Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AI KRAPIVA

Channel

AI KRAPIVA

@AiKrapiva

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

92subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003200466121
TypeChannel
Username@AiKrapiva
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AiKrapiva

Growth

9298958 August 2026 — 98 subscribers9 August 2026 — 98 subscribers15 August 2026 — 96 subscribers23 August 2026 — 95 subscribers29 August 2026 — 94 subscribers8 September 2026 — 92 subscribers8 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91–99 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 04:0092-2
29 Aug 2026, 01:5894-1
23 Aug 2026, 02:3795-1
15 Aug 2026, 18:5796-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:1898no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:3098first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

199 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7638.2%
🔥6231.2%
4522.6%
custom 5274196749743849242136.53%
custom 527605921077215172131.51%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 10 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 May 2026, 12:26 UTC17 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, мы теперь в ВК! Подпишитесь, чтобы ничего не пропустить: ▪️выгодные акции, ▪️интересные розыгрыши ▪️и самые свежие работы Только для подписчиков! Подписаться на ВК⚪️ЖМИ СЮДА 🤩🤩🤩🤩AI KRAPIVA

3👍1custom 52741967497438492421custom 52760592107721517211

5 Mar 2026, 07:10 UTC159 views77 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Благородство вне времени 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ Привет! AI KRAPIVA на связи. Мы продолжаем тему русского дворянства — но в современной, смелой, глубокой интерпретации. Это не просто нейрофотосессия. 1️⃣Это образ, в котором оживает внутренняя сила. 2️⃣Это стиль, в котором читается характер. 3️⃣Это взгляд, в котором — достоинство. Русское дворянство сегодня — это не про прошлое. Это про женщину, которая знает себе цену

👍29🔥2816custom 52741967497438492423custom 52760592107721517211

3 Mar 2026, 09:16 UTC217 views63 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Лучший подарок маме и бабушке — не цветы.. ✖️✖️✖️✖️❤️✖️✖️✖️✖️ Привет! Сегодня у нас особенная нейрофотосессия Знакомьтесь — две потрясающе красивые сестры: Василиса и Вероника Разные ретро-образы, нежные детали, взгляд, в котором — любовь, доверие и та самая родственная близость, которую невозможно сыграть. 👉Нейрофото — это не просто “картинка” Это возможность: — сохранить детство таким, каким вы его чувствуете —

👍2418🔥16custom 52741967497438492424custom 52760592107721517211

19 Feb 2026, 13:21 UTC201 views53 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Графиня нашего времени..Какая она? 🍁❤️🍁❤️🍁❤️🍁❤️🍁❤️🍁 Привет. Какая она — графиня нашего времени? Красивая. Современная. Уверенная в себе. Та, что живёт в ритме XXI века, но бережно хранит стиль и традиции аристократии. ⚫️Сегодня у нас нейрофотосессия для прекрасной, очаровательной и потрясающей Марии. В девяти образах мы раскрыли её утончённость, благородство и невероятную внутреннюю силу женской энергии. Каждый

👍22🔥188custom 52741967497438492425

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @AiKrapiva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AI KRAPIVA” (@AiKrapiva), 92 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AiKrapiva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.