Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for منبه الحوقلة

Channel

منبه الحوقلة

@AlHoQla

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

70,504subscribers

-237 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725603967
TypeChannel
Username@AlHoQla
Descriptionالحوقلة كنز من كنوز الجنة وفضلها عظيم ، "لاحول ولا قوة إلا بالله" .. لهذا اتت فكرة منبه الحوقلة لعل ان نتوفق بالفوز بذلك الكنز من خلال تذكيركم على مدار الساعة واليوم. بوت الحوقله : @AlHoQla_bot بإدارة قناة الفيصل @al_fi9l
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AlHoQla

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

70,50470,79570,649.56 August 2026 — 70,741 subscribers6 August 2026 — 70,741 subscribers7 August 2026 — 70,754 subscribers8 August 2026 — 70,753 subscribers9 August 2026 — 70,762 subscribers10 August 2026 — 70,766 subscribers11 August 2026 — 70,774 subscribers12 August 2026 — 70,769 subscribers13 August 2026 — 70,778 subscribers14 August 2026 — 70,776 subscribers15 August 2026 — 70,779 subscribers17 August 2026 — 70,786 subscribers18 August 2026 — 70,795 subscribers19 August 2026 — 70,757 subscribers20 August 2026 — 70,721 subscribers22 August 2026 — 70,685 subscribers23 August 2026 — 70,658 subscribers25 August 2026 — 70,593 subscribers26 August 2026 — 70,576 subscribers27 August 2026 — 70,558 subscribers28 August 2026 — 70,560 subscribers29 August 2026 — 70,558 subscribers30 August 2026 — 70,533 subscribers31 August 2026 — 70,536 subscribers1 September 2026 — 70,534 subscribers2 September 2026 — 70,504 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 27 days, net -237. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70,460–70,839 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 04:4470,504-30
1 Sept 2026, 02:2670,534-2
31 Aug 2026, 03:4470,536+3
30 Aug 2026, 01:0570,533-25
29 Aug 2026, 03:2570,558-2
28 Aug 2026, 00:1270,560+2
27 Aug 2026, 01:3770,558-18
26 Aug 2026, 02:4870,576-17
25 Aug 2026, 02:1870,593-65
23 Aug 2026, 15:3470,658-27
22 Aug 2026, 04:4970,685-36
20 Aug 2026, 19:1970,721-36
19 Aug 2026, 15:4770,757-38
18 Aug 2026, 13:4370,795+9
17 Aug 2026, 10:1470,786+7
15 Aug 2026, 18:1770,779+3
14 Aug 2026, 10:3870,776-2
13 Aug 2026, 04:1570,778+9
12 Aug 2026, 06:3270,769-5
11 Aug 2026, 04:4570,774first reading

Engagement

1,001 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.35%
avg views ÷ 70,504 subscribers
Avg views / post
955
1,001 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,001
of 1,001 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held1,001 (6 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total955,640
Reactions total146,249
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

146,053 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
125,18885.7%
👍20,86514.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146,053 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AlHoQla. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC195 views53 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

44👍9

2 Sept 2026, 14:30 UTC405 views76 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

68👍8

2 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC571 views91 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

80👍11

2 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC665 views108 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

97👍11

2 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC795 views123 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

105👍18

2 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC903 views131 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

112👍19

2 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC953 views136 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

114👍22

2 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC≈1,050 views152 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

130👍22

2 Sept 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,100 views160 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

137👍23

2 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC≈1,160 views170 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

145👍25

2 Sept 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,230 views177 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

146👍31

2 Sept 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,270 views175 reactionsread 2 September 2026

«لا حَوْلَ ولا قوَّةَ إلَّا باللهِ»

149👍26

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,001 posts we hold for @AlHoQla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 32,604 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

مَهرب إلى الله.
@imahrab7 · 6,402
#1
منبه الباقيات الصالحات
@baqyat0 · 16,297
#2
مُنبه الصَّلاة على النبيِّ ﷺ
@MONH7 · 10,517
#3
منبه الصلاة على النبي ﷺ 🔖
@quran_v19 · 21,287
#4
مُنبِه الصلاة الإبراهيمية ‏ᥫ᭡
@YYGQ1 · 3,113
#5
مُنبِّه الْبَاقِيَاتُ الصَّالِحَات
@ALbaqiiyat · 5,179
#6
قافلة المتصدقين
@ydalon · 14,986
#7
قناة: غَيث مُزن.
@ghaith_mozn2 · 12,716
#8
قَسوَرَة | مُستَخفٍ باللَّيل
@qsawarah · 3,281
#9
مُنبِّه التَّحمِيد
@Altahmid · 4,291
#10
زاد الغيـث 📖🌧
@zad_alghaith · 8,669
#11
الملاذ الآمن
@maladh_amin · 15,393
#12
﴿ وَمَن يَتَوَكَّل عَلَى اللَّهِ فَهُوَ حَسبُهُ ﴾
@ll2007ii · 1,060
#13
𝑻𝒆𝒏𝒆𝒃𝒓𝒐𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒚
@Tenebrosity_27 · 173 (as read 20 August 2026)
#14
غيمة🫀
@R883M · 16,942
#15
𝑼𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒑𝒑𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝑨𝒎𝒃𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏🌱
@PositiveGirl1 · 3,511
#16
منبه ضمير
@damir_study · 33,018
#17
آيـٰة .
@quran2221 · 7,466
#18
هاي داي | WORLD
@WORLD1214 · 448
#19
يقين|Yaqeen
@llxi_8 · 2,492
#20
رَبيــعُ القلوب☁️.
@malfahad1 · 7,140
#21
مُسلم
@ImaanPath · 3,107
#22
ملاذ المُؤمِن
@ajjjjeri · 6,107
#23
هِمَم ( 𝗦𝘁𝘂𝗱𝘆 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗨𝘀 )
@study_with_us77 · 6,924
#24
مآل الرُّبى🌿
@mallalruba · 5,004
#25
منبه تاج الذكر
@TajAltheker · 20,873
#26
غراس فوريست 🌱
@foreeestrr · 5,647
#27
إِدْلهَامٌ | عالمِي الخاص.
@be2_doo · 64 (as read 20 August 2026)
#28
𝜗𝜚
@I9d8a · 448
#29
صدقة جارية لنورة سعود رحمها الله
@norasauod · 1,070
#30
غَيث
@Gaithi · 8,532
#31
تَراتِيـل الآي
@taratilalay · 4,356 (as read 20 August 2026)
#32
ً
@All_966 · 1,050
#33
المَرفِق🌥️
@Marffeq · 3,410
#34
Study with MVX 🧠
@study_with_mvx · 552
#35
مواضيع عبير 🫀.
@iis10_i · 84,662
#36
شهوات مميتة
@lyth999 · 5,661
#37
اذكرو الله في انفسكم 🌿
@mtl788 · 5,660
#38
قناة بوت أذكاري 🕊
@Athkari45 · 20,269
#39
تعليمات 🌳 غَابَة جَبَل ⛰️
@Jabal_Forest_Channel · 6,799
#40
نَـبـض القّـدرَات
@nbdvrs · 1,212
#41
سخاء
@sakhaa2 · 7,499
#42
غِرَاسْ ☁️.
@malfah · 11,739
#43
الشَهد
@shed9 · 5,441
#44
رَواء
@rawae00 · 10,555
#45
محطة عبور
@euburteam · 1,384
#46
KFUPM Files
@KFUPM_Files · 14,660
#47
حرفٌ مزدان
@iAbeerAlf · 6,445
#48
وَذَكِّرْ فَإِنَّ الذِّكْرَى تَنْفَعُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ
@iiqlllll · 844
#49
لا أبرح حتى أبلغ / تعافي
@ta3fi_channel · 14,494
#50
Owls of the forest 🦉🌳
@Fooorests · 938
#51
طُوبَى
@qka_7 · 9,914
#52
مُنَّبِه دَعْوَةُ ذِي النُّونِ
@Muslim_Duaa · 7,852
#53
مُنبه الصلاة الإبراهيمية ﷺ
@r94hr · 26,410
#54
-رقّ منشُور -
@saleh0khaled · 6,568
#55
للجنـة🌱.
@ieili3 · 4,080
#56
منبه تاج التحصين
@altahsin · 6,946
#57
ريـكّـسـونا ✨
@Elhazem_pa · 1,970
#58
منارة | manarah
@qadrat_a · 90,273
#59
مَلجأك
@iwllt · 2,053
#60
مُستنهَض الهِمم
@atharalj · 11,635
#61
𝙁𝙖𝙝𝙖𝙙🦦
@FD_AZD · 633
#62
تخطوا حدودكم، هنا والآن🍀
@ForestAnimeBlackClover · 1,309
#63
𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟 📚☕️
@learn_EWP27 · 1,230 (as read 20 August 2026)
#64
Challenge yourself 🫶🏻
@Challengeforest · 7,862
#65
وكالة تعليق الدراسة
@news_ejaza · 358,012
#66
No Pain No Gain
@foresssstr · 1,693
#67
My Universe🍭
@UniverseByHala · 2,162
#68
إنعاش الضمير Forest 🪻
@spidermed23 · 1,083
#69
تجمع لاعبين أقوى لعبه بالكون 🇸🇦.
@HayDay53 · 4,867
#70
فورست الحرس🌱
@ForestKSAU · 2,415
#71
صَفاء الرُّوح
@safaalro7 · 24,131
#72
KSAU-HS | Batch 22
@KSAU22 · 2,947 (as read 20 August 2026)
#73
يلا نذاكر
@study_with_me9 · 1,730 (as read 20 August 2026)
#74
Rescue land
@RescueLand · 284
#75
منصة أينشتاين | تحصيلي
@hjjhhhjjnkkjhgg1234 · 387,945
#76
دبوســة
@ll0ii2 · 3,239
#77
Study Or Regret?
@llvc64 · 673
#78
الغابة البنفسجية🇸🇦🌂
@Forest_purple · 1,218
#79

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الفيصل (تقنية ، بوتات ، برمجة)
@al_fi9l · 183,146
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 21 August 2026
دليل مجموعات جَبَل ⛰
@Jabal_Groups · 111,067
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
إجازات السعودية
@eduksa1 · 46,477
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 August 2026
تسريبات مظلة - قدرات &
@ne_wb · 120,570
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
تسريبات ستيب STEP
@STEP_511 · 143,332
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
المعاصر قدرات وتحصيلي - عماد الجزيري
@vip_qustion · 318,949
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
قناة تجميعات ستيب STEP الحساني
@step_alhassani · 383,760
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
تسريبات سايفر 2026
@CypherDojo · 215,567
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
منارة | manarah
@qadrat_a · 90,273
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
قناة - تطوعية
@pnu440 · 40,292
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 30 August 2026
مواضيع عبير 🫀.
@iis10_i · 84,662
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
لطلبة UQ 🤍
@uqu66i · 40,861
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 August 2026
فَارُوقُ الأُمَّةِ 🔖
@FaroukAlUmma · 42,896
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
مُعين🔆|جامعي
@H2_GG · 67,438
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“منبه الحوقلة” (@AlHoQla), 70,504 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlHoQla.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.