Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 83 days, net -223. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,644–9,933 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Oct 2026, 16:55
9,677
-6
28 Oct 2026, 06:20
9,683
-12
25 Oct 2026, 10:54
9,695
-12
22 Oct 2026, 02:57
9,707
-2
19 Oct 2026, 03:46
9,709
-12
16 Oct 2026, 04:18
9,721
-16
12 Oct 2026, 20:59
9,737
-20
5 Oct 2026, 22:57
9,757
-16
28 Sept 2026, 18:20
9,773
-29
15 Sept 2026, 18:56
9,802
-11
11 Sept 2026, 19:59
9,813
+5
7 Sept 2026, 10:39
9,808
-13
2 Sept 2026, 06:54
9,821
-15
30 Aug 2026, 05:48
9,836
-12
26 Aug 2026, 19:25
9,848
-12
23 Aug 2026, 09:06
9,860
-7
19 Aug 2026, 19:16
9,867
-5
16 Aug 2026, 20:15
9,872
-18
13 Aug 2026, 15:47
9,890
-8
10 Aug 2026, 16:05
9,898
first reading
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.8%
avg views ÷ 9,677 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,430
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held
56 (22 July 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total
28,556
Reactions total
512
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
640
Videos
760
Links
69
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,605 reactions across 56 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
602
37.5%
💔
422
26.3%
👍
105
6.54%
😢
94
5.86%
❤🔥
79
4.92%
😭
69
4.30%
👎
67
4.17%
👌
59
3.68%
🥰
35
2.18%
🕊
22
1.37%
😍
22
1.37%
👏
10
0.623%
😡
10
0.623%
💯
5
0.312%
👀
4
0.249%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,605 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
میم عزیزم
توی یه دنیای دیگه، تو هم من رو دوست داری، همونقدر که من تو رو. با هم زندگی می کنیم، با هم پیر میشیم، با هم می میریم. ما رو کنار هم دفن میکنن، از خاکمون یه سرو بلند قد میکشه تا آسمون، همه پرنده های دنیا میان رو شاخه ها خونه میسازن. تموم میشه آوارگی. سبز می مونیم من و تو، برای همیشه.
boufe koor🤍
" برای لباسهای زیر "
لباسهای زیر عزیزند
برای خیلی ها نوع دیگر
چون یاد آور تختند و هم خوابگی های مکرر
و برای خیلی ها مثل من
یک نوع ذوقند ، یک هم بستگی
لباسهای زیر نجیب هم هستند
رازند
و انگار خود خودمان هستند
طوری به تن می چسبند انگار پوستند
روح دارند
اگر نداشتن بهترینشان برای حالهای خوبمان
سوا نمی شدند
لباسهای زیر
همیشه پنهانند
بوی تن میدهند
بوی خودِ خودمان
لباسهای زیر بیشتر از هرچیز توی این دنیا
اندازه ی آدمها هستند…
به ساعت نگاه کردم.
شش و بیست دقیقه صبح بود.
دوباره خوابیدم. بعد پاشدم. به ساعت نگاه کردم.
شش و بیست دقیقه صبح بود.
فکر کردم: هوا که هنوز تاریکه. حتماً دفعه ی اول اشتباه دیده ام.
خوابیدم.
وقتی پاشدم. هوا روشن بود ولی ساعت باز هم شش و بیست دقیقه صبح بود.
سراسیمه پا شدم. باورم نمی شد که ساعت مرده باشد. به این کارها عادت نداشت. من هم توقع نداشتم.
آدم ها هم مثل ساعت ها هستند.
بعضی ها کنارمان هستند مثل ساعت. مرتب، همیشگ…
متاسفممیم عزیزم.
این که از من فاصله گرفتی تا فاصله ات را با دیگران نزدیک کنی
این که انقدر برایت عادی و حتی خوشایند است که نباشم و تو از این نبودنِ من استفاده کنی
و بعد بگویی که «دوستت دارم»
بگویی «دلم تنگ است»
فقط میتوانم بگویم« متاسفم میم عزیزم»
تمام این مدت در حال لذت بودی و حالا برای دیالوگ های عاشقانهات دیر است.
خوش باش که این خوشی ها زود میگذرد.
boufe koor
اتفاقاً با من دقیقاً شبیه خودم رفتار کن، من اصلاً ناراحت نمیشم. تو هم با من رو راست باش و پنهانکاری نکن. تو هم با من شوخی کن و بخند. تو هم اگر اشتباه کردی قبول کن. تو هم پیش من خودت باش. تو هم با خوشحالی من خوشحال شو و با غم من غمگین. تو هم این اطمینان رو بده اگر جایی لازمت داشتم باشی. تو هم برای من وقت بذار. تو هم رُک باش و زیرو رو برام نکش. تو هم اگر دو جا من اشتباه کردم گذشت کن. تو هم خطاهای من رو بزرگشون نکن و د…
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @Ahsan9S. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کافه ریلکس @CafeReIax · 43,832 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026
کافه قلم @Kaffeeghalam · 21,630 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
•| #نرگس_صرافیان_طوفان |• @narges_sarrafian_toofan · 163,488 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Sep Pod @sepblogmusic · 59,824 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
[ تکست بیو ]️ @TxTBiwo · 36,613 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@Boufe.koor/بوف کور” (@Ahsan9S), 9,677 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ahsan9S.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.