Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AIK_HT

Channel

AIK_HT

@Aik_Hookah_Time

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

8,069subscribers

+215 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001781896393
TypeChannel
Username@Aik_Hookah_Time
DescriptionОснователь: • Уникальной франшизной сети заведений и магазинов HookahTime и HookahTimeShop 📈 • Самого крупного кальянного блога в мире Hookah Time • Веду здоровый образ жизни, но совмещаю спорт с вредными привычками 💨
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Aik_Hookah_Time

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,6458,9008,272.57 August 2026 — 7,854 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,854 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,853 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,832 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,815 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,801 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,792 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,775 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,769 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,763 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,751 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,720 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,708 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,669 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,645 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,866 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,507 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,900 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,697 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,537 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,433 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,345 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,092 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,069 subscribers8,0697 August 20266 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net +215. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,457–9,088 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 02:498,069-23
2 Nov 2026, 17:218,092-253
30 Oct 2026, 16:578,345-88
27 Oct 2026, 11:298,433-104
24 Oct 2026, 12:448,537-160
21 Oct 2026, 10:178,697-203
18 Oct 2026, 01:568,900+393
14 Oct 2026, 15:308,507+641
10 Oct 2026, 19:017,866+221
4 Oct 2026, 23:167,645-24
25 Sept 2026, 15:177,669-39
15 Sept 2026, 13:387,708-12
12 Sept 2026, 03:387,720-31
7 Sept 2026, 13:577,751-12
2 Sept 2026, 15:557,763-6
30 Aug 2026, 07:557,769-6
27 Aug 2026, 07:067,775-17
24 Aug 2026, 12:277,792-9
20 Aug 2026, 17:337,801-14
17 Aug 2026, 09:377,815first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.4%
avg views ÷ 8,069 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held37 (13 April 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total28,262
Reactions total377
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 23:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
286
Videos
213
Links
149

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
36m 31s
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,679 reactions across 37 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥65338.9%
❤36021.4%
👍28917.2%
😁1569.29%
🤣643.81%
👏633.75%
❤‍🔥372.20%
🤯80.476%
💯70.417%
🤩60.357%
🤮50.298%
🍾30.179%
👎30.179%
💔30.179%
😱30.179%
🥰30.179%
🍓20.119%
🤝20.119%
🤡20.119%
🥴20.119%
7 further kinds80.476%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,679 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,190 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Все хотят Jet, а я хочу вот это ✈️ 💨

🤣9❤4👍3🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 14:12 UTC622 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤1

6 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC420 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

HT №288 ТОП 10 САМЫХ ДОРОГИХ КАЛЬЯНОВ В МИРЕ Золото, бриллианты, карбон и ценники с неприличным количеством нулей 💸 Собрал десятку дорогущих кальянов — от дизайнерских моделей до уникальных ювелирных экземпляров. Обсудим материалы, внешний вид и удобство. И, конечно, узнаем их РЕАЛЬНУЮ стоимость❗️ 1. Desvall Royal Diamond 2. Aurentum Switzerland Hookah 3. Maklaud J.K.R 4. Kaloud Krysalis Monarch 5. Meduse Design …

🔥6❤4❤‍🔥4👍2

30 Oct 2026, 15:13 UTC≈1,230 views23 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤14👍5🔥4

30 Oct 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,170 views36 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤20🔥10👏3👍2😱1

30 Oct 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,120 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

FAKE TURKA ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ Термохромная деколь служит индикатором нагрева чаши. ▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ Мы провели анализ всех калаудов в рамках кальянной индустрии: YouTube: «Какой калауд выбрать?» На основании полученных данных мы оптимизировали конструкцию чаши TURKA, обеспечив оптимальную форму, необходимую толщину стенок и требуемую теплоемкость. Кроме того, собранная информация о калаудах позволила точно …

🔥11❤3👍2👏1

30 Oct 2026, 14:59 UTC≈2,550 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

3х25 или ⚡️

🤣19❤3👍2🔥2🌚1

30 Oct 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,490 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🇷🇺 🤝🏻 🇰🇿

❤13😁9🔥5💯2🤝2🆒1

27 Oct 2026, 13:42 UTC≈3,500 views21 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Немного слов о курительных характеристиках 💨 ▪️▪️▪️▪️▫️▫️▫️▫️

❤9🔥8👍2❤‍🔥1👏1

27 Oct 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,090 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

FAKE TURK - ТЕРМОХРОМНЫЙ ИНДИКАТОР Индикатор прогрева теперь с двух сторон, что позволяет комфортнее контролировать прогрев. - НОВАЯ ФОРМА В МАТОВОМ ИСПОЛНЕНИИ Стильный дизайн отлично сочетается с приятными тактильными ощущениями при использовании. - УМЕРЕННЫЙ РАСХОД 18-20 г Чашка обладает отличной вкусопередачей, имеет плавный прогрев, что позволит вам избежать перегревов. ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ Чаша для тех, кто…

🔥10❤8👍4

26 Oct 2026, 12:42 UTC≈1,320 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣10🔥8❤2❤‍🔥1👍1

26 Oct 2026, 12:41 UTC≈1,150 views21 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

FAKE TURK Вашему внимаю представляем новую форму чаши Fake ТУРКА - Удобный индикатор прогрева - Новая форма - Умеренный расход Стиль, практичность и удобство в одном флаконе🖤 Уже в продаже Hookah Time Shop

❤11👍5🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @Aik_Hookah_Time. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AIK_HT” (@Aik_Hookah_Time), 8,069 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aik_Hookah_Time.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.