Channel
@ALJNUB2
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,128subscribers
-793 since we began measuring on 19 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002221037181 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ALJNUB2 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ALJNUB2 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
10.2 average views per post against 31,149 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.033%. Across the 4,836 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,004–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.98% and 14.2%, with a median of 7.18%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 502 of 502 published in the window (502 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 5,100 |
| Mature posts only | 0.036% over 177 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 31,149 measured 4 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:ara · 4,836 channels · p10 1.05% · p25 2.98% · p50 7.18% · p75 14.2% · p90 25.0% |
| Position in cohort | 0.021th percentile · 1/200 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.093% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Arabic · 97.7% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:47 | 31,128 | -21 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:27 | 31,149 | -10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:25 | 31,159 | -21 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:58 | 31,180 | -11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:20 | 31,191 | -13 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:30 | 31,204 | -26 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:00 | 31,230 | -20 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:50 | 31,250 | -16 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:30 | 31,266 | -15 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:44 | 31,281 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 31,296 | -21 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:49 | 31,317 | -12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:31 | 31,329 | -16 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 31,345 | -17 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:18 | 31,362 | -19 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:48 | 31,381 | -18 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:26 | 31,399 | -27 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 07:04 | 31,426 | -21 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 31,447 | -14 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:05 | 31,461 | first reading |
824 posts held, back to 18 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 824 (18 September 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 5,069 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 10:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 98 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 263 of 499 posts held from the last 30 days (52.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«ما حدث يعادل سياسياً اصطدام نيزك بالأرض»، هكذا وصف حاكم ولاية فلوريدا رون ديسانتيس الهزيمة الساحقة التي مُني بها الجمهوريون في انتخابات التجديد النصفي الأميركية، مشيراً إلى أنها بمثابة كارثة سياسية قد تضعف الحزب لسنوات https://t.me/ALJNUB2
Signed Sattar Al-karim
⭕️لايمكن ان ينسى ؛ الذي قدمته الجمهورية الاسلامية للعراق في احلك الظروف ؛ وخاصة عندما تخلى عنا الدول العربية والدول الصديقة الكبرى مثل الصين وروسيا ودول اوربا ؛ فأن الجمهورية الاسلامية اكدت على دعمها للعراق وسارعت قبل فوات الاوان بأرسال كل مايحتاج له العراق لمقاومة الدواعش ⭕️وزير الدفاع العراقي السابق خالد العبيدي https://t.me/ALJNUB2
Signed Sattar Al-karim
لايمكن ان ينسى ؛ الذي قدمته الجمهورية الاسلامية للعراق في احلك الظروف ؛ وخاصة عندما تخلى عنا الدول العربية والدول الصديقة الكبرى مثل الصين وروسيا ودول اوربا ؛ فأن الجمهورية الاسلامية اكدت على دعمها للعراق وسارعت قبل فوات الاوان بأرسال كل مايحتاج له العراق لمقاومة الدواعش وزير الدفاع العراقي السابق خالد العبيدي
Signed Sattar Al-karim
⭕️ بلينكن: نتائج الانتخابات الأمريكية تحمل رسالة واضحة؛ على ترامب السعي إلى حل دبلوماسي بدلاً من الحرب مع إيران 🔻 كتب وزير الخارجية الأمريكي الأسبق، أنتوني بلينكن، في منشور عبر منصة «إكس»: 🔻 «تحمل نتائج انتخابات التجديد النصفي رسالة واضحة: إن طريقة حضورنا وأدائنا على الساحة العالمية تؤثر في حياتنا داخل البلاد، والأمريكيون يدركون ذلك. 🔻 عندما ننفّر حلفاءنا، ونتساهل مع المستبدين، ونفرض رسوماً جمركية تعسفية، ونتسبب ف…
Signed Sattar Al-karim
«ترامب يبحث عن كبش فداء لحرب إيران».. شبكة سي إن إن تكشف عن غضب الرئيس الأميركي وشعوره بالتضليل وسط احتمالات تحميل وزير الدفاع مسؤولية تداعيات الحرب كشفت شبكة سي إن إن الأميركية، نقلاً عن مصادر مقربة من الرئيس دونالد ترامب، أن الأخير يشعر بأنه تعرض للتضليل بشأن الحرب مع إيران، ويعتقد أن أحد المسؤولين في إدارته يجب أن يتحمل مسؤولية تداعياتها. وبحسب الشبكة، يتوقع عدد من حلفاء ترامب أن يبحث الرئيس عن كبش فداء لتحميله …
Signed Sattar Al-karim
لم يقتصر نجاح الديمقراطيين في السيطرة على الكونغرس الأميركي، يوم الثلاثاء، على المستوى الاتحادي فحسب، بل امتد ليشمل الولايات؛ إذ نجح الحزب في انتزاع مناصب حكام كانت تحت سيطرة الجمهوريين في خمس ولايات على الأقل، كما بات على أعتاب بسط السيطرة الكاملة على الحكومات في ما لا يقل عن ست ولايات أخرى https://t.me/ALJNUB2
Signed Sattar Al-karim
ترامب: إذا أقدم الديمقراطيون على مساءلتي بهدف العزل فسيؤدي ذلك إلى تدمير الحزب الديمقراطي https://t.me/ALJNUB2
Signed Sattar Al-karim
واشنطن/ بدريون تيوز دعا زعيم الديمقراطيين في مجلس الشيوخ الأمريكي، تشاك شومر، اليوم الأربعاء، إلى إنهاء الحرب الأمريكية على إيران، مؤكداً أن الشعب الأمريكي لا يعرف الأسباب الحقيقية وراء شنها. وقال شومر في تصريحات صحفية: إن "الأمريكيين لا يعرفون سبب شن الحرب على إيران، وينبغي أن تنتهي"، في موقف يعكس استمرار اعتراضه على السياسة التي تتبعها إدارة الرئيس دونالد ترامب تجاه طهران. وكان شومر قد انتقد- في تصريحات سابقة- غياب…
Signed Sattar Al-karim
فانس: الحرب على ايران وقطع العلاقة مع اسرائيل واشنطن/ بدريون نيوز نائب الرئيس الأمريكي جي دي فانس: كثيرون صوتوا للديمقراطيين بدافع إنهاء الحرب مع إيران وتكلفة المعيشة وتغيير علاقاتنا بإسرائيل https://t.me/ALJNUB2
Signed Sattar Al-karim
وينهم الشيعة: ايران انتصرت بتمسكها بالله تعالى والنهج المحمدي الاصيل واهل بيت النبوة ع https://t.me/ALJNUB2
Signed Sattar Al-karim
وينهم الشيعة: ايران انتصرت بتمسكها بالله تعالى والنهج المحمدي الاصيل واهل بيت النبوة ع https://t.me/ALJNUB2
Signed Sattar Al-karim
منصورة باشيعة علي ع https://t.me/ALJNUB2
Signed Sattar Al-karim
Showing the 12 most recent of 824 posts we hold for @ALJNUB2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ALJNUB2 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 2 posts on @ALJNUB2 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بدريون الاخبارية” (@ALJNUB2), 31,128 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ALJNUB2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.