Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑨𝑳𝑩𝑨𝑻𝑹𝑶𝑺𝑺 🕊

Channel

𝑨𝑳𝑩𝑨𝑻𝑹𝑶𝑺𝑺 🕊

@Albatrosss5071

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29,136subscribers

+2,118 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002552948544
TypeChannel
Username@Albatrosss5071
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Albatrosss5071

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@Albatrosss5071 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@muwwdi
held 7 August 20267 August 2026

Growth

18,85933,80326,3317 August 2026 — 27,018 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,945 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,910 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,874 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,758 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,681 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,939 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,566 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,389 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,071 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,916 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,766 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,738 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,663 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,559 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,463 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,395 subscribers26 August 2026 — 33,803 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,345 subscribers27 August 2026 — 33,533 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,302 subscribers28 August 2026 — 33,285 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,233 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,937 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,175 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,675 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,122 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,459 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,067 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,219 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,023 subscribers2 September 2026 — 31,799 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,950 subscribers3 September 2026 — 31,566 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,859 subscribers5 September 2026 — 31,203 subscribers9 September 2026 — 30,543 subscribers11 September 2026 — 30,191 subscribers13 September 2026 — 30,000 subscribers15 September 2026 — 29,714 subscribers17 September 2026 — 29,456 subscribers19 September 2026 — 29,136 subscribers29,1367 August 202619 September 2026
42 measurements spanning 43 days, net +2,118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,617–36,045 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 11:1529,136-320
17 Sept 2026, 01:4129,456-258
15 Sept 2026, 03:1629,714-286
13 Sept 2026, 08:5930,000-191
11 Sept 2026, 15:1730,191-352
9 Sept 2026, 03:2030,543-660
5 Sept 2026, 19:3931,203+12,344
5 Sept 2026, 10:1518,859-12,707
3 Sept 2026, 15:5631,566+12,616
3 Sept 2026, 10:2218,950-12,849
2 Sept 2026, 11:2531,799+12,776
2 Sept 2026, 03:2719,023-13,196
1 Sept 2026, 08:1332,219+13,152
1 Sept 2026, 01:4419,067-13,392
31 Aug 2026, 08:2432,459+13,337
30 Aug 2026, 21:4719,122-13,553
30 Aug 2026, 10:3932,675+13,500
29 Aug 2026, 21:3819,175-13,762
29 Aug 2026, 09:5332,937+13,704
28 Aug 2026, 20:3619,233first reading

Engagement

143 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.02%
avg views ÷ 29,136 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 143 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 59 of 80 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held143 (30 July 202619 September 2026)
Views total93,667
Reactions total822
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Sept 2026, 07:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
174
Videos
17
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 35s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,604 reactions across 112 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔1,13831.6%
83923.3%
😭41111.4%
🤝39310.9%
🌚2165.99%
🍓1815.02%
💅1784.94%
❤‍🔥1423.94%
💋962.66%
🦄100.277%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 112 of the 143 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,604 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 143 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 143 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Albatrosss5071. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 143 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2026, 02:03 UTC522 viewsread 20 September 2026

وقتی تو جمع یکی ازت تعریف میکنه حواست به اونی باشه که بحث رو عوض میکنه…

18 Sept 2026, 22:04 UTC588 viewsread 20 September 2026

طبیعت انسان، کشتن و ریختن خون است. در طول سه هزار سال از تاریخ بشر، کمتر از دویست سال صلح بین انسان‌ها وجود داشت! پس باید بپذیریم که متاسفانه این وضعیت طبیعی بشر است. ما در یک چرخه تمدنی هستیم که هر هشتاد سال یک بار، یک سیستم اقتصادی تغییر می‌کند و هر دویست و پنجاه سال، یک امپراتوری فرو می‌پاشد. بنابراین، آمریکا اکنون به دویست و پنجاه سالگی خود رسیده و به عنوان یک امپراتوری، عمر خود را به پایان رسانده است. همچنین،

18 Sept 2026, 21:58 UTC508 viewsread 20 September 2026

و اما سناریو سوم و بهترین سناریو ممکن برای خلیج فارس بهترین سناریوی ممکن در حال حاضر برای خلیج فارس، توافقی آشکار با ایران است. امیدوارم که رهبران احمق و خود فروخته خلیج فارس به این سناریو روی بیاورند، زیرا سناریوهای دیگر بسیار نگران‌کننده هستند. معتقدم این توافق باید بر اساس مشارکت اقتصادی و حفظ منافع باشد، همچنین، کشورک های خلیج فارس باید سبد متحدانشان را متنوع کنند. آنها آمریکایی‌ها را امتحان کردند، و اکنون،

18 Sept 2026, 21:51 UTC419 viewsread 20 September 2026

ما ۳ سناریو برای تحولات خلیج فارس داریم ۱. اگر ایران به پیروزی نظامی کامل دست یابد، آمریکا را از خلیج فارس اخراج کند و دست خود را از خلیج فارس بردارد، کشورک های خلیج فارس به طور کامل تحت نفوذ ایران قرار خواهند گرفت. این موضوع منجر به تغییرات اساسی، به ویژه در بحرین و کویت، خواهد شد. قدرت دولت دُزد امارات به شدت کاهش خواهد یافت و یک کودتا در داخل خانواده سلطنتی سعودی رخ خواهد داد. ۲. اگر آمریکا در نهایت در جنگ با

18 Sept 2026, 21:06 UTC484 viewsread 20 September 2026

همه چیز اکنون به روز سه‌شنبه بستگی دارد. من بر این باورم که ما به سمت تشدید در روند درگیریها پیش خواهیم رفت. ترامپ می‌خواهد از جبهه خلیج فارس خود اطمینان حاصل کند، و این تقسیم‌بندی شامل کویت، بحرین و امارات خواهد بود. یعنی این سه کشور موافقت خواهند کرد، در حالی که عمان و قطر به هر قیمتی هم که باشد، مخالفت خواهند کرد. بنابراین، ما به سمت تشدید و یک تشدید بسیار بزرگ پیش می‌رویم. ما اکنون وارد موج سوم این جنگ هستیم

18 Sept 2026, 20:58 UTC547 viewsread 20 September 2026

اکنون، ما در دور سوم این جنگ هستیم. این دور توسط ملاقات ترامپ با رهبران جعلی و خود فروخته کشورکهای خلیج فارس در روز سه‌شنبه تعیین خواهد شد. ترامپ با آنها ملاقات خواهد کرد و در مورد اینکه این جنگ به کجا خواهد رفت، با آنها گفتگو خواهد کرد. و باید این را خدمتتان عرض کنم که کشورکهای خلیج فارس در هر دو حالت بازنده خواهند بود.یعنی این کشورک ها چه ایران پیروز شود، و چه آمریکا پیروز شود، بازنده خواهند بود. اما با توجه

18 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC555 viewsread 20 September 2026

اگر بندر ینبع به دلیل حملات یمنی بسته شود، این به معنای اوج استراتژیک ایران از یک طرح ایرانی است که هدف باید تنها حفظ شتاب رویدادها باشد در آن زمان جهان وارد رکود تورمی خواهد شد و این مانند انفجار یک بمب هسته‌ای بر اقتصاد جهانی است... # جنگ بدون مرز

18 Sept 2026, 20:31 UTC560 viewsread 20 September 2026

بندر ینبع قطب نفت سعودی مجدد مورد هدف قرار گرفت

18 Sept 2026, 20:30 UTC584 viewsread 20 September 2026

این بزرگ‌ترین حمله موشکی یمن در جنگ فعلی است

Showing the 12 most recent of 143 posts we hold for @Albatrosss5071. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑨𝑳𝑩𝑨𝑻𝑹𝑶𝑺𝑺 🕊” (@Albatrosss5071), 29,136 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Albatrosss5071.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.