Channel
@AhlusSunnah3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,519subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001342762929 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AhlusSunnah3 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AhlusSunnah3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 2,519 | +13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 2,506 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 2,506 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 August 2026 – 12 September 2026) |
| Views total | 7,469 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Shaykh ‘Abdullâh as-Sa’d فك الله أسره said: The people of ‘Irâq used to ask ibn ‘Abbâs, so he would say to them: “How are you asking me, while Ibn Umm ad-Dahmâ’ is among you?” Meaning, Sa’îd Ibn Jubayr, whom al-Hajjâj wrongfully killed.
Shaykh Abû ‘Alî al-Hasanî said: The narrations prohibiting dyeing with black are not authentic. It is confirmed from a group of the Sahâbah that they dyed their hair black, among them were: Sa’d ibn Abî Waqqâs, ‘Uqbah ibn ‘Âmir, Jarîr ibn ‘Abdillâh, ‘Amr ibn al-‘Âs, al-Husayn ibn ‘Alî and al-Hasan ibn ‘Alî. Likewise, a group of the Tâbi’în permitted dyeing with black, such as ibn Sîrîn, al-Hasan al-Basrî, Abû Sala…
Shaykh Sulaymân al-‘Alwân فك الله أسره said: Every Hadîth narrated concerning Sûrah Yâ-Sîn is weak, without exception.
‘Atâ’ ibn Abî Rabâh said: “I met two hundred of the companions of the Prophet ﷺ. When the Imâm said: ‘Walad-Dâllîn,’ I heard a loud noise from them as they said Âmîn.” Is’hâq said: And likewise ‘Ikrimah said: “I met the people in this Masjid; they would make a loud noise as they said Âmîn.” ‘Atâ’ said: “Ibn az-Zubayr led us in Salâh in Masjid al-Harâm, so when he said ‘Walad-Dâllîn,’ I heard the people of the Masji…
The Dhikr of Entering the Masjid and Leaving from it. Abu Usayd said: The Messenger of Allâh ﷺ said: When any one of you enters the Masjid, let him say: “O Allâh, open for me the gates of Your mercy.” اللَّهُمَّ افْتَحْ لِي أَبْوَابَ رَحْمَتِكَ And when he leaves let him say: “O Allâh, I ask You of Your bounty.” اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ مِنْ فَضْلِكَ [Narrated by Muslim] As for what has been narrated in the …
Hudhayfah رضي الله عنه said: Whenever the Prophet ﷺ intended to go to bed, he would say: “With Your name, O Allâh, I die and I live.” «بِاسْمِكَ اللَّهُمَّ أَمُوتُ وَأَحْيَا». And when he woke up from his sleep, he would say: “All Praise is due to Allâh Who has restored to us life after causing us to die, and to Him is the resurrection.” «الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الَّذِي أَحْيَانَا بَعْدَمَا أَمَاتَنَا وَإِلَيْهِ النُّشُو…
He mentions the statement of Imâm Abû ‘Umar Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdillâh al-Andalusî al-Tulamankî al-Mâlikî: He said in his two-volume book, al-Usûl: “The Muslims of Ahlus-Sunnah unanimously agreed that Allâh rose over His Throne by His essence.” He also mentioned in this book: “Ahlus-Sunnah unanimously agreed that Allâh is above the Throne in reality, not metaphorically.” Then he narrated with his chain from Mâlik that…
Imâm Ahmad explicitly stated the authenticity of the Hadîth, and refuted these misinterpretations. So he said in the narration of Is’hâq Ibn Mansûr: “Do not disparage the face, for indeed Allâh created Âdam in His image”. [He said]: It is Sahîh. He [Imâm Ahmad] said in the narration of Abû Tâlib: “Whoever says that Allâh created Âdam in the image of Âdam, then he is a Jahmî. And what image did Âdam have before He c…
Imâm Mâlik and others from the Salaf and Khalaf said: “Everything that is worshipped besides Allâh is a Tâghût.” ‘Umar ibn al-Khattâb, ibn ‘Abbâs رضي الله عنهما and many of the Scholars of Tafsîr said: “The Tâghût is Shaytân.” Ibn Kathîr said: “This opinion is very strong, as it includes everything the people of Jâhiliyyah were upon; from worshipping idols, seeking judgement from them, and seeking victory through t…
‘Abdullâh ibn Ahmad said: I asked my father about one who says: “When Allâh spoke to Mûsâ, He did not speak with a voice.” So my father said: “Allâh سبحانه spoke with a voice, and these are Ahâdîth that we narrate, just as they have come.” ‘Abdullâh ibn Ahmad said: I heard Abû Ma’mar al-Hudhalî say: “Whoever claims that Allâh does not speak, nor hear, nor see, nor become angry, nor be pleased” -and he mentioned ot…
Ibn al-Bannâ’ al-Hanbalî رحمه الله said: Îmân increases with obedience, and decreases with sin — Îmân itself and its reward. Contrary to the Mu’tazilah: Îmân neither increases nor decreases. Contrary to the Ash’ariyyah: It’s reward increases and decreases, but Îmân itself does not. Our evidence: His statement, تعالى: “And when His verses are recited to them, it increases them in Îmân…” [8:2] And His statement: …
It was said to al-Awzâ’î: Indeed, there is a man who says: “I sit with Ahlus-Sunnah, and I sit with Ahlul-Bid’ah.” So al-Awzâ’î said: “This man wants to equalise between the truth and falsehood.” [Ar-Radd ‘alal-Mubtadi’ah]
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AhlusSunnah3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ahlus-Sunnah” (@AhlusSunnah3), 2,519 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AhlusSunnah3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.