Have Telegram Stars or Gifts you won't use? Star Ledger buys them and pays you in TON. ⭐ Stars: credited instantly, from 1 Star 🎁 Gifts: see your offer before you send 💸 Withdraw to any TON wallet See how it works: https://youtu.be/3kFxxk9WPkE Try it: @StarLedgerBot

Channel
Airdrop Growth
@AirdropGrowth
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
63,455subscribers
-11,292 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001648269486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AirdropGrowth |
| Description | Airdrop Growth - Unlock Your Crypto Potential ----- YouTube: youtube.com/@airdropgrowth Community: t.me/airdropgrowthgroup Buy Ads: telega.io/c/AirdropGrowth ----- 🗨 Inquiries: @AirdropArbiter |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AirdropGrowth |
Topic
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 63,455 | -96 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:14 | 63,551 | -97 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:41 | 63,648 | -118 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:40 | 63,766 | -129 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 63,895 | -136 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 64,031 | -131 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:49 | 64,162 | -116 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 64,278 | -118 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:07 | 64,396 | -140 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:58 | 64,536 | +566 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:58 | 63,970 | -58 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 64,028 | -119 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:54 | 64,147 | -195 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:41 | 64,342 | -178 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:26 | 64,520 | -221 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 64,741 | -62 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:06 | 64,803 | -178 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:17 | 64,981 | -151 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:38 | 65,132 | -142 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 65,274 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 29 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.282%
- avg views ÷ 63,455 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 179
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (29 October 2025 – 1 November 2026) |
| Views total | 358 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 20:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 86
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 78
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Stop typing what you can hear. @TranscriberAppBot turns voice messages, audio and video into clean text. Instantly. Send a file. Get the transcript as a message and a .txt file. Try it free: https://t.me/TranscriberAppBot
🎨 StarNinja has a new look We rebuilt starninja.shop from the ground up. Same low prices, a much cleaner way to buy. ➡️ Stars or Premium in one simple card ➡️ See your total and how much you save before you pay ➡️ Pay with Gram, USDT, USDC, ETH, BNB and more, on 8 networks ➡️ Delivered in about a minute. No KYC, no account Take a look 👉 starninja.shop
💸 Your bio can earn you money Put your referral line in your bio and get $0.025 right away, then 20% of every sale from anyone who taps it. Open the bot, tap Earn $0.025, copy the two snippets, verify. One minute.
🚨 Scammed on Telegram? If someone scammed you and you have proof, report them: @IsScamRobot Send the chat screenshots and the payment receipt. A real person checks every report. If it holds up, the scammer gets published on miniapps.me/scam-watch with every channel, group, and bot they run, and everyone gets warned in @IsScamAlerts. Your name stays private. Nobody gets listed from rumors, only from proof.
PARRY is live. One tap. A ring closes in on every attack and you hit it at the right moment. Gold is worth triple. One hit and the run is over. Takes ten seconds to learn. You will not be good at it today. @playparrybot
🚫 Before you buy cheap Telegram Stars, read this Stars bought through the App Store or Google Play can be refunded by the store long after they have been spent. Apple allows up to 90 days. Some sellers rely on that. They buy Stars, sell them at a heavy discount, then request a refund on the original purchase. The store gives their money back and Telegram removes the Stars from whoever is holding them. Telegram's te…
📢 Advertising in this channel You can place an ad via Telega․io. It takes just a few minutes. Formats and current rates: View details
✈️ Telegram Stars can be converted to TON instantly. A step-by-step demonstration has been published, covering the full workflow: rates, volume bonuses, execution, and withdrawal. Zero fees. No manual processing. Check out the video now
🤩 Earn real Telegram Stars just by joining channels and starting bots. 🔹 Complete tasks → earn Stars 🔹 Refer friends → earn more 🔹 Withdraw directly to your Telegram 👉 @StarNinjaEarnBot
💥 The earlier you join BOOM, the more you earn. Mining pays $60–$150 per session. Referrals pay $15 each. It's free. @BoomFreeAirdropBot
🔥 20% bonus ends soon Every deposit to @StarNinjaEarnBot right now comes with a free 20% on top. If you were thinking about running a campaign — now is the time. 👉 @StarNinjaEarnBot
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @AirdropGrowth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@thebtchub · 3,497#1
@AirdropStudioOfficials · 4,680#2
@bitcoincapsule · 10,025#3
@BiteaseTracker · 481#4
@BanglaBlockade · 842#5
@zwe2010 · 521#6
@realtime_hacker · 13,102#7
@LegitAirdrops010 · 49,179#8
@AirdropOfficialSatellite · 26,029#9
@mkincometips · 129#10
@duniyar_mayajal · 1,869 (as read 20 August 2026)#11
@currentspread · 31,114#12
@cryptoalpha1122 · 23,708#13
@myothu8834 · 508#14
@Shwenu3 · 10,606#15
@Cryptoupdatemain1 · 17,832#16
@AirdropKartOfficial · 428,670#17
@Crypto_Newss_360 · 6,279 (as read 20 August 2026)#18
@tamilmarketing01 · 2,392#19
@pannmyo · 671#20
@DevChrisFoundation · 8,102#21
@AirdropFindTeam · 2,174,143#22
@DigibyteAirdropM · 88,128#23
@pyayminnthameefree7 · 661#24
@cryptonewsupdates1234 · 6,160#25
@rapswapstart · 418#26
@TigerInsightCommunity · 117,279#27
@cryptoN7725 · 10,363#28
@airdrop_Presents · 190,237#29
@tronxomine · 46,770#30
@CollectCoinUSDTChan · 588#31
@cryptoviproyalx · 10,107#32
@AirdropOfficialNFT · 3,094#33
@RvcClub · 2,050#34
@airdropstrikers · 17,831#35
@maldoriniofficialchannel · 20,483#36
@dogecoin_automatic · 8,666#37
@pinnaclenewsletters · 311#38
@edgeinvestco · 2,249#39
@TronVPN · 3,100#40
@incrypted_future · 8,548#41
@airdropinspector · 658,647#42
@PEPE_NEWS_AIRDROP · 2,167#43
@Crypto32108 · 9,759#44
@Airdrop · 1,254,364#45
@cryptoinv7725 · 5,350#46
@walpaper_games · 2,411#47
@AirdropLayer · 458,043#48
@cryptodaily_ann · 40,842#49
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AirdropOfficialSatellite · 26,029
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 12 September 2026
@currentspread · 31,114
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 4 September 2026
@AirdropNews_TM · 101,105
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 20 August 2026
@cryptoalpha1122 · 23,708
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 6 September 2026
@maldoriniofficialchannel · 20,483
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Airdrop Growth” (@AirdropGrowth), 63,455 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AirdropGrowth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.