุงุจโ @Thamar19 ยท 38,016 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here โ alongside 90 others โ read 31 August 2026
๐ ู ูุฉ ูุงูู ุฏููุฉ ๐ @masko ยท 24,874 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here โ alongside 91 others โ read 15 September 2026
ุฑูุงุฆุน ุงูููุฏูู @Thamar15 ยท 43,722 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here โ alongside 94 others โ read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ุงูุจุทุงูุฉ ุงูุฏุนููุฉ๐โ (@ALBETAQASlTE), 13,812 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ALBETAQASlTE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.