Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for A New Day ✨

Channel

A New Day ✨

@ANewDay144

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,628subscribers

+235 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001495205573
TypeChannel
Username@ANewDay144
Description“Do ye not comprehend that we are worms born to bring forth the angelic butterfly?” — Dante Alighieri https://www.instagram.com/hegenguyen17?igsh=NWFvcGJjODY0bmh3&utm_source=qr
Created11 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ANewDay144

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,3757,6287,501.56 August 2026 — 7,393 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,393 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,395 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,396 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,405 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,403 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,401 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,408 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,407 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,391 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,375 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,384 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,385 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,425 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,470 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,528 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,547 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,608 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,605 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,593 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,592 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,599 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,610 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,623 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,628 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net +235. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,337–7,666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 00:067,628+5
3 Nov 2026, 17:217,623+13
31 Oct 2026, 13:177,610+11
28 Oct 2026, 23:557,599+7
25 Oct 2026, 17:007,592-1
22 Oct 2026, 17:007,593-12
19 Oct 2026, 13:367,605-3
16 Oct 2026, 03:267,608+61
12 Oct 2026, 20:187,547+19
5 Oct 2026, 22:217,528+58
28 Sept 2026, 16:577,470+45
18 Sept 2026, 13:597,425+40
14 Sept 2026, 04:587,385+1
10 Sept 2026, 10:377,384+9
29 Aug 2026, 21:067,375-16
27 Aug 2026, 06:127,391-16
24 Aug 2026, 12:077,407-1
21 Aug 2026, 05:187,408+7
18 Aug 2026, 15:537,401-2
15 Aug 2026, 18:477,403first reading

Engagement

325 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 7,628 subscribers
Avg views / post
897
111 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
111
of 325 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held325 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total99,621
Reactions total4,235
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 00:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈27,900
Videos
≈1,730
Links
≈5,540

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
21m 48s
Average length
1m 22s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,117 reactions across 321 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,88638.4%
💯1,28712.7%
🔥1,21212.0%
❤‍🔥9859.74%
🙏8138.04%
🥰5135.07%
⚡3193.15%
🕊2642.61%
🤩2112.09%
🎉1911.89%
👏1821.80%
👀1010.998%
🤗550.544%
😇400.395%
😭210.208%
🤯150.148%
😍130.128%
😘70.069%
🍾20.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 321 of the 325 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 325 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 111 posts held from the last 30 days (11.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 21:29 UTC380 views22 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😍11💯6🤩4❤1

6 Nov 2026, 21:25 UTC351 views18 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🕊8❤7🤗2❤‍🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 20:51 UTC410 views32 reactionsread 7 November 2026

[cont’d] Unequivocally, Trump is both aware of Q and posting Q related things. This can't be denied, or dismissed as horoscopes, it can only be dismissed through selection bias. It's very easy to prove, he hung this Q painting by @KAGdrogo at Trump National Golf Club in Los Angeles. This to me means A, that Q is real or B, he is pandering to his "trust the plan" followers. The B option would be tremendously cynical …

❤18❤‍🔥10💯4

6 Nov 2026, 20:50 UTC380 views17 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

I am not a full Q believer. I have the unfortunate brain of believing in very little in general. A "trust, but verify" brain. Too many aspects of Q I can't verify. I will entertain the idea of Q, which to many binary thinkers makes me a a believer in Q. I AM NOT. Q is very easy to dismiss when viewed selectively. Elements are fuzzy. Can be dismissed as either a ball of yarn for conspiracy theorists or as a pacifi…

❤12💯3👀2

6 Nov 2026, 20:34 UTC798 views38 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤32🙏5😭1

6 Nov 2026, 20:25 UTC496 views35 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤18🔥13👏2💯2

6 Nov 2026, 20:24 UTC391 views30 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤23❤‍🔥7

6 Nov 2026, 19:10 UTC573 views31 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯25⚡3❤3

6 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC560 views25 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰17🎉6🤩2

6 Nov 2026, 19:02 UTC565 views26 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰16🔥9❤1

6 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC465 views13 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰12❤1

6 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC614 views29 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰16🔥10❤2🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 325 posts we hold for @ANewDay144. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 52 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

American Patriot 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@ishjay1960 · 29,302
25 posts
🪴Shaelynn Dee ☀️
@CommonSenseCanada · 99
18 posts
Sam I Am @livinginharmony
@LivingInHarmony · 65
15 posts
WHITE News
@WhiteNews22 · 22
9 posts
Jodi and Julee’s Political Channel
@jodispangler · 73
9 posts
Tironianae 🍊 🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet
@Tironianae · 52,543
6 posts
PatriotGApeach
@PatriotGApeach_channel · 23
5 posts
WE THE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE (Aron Walton)
@wethepeopleww · 18,084
4 posts
BEHIND THE SCENES
@Behindthescenes5665 · 1,359
3 posts
Channel 203
@Channel203Chat · 7,262
3 posts
Lady Liberty Lashes N’ Lattes Decode Dump
@ladylibertylashes · 2,413
3 posts
FlyingWings
@only4FlyingWings · 14
3 posts
❤️🇺🇸🌎🍊ULTRA FarRight TrumpGirl 🇺🇸🌎❤️
@traceytray17 · 5,137
3 posts
MAYHEM MEL NEWS
@Justmayhem · 11,273
2 posts
🌹TooTallRN VeteransAlways🌹
@TooTallRN · 4,405
2 posts
MaRaKiMU, QC (Official)
@marakimuqcofficial · 16
2 posts
Patriot Princess 777
@patriot_princess · 38,832
2 posts
Phil Godlewski 4.0
@philgodlewskii4 · 2,008,969
2 posts
LegeNet
@realLegeNet · 281
2 posts
4519Anon
@Anon4519TG · 29
1 post
Dr. Scott Young-END THE FED
@DrScottNESARA · 29,810
1 post
🔥Embers from Ash🌻
@EmbersfromAsh · 2,075
1 post
1000x More
@FaithfulFreedom · 57
1 post
GESARA Show Intel ️Channel
@GESARA_Show_Intel · 15,879
1 post
GESARA NEDERLAND (officiële kanaal) 🙏 HET GROTE ONTWAKEN 🙏 THE GREAT AWAKENING 🙏❤️🤗
@GesaraNederland · 7,682
1 post
Gising Maharlika Official
@Gisingmaharlikaofficial · 558
1 post
Hoover Dam & Lake Havasu Cabal Connection
@HooverDamLakeHavasu · 340
1 post
Earth Guardians - Australia & New Zealand
@KingdomofAusNZ · 451
1 post
🗡♾️✨LQTL✨🗝🌹
@LadyofTheLake17 · 1,751
1 post
🌺🌸Love Joy & Happy Vibes🌸🌺
@LoveJoyHappyVibes · 10
1 post
MidnightStarseeds
@MidnightStarseeds · 27
1 post
Papa Squatch 123
@PapaSquatchAwakening · 136
1 post
Patriots Rising
@PatriotsRising1 · 30,921
1 post
Rinus Verhagen
@RinusVerhagen · 6,073
1 post
Rubix Q 🫡 🐸🚨🪖🛸👽 NCSWIC ✨777☝️🙏
@RubixQ · 4,102
1 post
Tekla
@Tekla0107 · 28
1 post
The Trump-Q Chronicles 🇺🇸✨
@TheTrumpQChronicles · 185
1 post
Cats Quips 2
@catsquips2 · 25
1 post
The Conscious Broadcast
@consciousbroadcast · 23
1 post
Daily Wonders and Magic
@dailywondersandmagic · 17
1 post
Jaydee
@freespirit_17 · 4
1 post
m r s s o m e o n e
@motherascendingchat · 27
1 post
ĶĄŔĘÑ ĢØŘĐÖ⭐🛡🇺🇸
@ncswic1776Godwins · 112
1 post
(P) Oakley - Qonnected -
@pOakley · 5,105
1 post
Faith, Freedom & Family
@pilbarafreedomkeepers · 65
1 post
Pixiedust Chronicles🪄🪄
@pixiedusthope · 4,696
1 post
Shelly's Truth & Wisdom Channel
@shellystruthandwisdom · 51
1 post
The British Perspective
@thebritishperspective · 75
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Alexander Quinn - Ascension Channel
@alexanderquinn1 · 20,117
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 27 September 2026
144,000 Light Warriors
@DavideB144 · 29,968
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 7 September 2026
Kab
@KabamurTaygeta · 23,788
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 17 September 2026
Cosmic Light Force
@drue86 · 51,411
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 24 August 2026
Beautiful universe
@BeautifulUniverse11 · 20,950
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 25 September 2026
Sapphire Skye 5D OFFICIAL💜💟
@SapphireSkyeOfficial · 31,270
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 6 September 2026
Think Positive Words
@thinkpositivewords · 35,655
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
Sadhguru
@Sadhguru · 22,476
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
David Avocado Wolfe
@davidavocadowolfe · 101,587
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
AyurQuest Channel
@ayurquest · 21,505
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“A New Day ✨” (@ANewDay144), 7,628 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ANewDay144.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.