Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Andrei Martyanov 2.0

Channel

Andrei Martyanov 2.0

@AMartyanovVersion_2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

7,763subscribers

+4,830 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003994246747
TypeChannel
Username@AMartyanovVersion_2
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live1 November 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/AMartyanovVersion_2

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

2,9337,7635,3483 September 2026 — 2,933 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,933 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,266 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,269 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,599 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,804 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,177 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,387 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,503 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,544 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,571 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,614 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,660 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,704 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,729 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,763 subscribers3 September 20261 November 2026
16 measurements spanning 59 days, net +4,830. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,209–8,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Nov 2026, 19:277,763+34
29 Oct 2026, 15:057,729+25
26 Oct 2026, 23:267,704+44
23 Oct 2026, 16:017,660+46
21 Oct 2026, 02:207,614+43
17 Oct 2026, 22:157,571+27
15 Oct 2026, 03:577,544+41
12 Oct 2026, 05:227,503+116
5 Oct 2026, 14:007,387+210
27 Sept 2026, 21:377,177+373
18 Sept 2026, 01:016,804+205
13 Sept 2026, 21:416,599+330
9 Sept 2026, 23:576,269+2,003
5 Sept 2026, 01:424,266+1,333
3 Sept 2026, 09:452,933no change
3 Sept 2026, 09:302,933first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.7%
avg views ÷ 7,763 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,710
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held46 (2 September 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total145,970
Reactions total6,780
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
222
Videos
198
Links
178

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11m 11s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,895 reactions across 45 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,54032.2%
💯1,17714.9%
😁97812.4%
🔥7189.09%
🤣7139.03%
❤3174.02%
🤬2923.70%
🎉2563.24%
👏1211.53%
🤡861.09%
😡670.849%
🥴670.849%
🙉620.785%
🤷‍♀610.773%
🤔560.709%
🤷‍♂520.659%
😎480.608%
🙈470.595%
🤯340.431%
💩300.38%
20 further kinds1732.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,895 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (6.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 06:43 UTC≈2,890 views169 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🗣️ Филлипс О’Брайен, историк и профессор стратегических исследований Университета Сент-Эндрюс: «Историки будущего назовут решение США начать войну против Ирана худшим решением о начале войны за всю историю страны — решением, которое стало катастрофическим как со стратегической, так и с политической точки зрения». @parstodayrussian

💯121👍28🥱15❤4😁1

4 Nov 2026, 06:43 UTC≈2,900 views222 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Да, простите, заебли эти историки-стратеги. Вьетнам и катастрофа в нем, изменившая США с последующим скатыванием к тому, что сейчас имеем. Глобальная Война Против Террора—кульминация в унижении и катастрофе в Афганистане. 404—полное и окончательное банкротство стратегии и оперативных планов, полная демилитаризация США Россией и как результат—конвульсии в Иране. ВСЯ, читаем, ВСЯ военная история США после ВМВ—это одна …

👍125💯81👏10❤3🔥2💩1

4 Nov 2026, 06:26 UTC≈3,000 views129 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Макс Блюменталь: последствия войны против Ирана вернулись в саму Америку 🗣️Макс Блюменталь, журналист и политический аналитик: 🔻 Трамп развязал проигранную войну против Ирана ради израиля. Теперь последствия этой войны вернулись в саму Америку. 🔻 Контроль Ирана над Ормузским проливом превратился в петлю давления на Республиканскую партию, особенно в центральных регионах США, где цены на дизельное топливо выросли н…

👍94🔥32❤3

4 Nov 2026, 06:26 UTC≈3,050 views126 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Макс, конечно, смелый человек, но совершенно верно замечено—мощные, неподебимые ВС США, так "выиграли" войну с Ираном (причем неоднократно), что Оранжевый даже не понял как так случилось.

😁108👍15💯2❤1

4 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC≈2,730 views222 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Интересное замечание датских СМИ Борьба с «теневым флотом» обострилась до такой степени, что русские больше не скрываются под ложными флагами. Парадоксально, но это может затруднить остановку судов, перевозящих «черное золото» Energy Today без VPN: MAX / сайт

💯171👍42❤5💩2🤣2

4 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC≈3,100 views101 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Правильно, потому что под своим флагом ходить надо.

💯80👍21

4 Nov 2026, 02:16 UTC≈3,350 views140 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

🇺🇸 USS Enterprise CVN-65 — первый атомный авианосец — покинул свой причал у пирса 2 судостроительного завода Newport News и был отбуксирован в Мобил, штат Алабама, для утилизации. Вот так медленно и печально заканчивается история во многом выдающегося корабля. 🔹Первый атомный авианосец: Введён в эксплуатацию 25 ноября 1961 года и стал первым в мире авианосцем с ядерной силовой установкой. 🔹Уникальная энергетическа…

🔥96🫡29👍10❤5

4 Nov 2026, 02:16 UTC≈3,880 views87 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Ну че уж там—корабль великий во всех смыслах, Big E. Давно уже неактуален. Но легендарный. Вышло их время давно уже, в 1980-х, просто тогда никто не верил. Ну кроме командиров ПЛАРК пр. 949А и летчиков МРА, пока Союз не развалился и ВМФ СССР прекратил существование вместе с МРА.

👍75🤔10❤1🤮1

4 Nov 2026, 01:05 UTC≈3,680 views323 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Когда снизу постучали. Борис Корчевников всерьёз сравнивает жертв Великой Отечественной войны со вчерашним хохлёнком. И называет последнего «святым русским мучеником»🤦‍♀️

🤬199🙉62🤯34🤮9🤷‍♀8💩6❤2🤔2

4 Nov 2026, 01:05 UTC≈3,960 views99 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Дно полное, кретины. Это росмедийка.

😡67💯22👍5🤷‍♀4🤮1

4 Nov 2026, 00:33 UTC≈3,990 views195 reactionsread 4 November 2026

🤬Канада не даст российским хоккеистам визы для участия в молодежном чемпионате мира. Премьер-министр страны Марк Карни прямо заявил, что сборной РФ не будет на турнире. "Если вы спрашиваете конкретно о молодежном чемпионате мира, россиян там не будет", - сказал Карни. Канадские власти заявили, что воспользуются иммиграционными полномочиями, чтобы не допустить въезда российских и белорусских спортсменов для выступле…

🤬93🤷‍♂48🥴19💩15🤡6❤4🖕3🤣3

4 Nov 2026, 00:33 UTC≈4,010 views88 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Ну а что от них еще ожидать.

🥴48🤷‍♀24💯11😁4🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @AMartyanovVersion_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Andrei Martyanov 2.0” (@AMartyanovVersion_2), 7,763 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AMartyanovVersion_2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.