Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aktien mit Kopf

Channel

Aktien mit Kopf

@Aktienmit_Kopf1

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

47,864subscribers

-1,785 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003940320681
TypeChannel
Username@Aktienmit_Kopf1
Descriptionhttps://youtube.com/@AktienMitKopf Aktien mit Kopf Offizieller Kanal für YouTube-Videos Krypto-Streams, Kontoverwaltung und Investmentprogramme.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Aktienmit_Kopf1

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

6.7 average views per post against 47,864 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.014%. Across the 24,202 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,996 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.60% and 15.0%, with a median of 6.80%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (30 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Posts measured410 of 410 published in the window (410 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,735
Mature posts only0.015% over 97 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers47,864 measured 25 September 2026
Cohortb31623 · 24,202 channels · p10 0.813% · p25 2.60% · p50 6.80% · p75 15.0% · p90 27.5%
Position in cohort0.207th percentile · 1/500 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.06% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageGerman · 98.8% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 29 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

47,86449,64948,756.57 August 2026 — 49,649 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,649 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,644 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,613 subscribers9 August 2026 — 49,593 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49,543 subscribers11 August 2026 — 49,515 subscribers12 August 2026 — 49,473 subscribers13 August 2026 — 49,426 subscribers14 August 2026 — 49,409 subscribers16 August 2026 — 49,335 subscribers17 August 2026 — 49,257 subscribers18 August 2026 — 49,224 subscribers19 August 2026 — 49,181 subscribers20 August 2026 — 49,145 subscribers21 August 2026 — 49,105 subscribers22 August 2026 — 49,022 subscribers24 August 2026 — 48,960 subscribers25 August 2026 — 48,917 subscribers26 August 2026 — 48,863 subscribers27 August 2026 — 48,842 subscribers28 August 2026 — 48,832 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,791 subscribers30 August 2026 — 48,784 subscribers31 August 2026 — 48,770 subscribers1 September 2026 — 48,762 subscribers2 September 2026 — 48,756 subscribers3 September 2026 — 48,727 subscribers5 September 2026 — 48,688 subscribers9 September 2026 — 47,987 subscribers11 September 2026 — 47,957 subscribers13 September 2026 — 47,931 subscribers14 September 2026 — 47,925 subscribers16 September 2026 — 47,918 subscribers19 September 2026 — 47,897 subscribers25 September 2026 — 47,864 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 49 days, net -1,785. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,596–49,917 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 09:2147,864-33
19 Sept 2026, 02:0247,897-21
16 Sept 2026, 16:1647,918-7
14 Sept 2026, 21:5847,925-6
13 Sept 2026, 10:1547,931-26
11 Sept 2026, 15:3947,957-30
9 Sept 2026, 02:5747,987-701
5 Sept 2026, 17:2048,688-39
3 Sept 2026, 18:1948,727-29
2 Sept 2026, 11:1148,756-6
1 Sept 2026, 10:2948,762-8
31 Aug 2026, 11:4648,770-14
30 Aug 2026, 13:4448,784-7
29 Aug 2026, 11:5448,791-41
28 Aug 2026, 13:0748,832-10
27 Aug 2026, 12:5748,842-21
26 Aug 2026, 16:0348,863-54
25 Aug 2026, 15:2748,917-43
24 Aug 2026, 14:0448,960-62
22 Aug 2026, 19:4349,022first reading

Engagement

859 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.014%
avg views ÷ 47,864 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.7
400 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
400
of 859 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 400 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held859 (7 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total2,678
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 11:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,110
Videos
≈393
Links
≈1,180

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9h 32m
Average length
7m 15s

Measured directly from 79 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 859 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 859 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC2 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Gold-Beben bei 5 % Zinsen: Doch China kauft wie nie zuvor! 🚨 Gold-Beben oder Kaufchance? 🥇 Während der Goldpreis wegen 5%-Zinsen & starkem Dollar auf 4.244 $ abrutschte, kauft China wie nie zuvor – über 1.000 Tonnen allein bis August! 📈🇨🇳 Gleichzeitig kürzen Minen wie Shandong Gold & Kinross ihre Förderziele, Kosten explodieren und Staaten greifen zu (Burkina Faso, Russland 👀). 🔍 @Aktien_kolja1💰

29 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC2 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🔥 Fördermilliarden treiben Preise: Das deutsche Wärmepumpen-„Subventionsparadox“ Trotz hoher staatlicher Zuschüsse sind Wärmepumpen in Deutschland deutlich teurer als in anderen Ländern. Die Verbraucherzentrale Rheinland-Pfalz wertete 160 reale Angebote aus. Das günstigste lag bei 21.099 Euro, das teuerste bei 54.168 Euro. Der Durchschnitt: rund 36.400 Euro. Eine Analyse von Marek Miara und Jan Rosenow kommt zu äh…

29 Sept 2026, 10:57 UTC2 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

2.82 BTC erhalten 🟢 (208,921.35 €) „Das ist die beste Investition meines Lebens … alles lief reibungslos.“ Von Zweifeln zu Zuversicht zu Ergebnissen. Echte Gewinne. Echte Auszahlungen. Wenn Struktur auf Kontinuität trifft, stellen sich die Ergebnisse ein. Bist du bereit, deine eigene Reise zu beginnen? 📩 Telegram: @Aktien_kolja1 ✅️

29 Sept 2026, 10:24 UTC4 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Deutschland ist im Niedergang! Im Sport wie in der Politik, gesellschaftlich und in der Wirtschaft. Go woke - go broke! Ideologie über Vernunft und dazu Hybris und spätrömische Dekadenz haben zu historischen Fehlentscheidungen geführt. Wir brauchen Demut, Lust, Leistung & Mut Was denkt ihr?

29 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC4 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

🎯 Dienstag, 29. 🎯 September Die neue Woche ist da und wir sind immer noch im Grünen Markt. 📊 Werde jetzt nicht zu aufgeregt, spiel einfach weiter dasselbe Spiel, das funktioniert. Stetige, kleine Siege schlagen jeden glücklichen Schlag. 1 % besser jeden Tag. 🏆 https://t.me/Aktien_kolja1

29 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC4 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Franklin Templeton bringt tokenisierte Sicherheiten zu Bybit Der Vermögensverwalter Franklin Templeton und die Kryptobörse Bybit haben eine strategische Zusammenarbeit vereinbart. Institutionelle Kunden können künftig tokenisierte Anteile an Geldmarktfonds als Sicherheit hinterlegen und dafür Handelskredite in USDT oder USDC erhalten. Die Fondsanteile laufen über Franklins Benji-Plattform und bleiben außerhalb der …

29 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC4 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

INSA-Umfrage: „Union fällt auf 19 Prozent – zehn Punkte hinter der AfD!" 🟠 Der neue Sonntagstrend für die Bild am Sonntag zeigt die Kanzlerpartei auf ihrem schwächsten Stand dieser Legislaturperiode. Die Eckdaten: • Union: 19% (−1) – Tiefstwert seit der Bundestagswahl • AfD: Unverändert 29% – der Abstand wächst auf zehn Punkte • Weitere: Grüne 15%, SPD 14%, Linke 10%, FDP 4% 📌 Bei der Wahl im Februar 2025 lag die …

29 Sept 2026, 10:21 UTC4 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

Strategy: „1.665 Bitcoin gekauft – alle Verkäufe des Jahres zurückgeholt!" 🟠 Mit dem jüngsten Kauf übertrifft Saylors Firma ihren bisherigen Rekordbestand aus dem Juni. Die Eckdaten: • Zukauf: 1.665 BTC für 142,7 Mio. $ – Schnitt 85.681 $ je Coin • Bestand: 847.666 BTC – neuer Höchststand, Einstand bei 75.437 $ • Ranking: Platz 1 weltweit – über 4% des gesamten Bitcoin-Angebots 📌 Finanziert wurde der Kauf diesmal …

29 Sept 2026, 10:21 UTC4 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Capital B kauft 13 Bitcoin, Bestand steigt auf 3.538 BTC Die Pariser Bitcoin-Treasury-Firma Capital B hat 13 Bitcoin für 0,97 Mio. Euro gekauft, zu einem Durchschnittspreis von 74.364 Euro. Der Gesamtbestand steigt damit auf 3.538 BTC. Finanziert wurde der Kauf über eine Kapitalerhöhung beim Vermögensverwalter TOBAM zu 5,68 Euro je Aktie. Seit Jahresbeginn erzielte das Unternehmen eine „BTC Yield" von 2,20 Prozent.…

29 Sept 2026, 10:21 UTC4 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

USA & China: „Kein einziger chinesischer Konzernchef beim Staatsdinner im Weißen Haus!" 🟠 Während US-Techgrößen den Saal füllten, schickte Peking fast nur Regierungsvertreter – ein Zeichen anhaltender Spannungen. Was geschehen ist: • Gäste: Unter über 130 Teilnehmern kamen weniger als 20 aus China – kein einziger CEO • Kontrast: Im Mai brachte Trump Musk und den damaligen Apple-Chef Cook nach Peking • Ergebnis: Der…

29 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC4 viewsread 29 September 2026
Video

Ric Edelman: „Ein bis zwei Prozent Bitcoin sind viel zu wenig!" 🟠 Der Gründer von Edelman Financial Engines bekräftigt seine Forderung nach deutlich höheren Krypto-Anteilen im Depot. Seine Einschätzung: • Aussage: 1 bis 2% Krypto seien „bei Weitem nicht ausreichend" • Modell: 10% für Vorsichtige, 25% für Ausgewogene, bis 40% für Risikofreudige • Begründung: Das klassische 60/40-Depot hält er für überholt 📌 Neu ist…

Showing the 12 most recent of 859 posts we hold for @Aktienmit_Kopf1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aktien mit Kopf” (@Aktienmit_Kopf1), 47,864 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aktienmit_Kopf1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.