Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Accident On Road

Channel

Accident On Road

@AccidentOnRoad

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,354subscribers

+773 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001505205000
TypeChannel
Username@AccidentOnRoad
DescriptionMy second channel: https://t.me/+geQOszQZGKM5M2Uy The main automotive channel, videos of the most resonant traffic accidents and incidents🔞 Take care of yourself and learn from the mistakes of others! Owner: @Java_7_7_7
CreatedBetween 1 February 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/AccidentOnRoad

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,5819,3548,967.57 August 2026 — 8,581 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,581 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,582 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,607 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,632 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,665 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,689 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,748 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,765 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,797 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,836 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,868 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,902 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,910 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,965 subscribers25 September 2026 — 9,086 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,137 subscribers10 October 2026 — 9,183 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,198 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,224 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,246 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,261 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,276 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,301 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,317 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,354 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 89 days, net +773. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,465–9,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 05:469,354+37
1 Nov 2026, 11:389,317+16
29 Oct 2026, 21:019,301+25
26 Oct 2026, 10:169,276+15
23 Oct 2026, 03:109,261+15
20 Oct 2026, 09:069,246+22
17 Oct 2026, 07:469,224+26
14 Oct 2026, 08:379,198+15
10 Oct 2026, 20:579,183+46
5 Oct 2026, 01:579,137+51
25 Sept 2026, 19:429,086+121
17 Sept 2026, 12:008,965+55
13 Sept 2026, 04:598,910+8
9 Sept 2026, 00:178,902+34
3 Sept 2026, 20:178,868+32
31 Aug 2026, 02:238,836+39
28 Aug 2026, 02:588,797+32
25 Aug 2026, 07:528,765+17
22 Aug 2026, 17:048,748+59
19 Aug 2026, 12:248,689first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.2%
avg views ÷ 9,354 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,570
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.467%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held40 (15 May 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total21,424
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 21:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
26
Videos
449
Links
408

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
13m 04s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,148 reactions across 40 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20417.8%
😱15613.6%
❤13812.0%
😢1149.93%
🤯665.75%
🔥554.79%
🤬544.70%
🤡423.66%
🤣423.66%
🙏413.57%
🕊353.05%
🥴332.87%
😭272.35%
🆒181.57%
🗿141.22%
🤷‍♂121.05%
😨110.958%
🙈90.784%
🥰90.784%
🤨80.697%
21 further kinds605.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 40 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
46
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AccidentOnRoad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 May 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 22:32 UTC574 views11 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

‼️Even perfect driving doesn't save you! Sometimes the road throws surprises without warning☝️ 😌 My second psychology channel — understand people, understand yourself

🤯4🙏4🤡2🥴1

27 Oct 2026, 03:19 UTC≈2,310 views23 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Tragedy in Romania 🇷🇴 ⚡️A driver caused a fatal traffic accident in which his entire family died. The man himself and five passengers died at the scene of the accident😢 😌 My second psychology channel — understand people, understand yourself

😱13🤬4❤3🔥2🕊1

18 Oct 2026, 23:11 UTC≈4,050 views17 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

A serious accident occurred in Somalia ⚠️ ⚡️A young man heading home survived by a literal miracle🙏 Two people died in the traffic accident, and six others were taken to the hospital with injuries ❌ 😌 My second psychology channel — understand people, understand yourself

🙏8🤯4❤1❤‍🔥1👍1👏1🥰1

11 Oct 2026, 03:47 UTC≈5,290 views22 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Fatal traffic accident in Turkey🇹🇷 ⚡️A truck collided with a passenger car in front of a checkpoint. As a result of the accident, the driver and passenger of the car died at the scene 😢 😌 My second psychology channel — understand people, understand yourself

😱11❤2💩2🤯2😢2🤷1🥰1😁1

8 Oct 2026, 02:31 UTC≈5,090 views18 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

‼️Toyota withstood an RPG shot and saved a Filipino mayor💣 On the morning of January 25, an attack was carried out on a Filipino mayor — he was shot with an RPG, but the armored Toyota Land Cruiser withstood the direct hit from the projectile, protecting the passenger. 💥You can't imagine better advertising for Toyota ☝️ 😌 My second psychology channel — understand people, understand yourself

🔥7👍3👏2🆒2❤1👌1🕊1🥰1

6 Oct 2026, 17:24 UTC≈4,110 views9 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

👁 USEFUL PSYCHOLOGICAL TRICKS 🟡 1. The phrase “I know you probably won’t agree” increases the likelihood that the person will agree. 🟡 2. If you want someone to tell you the truth, make them laugh before asking the question. 🟡 3. If you think someone is lying to you, look them in the eyes and say nothing. 🟡 4. When talking to someone, occasionally use their name during the conversation. This way, they will listen…

❤3👍2👏1💊1💩1🔥1

30 Sept 2026, 22:40 UTC≈4,540 views20 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Tragic incident in Vietnam🇻🇳 A motorcyclist died after colliding with a taut cable near an industrial facility. At the time of the incident, workers were moving heavy machinery, and the obstacle appeared suddenly. ⚡️The driver was traveling at high speed and did not have time to react, ultimately losing his head 🤯 😌 My second psychology channel — understand people, understand yourself

😢8🥴5❤4🔥1🤨1🤯1

30 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC≈4,400 views19 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

🇺🇸 In the US, there are unique fire trucks – tiller trucks, which can turn literally sideways 🚒 ☝️They have two drivers: one operates from the front, while the other controls the rear axle from the trailer cabin. Before maneuvering, the rear driver moves to the adjacent lane so that no one gets in the way. ⚡️This ensures maximum maneuverability on narrow city streets and allows long trucks with ladders and equipmen…

👍11❤4👏2🔥1🆒1

29 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTC≈3,990 views10 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🫵 ARE YOU SURE YOU REALLY UNDERSTAND PEOPLE? 🟡Why does someone suddenly change the way they treat you? 🟡How can you tell when someone is lying to you? 🟡What is really hiding behind their gestures, gaze, and tone of voice? 🟡How do people influence your decisions and emotions without you even noticing? I created my OWN second channel where I explore psychology, manipulation, body language, emotions, and the hidden me…

❤3👍3💩3🔥1

28 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC≈3,810 views19 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Car accident in California 🇺🇸 A man was hit by a police car! ⚡️The victim was hospitalized in critical condition🏥 😌 My second psychology channel — understand people, understand yourself

🤬11🗿3💊2👍1🤝1😢1

27 Sept 2026, 07:04 UTC≈4,000 views26 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

⚡️If you had a bad day, then watch this video and you will see what a bad day looks like ☝️ 😌 My second psychology channel — understand people, understand yourself

🤯11🤬10❤2👍2😢1

26 Sept 2026, 16:16 UTC≈3,960 views14 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

⚠️ Driver's blind spot + blind pedestrian and the encounter was inevitable😢 😌 My second psychology channel — understand people, understand yourself

😭8🕊4👀1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @AccidentOnRoad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Jun 2026, 01:49 UTCAnonymous Poll83 voters

📊I’d love to learn more about your experience with crypto 🫠 Are you familiar with cryptocurrencies?

  1. Yes, I invest and keep part of my capital in crypto28%
  2. Yes, I know about crypto, but I don’t invest17%
  3. I’ve heard about it, but I don’t know much16%
  4. No, I know almost nothing about cryptocurrencies40%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

اختبارات قياس
@qiyas_3 · 22,864
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Accident On Road” (@AccidentOnRoad), 9,354 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AccidentOnRoad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.