Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alerte Monde

Channel

Alerte Monde

@Alerte_monde

Not marked by Telegram, checked 20 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,461subscribers

+262 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002223229664
TypeChannel
Username@Alerte_monde
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Alerte_monde

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,19912,46112,3307 August 2026 — 12,199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,199 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,208 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,240 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,260 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,270 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,272 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,269 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,264 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,304 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,312 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,302 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,309 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,304 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,330 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,341 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,331 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,335 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,343 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,336 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,348 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,361 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,376 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,371 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,362 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,365 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,385 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,398 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,408 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,431 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,438 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,443 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,461 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +262. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,160–12,500 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:1812,461+18
16 Sept 2026, 22:1812,443+5
14 Sept 2026, 21:3812,438+7
13 Sept 2026, 08:3912,431+23
11 Sept 2026, 12:1712,408+10
8 Sept 2026, 18:0112,398+13
5 Sept 2026, 14:0112,385+20
3 Sept 2026, 13:1912,365+3
2 Sept 2026, 06:0312,362-9
1 Sept 2026, 06:3612,371-5
31 Aug 2026, 04:1412,376+15
30 Aug 2026, 01:3812,361+13
29 Aug 2026, 05:0312,348+12
28 Aug 2026, 08:2512,336-7
27 Aug 2026, 09:2612,343+8
26 Aug 2026, 07:0412,335+4
25 Aug 2026, 10:2712,331-10
24 Aug 2026, 07:1512,341+11
22 Aug 2026, 18:3612,330+26
21 Aug 2026, 09:0312,304first reading

Engagement

113 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.71%
avg views ÷ 12,461 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 113 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held113 (3 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total44,777
Reactions total524
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 10s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,441 reactions across 111 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
25817.9%
👍21314.8%
🤮1429.85%
🤣1127.77%
🤡855.90%
🤬785.41%
👏735.07%
🔥674.65%
🎉644.44%
💩614.23%
👎493.40%
😁392.71%
💯332.29%
🐳312.15%
🤔251.73%
🙏191.32%
😈140.972%
🏆130.902%
🥱120.833%
💊90.625%
15 further kinds443.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 112 of the 113 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,441 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:58 UTC256 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Quand le bon sens devient rare, retrouvez-le ici, en français. S’abonner au dossier

2 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC605 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇮🇱🇩🇪 — L'Allemagne a réussi à tester le missile balistique LORA, fabriqué en Israël, à partir d'une frégate de la marine allemande, dans l'océan Atlantique Nord. La marine allemande a déclaré que le test a été couronné de succès et qu'elle allait maintenant accélérer les plans d'acquisition du système LORA, qui a une portée de plus de 500 km. Le chef de la marine, le vice-amiral Jan Christian Kaack, a qualifié ce t

🤮8🥱2

2 Sept 2026, 12:04 UTC676 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇮🇷🔴🇺🇸— Un porte-parole du quartier général central Khatam al-Anbiya en Iran a averti que tout pays coopérant avec l'armée américaine dans des attaques contre l'Iran sera tenu responsable des conséquences de cette coopération. « Tout pays qui coopère avec l'armée américaine, dont les actions sont agressives, devra assumer les graves conséquences de cette coopération. » La direction militaire iranienne a à plusieurs

7👍6🥰2💯1🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 09:12 UTC761 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇮🇷❌🇺🇸🇯🇴🇰🇼 L'Iran a lancé une série de missiles et de drones à destination d'intérêts américains en Jordanie et au Koweït.

👍86👏2🎉1🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 08:34 UTC812 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🇮🇷❌🇺🇸 — Le président de l'Assemblée des représentants islamique d'Iran, Ghalibaf : École de Minab : des enfants massacrés. Salle de sport de Lamerd : des enfants assassinés. Mariage à Kouhestak : des enfants tués avec leurs familles. Si un pouvoir agit comme Satan, choisit ses cibles comme Satan, et tue comme Satan, alors c'est Satan. Protège-t-il un petit Satan qui fait de même ? Alors c'est LE Grand Satan.

👍7💯5🤝31👏1🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 23:27 UTC927 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇮🇷🇮🇷❌🇺🇸🏳Le commandant adjoint des Gardiens de la révolution envoie un message aux pays arabes : Il serait préférable pour vous d'expulser les Américains de vos pays et de récupérer vos bases militaires. Sinon, les forces armées iraniennes ont prouvé que si l'Iran était attaqué depuis n'importe quel point du Koweït, du Bahreïn, de la Jordanie ou de tout autre pays, cela entraînerait des réactions décisives et fermes.

16💯9

1 Sept 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,070 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Bessent exclut tout accord entre la Russie et les États-Unis avant un règlement en Ukraine

🤣7

1 Sept 2026, 10:14 UTC≈1,140 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇺🇸🔴🇮🇶 — Les États-Unis approuvent une possible vente d'hélicoptères d'une valeur de 800 millions de dollars à l'Irak

🤮131👍1

1 Sept 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,140 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇮🇷🇮🇷❌🇺🇸 — Les Gardiens de la révolution islamique (IRGC) annoncent qu'ils ont abattu un drone américain de type MQ-9 à l'est du détroit d'Ormuz.

14👍6🏆2

1 Sept 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,200 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇮🇷🇸🇦⚡️ — L'agence de presse IRIB rapporte que le pétrolier saoudien "Cedar", capable de transporter 2 millions de barils, a été intercepté alors qu'il traversait le corridor sud du détroit d'Ormuz.

🔥12🎉3🥰3👍1

31 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC≈1,290 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🇷🇺❌🇺🇦 Les attaques russes contre l'Ukraine, en particulier la capitale Kiev, se poursuivent, et de lourds dégâts sont signalés dans la capitale ukrainienne.

👍204🥰2🎉1

31 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,300 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🇺🇸🇻🇪 Les États-Unis ont publié de nouvelles photos du président vénézuélien Nicolás Maduro, qui est actuellement incarcéré aux États-Unis depuis son arrestation en janvier de cette année.

🤬202💔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 113 posts we hold for @Alerte_monde. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Info Source
@ibou_sy2 · 56,495
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
Maimouna Camara (La Guepe News)
@laguepequipique · 21,770
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 September 2026
Hergon prime
@hergonprime225 · 71,925
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 19 August 2026
Mali Emploi🇲🇱🇲🇱
@Mali_Emploi · 28,438
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 9 September 2026
Bouba Fané news
@boubafane · 23,314
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 September 2026
Stratégies Mondiales
@Strategiescontinentales · 35,681
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alerte Monde” (@Alerte_monde), 12,461 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alerte_monde.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.