Hello! We are Promoting The Best Platforms and Crypto Currency Project's Airdrop/BSC/ETH/DeFI/NFT Etcetera.
🔥Best Regards #DYOR
💠Marketing(CEO)- @V_1ersace
Created
Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 19 February 2026 to 26 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @AirdropUnfiltered. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
58 measurements spanning 89 days, net -13,103. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83,578–100,611 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 07:04
85,543
-169
3 Nov 2026, 04:00
85,712
-85
2 Nov 2026, 04:58
85,797
-138
1 Nov 2026, 08:04
85,935
-185
31 Oct 2026, 10:17
86,120
-266
30 Oct 2026, 11:55
86,386
-124
29 Oct 2026, 11:28
86,510
-160
28 Oct 2026, 13:55
86,670
-246
27 Oct 2026, 11:26
86,916
-109
26 Oct 2026, 13:05
87,025
+978
25 Oct 2026, 15:35
86,047
+113
24 Oct 2026, 18:39
85,934
-219
23 Oct 2026, 21:54
86,153
-86
22 Oct 2026, 22:29
86,239
-215
21 Oct 2026, 21:19
86,454
-201
20 Oct 2026, 16:41
86,655
-185
19 Oct 2026, 17:36
86,840
-155
18 Oct 2026, 16:17
86,995
-184
17 Oct 2026, 16:46
87,179
-181
16 Oct 2026, 13:39
87,360
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.69%
avg views ÷ 85,543 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,160
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held
39 (19 February 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total
9,476
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 18:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
123
Videos
2
Links
118
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
0s
Average length
0s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
2.56%
1 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
10,400
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
8,280
over 38 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 31 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👮♂️ $USDT Airdrop
🏆 Reward: 0.02$ USDT for Every Successful Refer
🟠 Airdrop Page: http://t.me/AirliteV3_bot
🔹 Follow their Twitter Page - x.com/Earningdoublex , retweet post.
🔹 Do the other tasks on the airdrop page for extra rewards.
🔹 Submit your details to the airdrop bot.
📃 Note: Never pay any amount for Airdrops or presales; all our airdrops are absolutely free to participate in!
🏆 Channel of AI signals 🔥 FREE
Signals for profitable trading
We trust our AI signals so much that we give $100–$50,000 to anyone willing to trade with them.
Profit split 50/50!
Subscribe to the channel to receive signals
📌We are pleased to announce the deployment of three new features 🔥
1. Honey Codes: A unique code redeemable within the Task section.
2. Exclusive Tasks: Users may now submit their own tasks to the bot to generate traffic.
3. Daily Check-in: This feature has been relocated to the Task tab to enhance accessibility.
🔔Additionally, the new Honey Code is as follows:
NEWUPDATE
- Referral rewards: Up to 250 Honey (0.25…
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @AirdropAlbert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AirdropAlbert edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 September 2026
Most recent edit
26 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @AirdropAlbert as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
30 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
32 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Airdrop Titans @Airdrop_Titans · 81,947 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 August 2026
Airdrops 360 @Airdrops_360 · 75,148 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 August 2026
BSC Samurai @BscSamurai · 167,639 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 August 2026
The Coin Cave @Coin_Cave · 49,049 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
Panther Airdrops @PantherAirdrops · 55,756 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
Deep Dive Crypto: Insights & Market Pulse @AirdropNexia · 62,035 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
Airdrop Segment @AirdropSegment · 67,355 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 19 August 2026
Airdrop Furious @FuriousAirdrop · 48,642 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 25 August 2026
Airdrop Overlay @AirdropOverlay · 69,256 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 19 August 2026
Airdrop Glance @AirdropGlance · 126,284 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026
Airdrop Lite @airdrops_lite · 55,228 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 22 August 2026
METRO REPORT 🗞 @metroreporten · 57,842 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto Supply @supplycrypto1 · 42,481 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 2 September 2026
Cipher Crypto Trader @CipherCryptoTrader · 120,439 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 21 August 2026
Airdrop Broadcaster @AirdropBroadcasterCom · 46,987 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Dyno Official 🚀🚀 @earndyno · 51,176 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 23 August 2026
CminerBox👑 @cminerboxs · 83,850 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 17 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Airdrop Albert” (@AirdropAlbert), 85,543 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AirdropAlbert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
