Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ATTAC España

Channel

ATTAC España

@ATTACEspana

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

520subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001073078885
TypeChannel
Username@ATTACEspana
CreatedBetween 1 October 2016 and 31 July 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ATTACEspana

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5205225216 August 2026 — 521 subscribers6 August 2026 — 521 subscribers23 August 2026 — 522 subscribers30 August 2026 — 521 subscribers8 September 2026 — 520 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 520–522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 18:16520-1
30 Aug 2026, 17:04521-1
23 Aug 2026, 22:05522+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:47521no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:39521first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1339.4%
👏927.3%
721.2%
🤬412.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC192 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📉 Elimina los umbrales de participación accionarial que controlaban las exenciones fiscales entre empresas 🔬 Amplía las exenciones a los gastos en I+D 📝 Sustituye los controles previos por la autodeclaración empresarial 💰 Costará 5.300 millones de euros al año solo por la exención del impuesto de retención 📊 El contraste: La UE pierde entre 210.000 y 250.000 millones de euros al año por elusión y evasión fiscal tran

🤬2

21 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC319 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🌍 La fuga de los tecnólogos libertarios: de Silicon Valley a los enclaves del Sur Los arquitectos de la vigilancia digital global están abandonando Estados Unidos en busca de territorios sin rendición de cuentas democrática. 🏝 Roatán (Honduras): la ciudad-estado Próspera reunió 120 millones de dólares... y demandó al país por 10.000 millones cuando este recuperó su soberanía legal. 🇦🇷 Argentina: Peter Thiel, cofunda

👍1

17 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC376 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🌍 ¿UN MUNDO RICO SIN CRECIMIENTO? El equipo de Thomas Piketty publica el Global Justice Report, y sus conclusiones desafían el sentido común económico dominante. 💰 60.000 €/año de renta para toda la población mundial, un objetivo que consideran viable ⏱️ Reducir la jornada laboral de 2.100 a 1.000 horas anuales para 2100 🥩 -25% en el consumo de carne a nivel global ⚖️ Financiado gravando a quienes más tienen, no con

👍2

16 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC237 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚖️ El impuesto que aterroriza a los multimillonarios California quiere gravar, con un impuesto único de hasta el 5%, los patrimonios superiores a 1.000 millones de dólares. La propuesta ya puede entrar en la papeleta electoral de noviembre de 2026. 💰 ¿A dónde iría el dinero? 90% → sanidad 10% → educación y alimentación 📉 El truco de siempre El multimillonario típico apenas tiene "ingresos" fiscales: vive de plusval

👏3

15 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC243 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🇪🇺 ¿Seguridad para quién? Hemos firmado, junto a más de 50 organizaciones europeas, una carta abierta al Parlamento Europeo y a los gobiernos de la UE sobre el presupuesto 2028-2034. 📌 Lo que pedimos: 1. Rechazar los 131.000 millones de euros para defensa, seguridad y espacio. 2. Redirigir esos fondos a sanidad, vivienda, educación, cuidados y clima. 3. Proteger los fondos civiles de la UE frente a la apropiación m

👏21

11 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC287 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⛏️ La minería metálica, motor oculto del caos geopolítico Litio, cobalto, níquel, tierras raras: los minerales que sostienen la economía verde, la digitalización y la industria militar se han convertido en el centro de la disputa global entre EEUU y China. ⚔️ Ante la pérdida de hegemonía económica frente a China, EEUU y sus aliados despliegan guerra arancelaria, proteccionismo, tratados de materias primas críticas y

👏1

8 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC340 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📉 El fin de la hiperglobalización y el resurgimiento del imperialismo. Publicamos un análisis en profundidad sobre el colapso del sistema comercial "basado en normas" y lo que viene después. 🏛️ La OMC, paralizada El Órgano de Apelación lleva bloqueado desde 2019. EEUU ha vetado nuevos nombramientos 91 veces. Mientras tanto, se normalizan los acuerdos plurilaterales sin mandato ni consenso. 🌍 El nuevo imperialismo

2

5 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC285 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

¿Qué tipo de libertad protege la renta básica? Solemos debatirla en términos técnicos: cuánto cuesta, cómo se financia… pero la pregunta de fondo es otra: qué relaciones de poder transforma. Defendemos una libertad entendida no solo como ausencia de interferencia, sino como no-dominación: nadie es libre si depende de que un jefe, un casero, un acreedor o una autoridad “se porte bien” con él para poder vivir. Una r

3👍1

1 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC354 viewsread 6 August 2026

Cuando el CEO de BlackRock dice que el viejo modelo de capitalismo global se está desmoronando, merece la pena prestar atención, aunque no por lo que parece. La historia reciente muestra un patrón: el capitalismo no suele colapsar, muta. Tras la Gran Depresión aceptó más intervención estatal. Tras los años setenta, se giró contra los trabajadores con el neoliberalismo. Tras 2008, rescató a la banca e infló los preci

27 Jun 2026, 07:00 UTC349 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📡 Newsletter ATTAC | Junio 2026 Cerramos el curso con una reflexión incómoda y varios frentes abiertos. Os contamos. ✍️ Alzad la mirada La visita papal paralizó Madrid mientras se aplaudía un discurso ambiguo que condena la guerra y el racismo pero esquiva nombrar la causa: el capitalismo, la explotación, la injusticia. Y para quien no cree, el sistema ofrece sucedáneos igual de contemplativos pero más vistosos, c

👍2

26 Jun 2026, 12:32 UTC340 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://espacio-publico.com/la-gran-fuga-de-los-tecnologos-libertarios-de-silicon-valley-a-los-enclaves-del-sur

25 Jun 2026, 18:37 UTC253 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

¿Quién decide cómo se gestiona la educación pública en Madrid, y con qué modelo? Recomendamos este debate Más Madrid, PSOE, IU-Madrid y Podemos responden a las preguntas planteadas por tres personas cualificadas en las etapas de Infantil, Reglada y Universitaria. Un material que aporta argumentos y contexto en un momento en que se habla de huelga general educativa en la Comunidad de Madrid. Frente a la deriva priva

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ATTACEspana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ATTAC España” (@ATTACEspana), 520 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ATTACEspana.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.