vAPI new task social Link: http://api.vapinetwork.ai/earn - Completed new task social - Daily login - Done

Channel
AIRDROP BOSS
@AirdropbossX
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,532subscribers
-1,646 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001192500622 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AirdropbossX |
| Description | 🛫 All about cryptos & Airdrop ❗Need Telegram bot, gleam for airdrop? Contact admin: @growchan |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AirdropbossX |
Topic
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 01:19 | 17,532 | -8 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:58 | 17,540 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:05 | 17,543 | -12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:25 | 17,555 | -325 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:26 | 17,880 | -286 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:16 | 18,166 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:31 | 18,170 | -10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 18,180 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 18,188 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 18,197 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:47 | 18,202 | -11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 18,213 | -17 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:29 | 18,230 | -19 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:40 | 18,249 | -34 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:20 | 18,283 | -27 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 18,310 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 18,324 | -81 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 18,405 | -14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:48 | 18,419 | -13 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:35 | 18,432 | first reading |
Engagement
229 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.80%
- avg views ÷ 17,532 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 316
- 37 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.524%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 37
- of 229 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 229 (2 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 11,694 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 04:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,820
- Videos
- ≈157
- Links
- ≈25,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 58s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
43 reactions across 34 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 48.8% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 23.3% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 9.30% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 4.65% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 229 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 229 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (18.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Stabilizer Epoch 6 Has Started! A new epoch is here Claim your Epoch 5 NFT HERE
Bullshot raise 1M again Join HERE
Make sure you submitted your best 5 content before Campaign end
@moriusa_STPR Soneium Edition WL closes tomorrow. 5 spots. 1 day left. Here’s how to stack your tickets: 🎟️ Hold $50+ on Soneium in your mint wallet → 2 tickets 🎟️ Hold $50+ USDSC in your @StartaleApp Smart Account → 5 tickets 🎟️ Have both? → 7 tickets 💳 Bonus: Bonus: 50 community members will get priority access to the Startale Card. 🏆 5 winners drawn at random 🗓️ Winners announced Nov 8 Don’t miss it. Enter he…
Statale point distri
Join two waitlist 1. HERE 2. HERE
Gud mornin
vAPI Network Point Program Earn points for the 1M vAPI airdrop reward pool ( estimasi $55k ) Link: http://api.vapinetwork.ai/earn - Connect EVM wallet ( new wallet ) - Bind account social - Complete all task - Task onchain optional - Daily check-in - Done
Titan Poin Week 5 sudah didistribusikan Cek poin kalian : https://testnet.titanx.cc/
Claim OFC Vesting token https://fanpass.onefootball.com/claim-details
🚀 Xstocks Points 🎁 Points program 🔘 Sol & ETH network ------------------------------------------------- 🔻Airdrop link here 🔹choose on Sol or eth 🔹buy stock, lend on kamino or morpho.. borrow token 🔹️buy YT pendle but high risk 🔹️use reff to get 20% bonus I think this is new meta, crypto x Stocks.. everything on tokenization now.. try it bro..
Showing the 12 most recent of 229 posts we hold for @AirdropbossX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@AirdropbossX edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 28 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@AirdropbossX named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 24 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@freecoins24 · 28,415
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
@airdropblogspot · 171,783
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
@AirdropStar · 334,126
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@AirdropKing_News · 118,924
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@AirdropKartOfficial · 418,384
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
@LegitAirdrops010 · 49,090
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
@AirdropsGun · 19,219
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@AjoobzNews · 44,988
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
@AirdropO · 331,511
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@hemi_news · 31,721
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
@freeairdrop · 24,699
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
@Airdropce · 27,212
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
@cryptodaily_ann · 40,166
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 28 August 2026
@CryptoLibrarysAirdrop · 99,504
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AIRDROP BOSS” (@AirdropbossX), 17,532 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AirdropbossX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.