Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
41 measurements spanning 87 days, net -8,837. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,538–13,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 12:20
2,864
-127
30 Oct 2026, 21:06
2,991
-479
27 Oct 2026, 23:27
3,470
-59
25 Oct 2026, 07:49
3,529
-24
22 Oct 2026, 09:17
3,553
-52
18 Oct 2026, 22:16
3,605
-12
16 Oct 2026, 01:18
3,617
-22
13 Oct 2026, 00:05
3,639
-59
6 Oct 2026, 13:59
3,698
-48
29 Sept 2026, 16:19
3,746
-96
19 Sept 2026, 11:57
3,842
-428
14 Sept 2026, 20:22
4,270
-1,182
11 Sept 2026, 16:17
5,452
-5,476
8 Sept 2026, 23:21
10,928
-578
5 Sept 2026, 16:57
11,506
-3
3 Sept 2026, 18:19
11,509
-5
2 Sept 2026, 12:14
11,514
-12
1 Sept 2026, 12:04
11,526
-16
31 Aug 2026, 10:44
11,542
-16
30 Aug 2026, 07:23
11,558
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 28 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
427 reactions across 17 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
80
18.7%
🎉
50
11.7%
👍
39
9.13%
🐳
38
8.90%
🤩
37
8.67%
🍾
33
7.73%
🔥
32
7.49%
👏
26
6.09%
🙏
24
5.62%
💯
21
4.92%
🥰
13
3.04%
😍
12
2.81%
🆒
5
1.17%
🫡
4
0.937%
⚡
3
0.703%
😁
3
0.703%
😭
3
0.703%
🤡
2
0.468%
🌚
1
0.234%
👀
1
0.234%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2025 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤪 2X. There is dip at 450k and i'm waiting for it again. DYOR
Update: maybe 300k dip or skip
⚪️ Tax 3/3
📊 GMGN • DEX • OKX
🔥 CA: 0x683E47895180595286ED52c5Fb9f29e861fa6666
🌐Web | 💬Telegram | 💬 Twitter
➡️ This is not investment advice, and I am not accepting advertising fees!
👍 17b get 0.3b allo 👊
⚪ Launching 13/7 at 12h utc
🔥 CA:
0x683E47895180595286ED52c5Fb9f29e861fa6666
🔥 Gmgn.ai/bsc/token/0x683E47895180595286ED52c5Fb9f29e861fa6666
🔥 https://www.dextools.io/app/bnb/pair-explorer/0xdbe5e5749a55df6cd52b20b0a31b9ffcafb59aac
https://t.me/GodziBNB
Aped a bag here. Sunday the king (bnb) sideway why not. Now 1.5b get 0.3b allocation but still 1 hour left. Maybe need 26bnb to get it. They have deformity tokenomics but dw, for me Squirrel posted so its safe
BabyAnsem dev previous u know what should do. DYOR 😁
https://www.cheesepad.ai/sale/bsc/0x5425bCCC849062f54D6aDF8c1bBD88532B7BF4c0
➡️ This is not investment advice, and I am not accepting advertising fees!
⚡️⚡️ HEALTH - PULSE APP
#Dyor #NFA
📱 The era of the HEALTH ecosystem is just getting started!
📱 is shaping the future of healthcare.
🔗 Web3 is unlocking the value of health data.
✅ New narrative
✅ New opportunities
✅ New future
As AI and blockchain continue to converge, the healthcare industry could become one of the biggest beneficiaries of this transformation.
📌 We're looking for builders, supporters, and …
Mùng 1 sớm mai, mùng 2 đầu tháng. Kính chúc tất cả mọi người có thật nhiều sức khoẻ và gặp nhiều thuận lợi trong công việc. Cùng nhau tận hưởng tháng cuối năm bên nhau, chuẩn bị hành trang để bước sang năm Thiên Mã 🐎
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
✨✨ Mùng 1 sớm mai mùng 2 đầu tháng, kính chúc toàn thể ae tháng này bú kèo lụm nhiều Sol, Bnb và Eth nhé! Đặc biệt giữ sức khỏe để tiêu tiền nha ae, lại 1 năm cũ sắp qua 😳
❤10🍾10💯10🎉9👍9🙏7🐳4👏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @AZOG_Calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @AZOG_Calls as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
1 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Next 100X GEMS @NEXT100XGEMS · 39,100 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AZOG Gems Calls 💎” (@AZOG_Calls), 2,864 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AZOG_Calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.