International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 20 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @AlfredKochBayern. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net -159. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,773–6,980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 07:04
6,797
-6
2 Nov 2026, 10:19
6,803
-8
30 Oct 2026, 05:09
6,811
-5
27 Oct 2026, 12:47
6,816
-8
24 Oct 2026, 08:40
6,824
-5
21 Oct 2026, 06:38
6,829
-8
18 Oct 2026, 05:06
6,837
-13
14 Oct 2026, 18:26
6,850
-8
11 Oct 2026, 08:57
6,858
-11
5 Oct 2026, 02:54
6,869
-10
25 Sept 2026, 21:19
6,879
-8
15 Sept 2026, 16:40
6,887
+3
11 Sept 2026, 14:17
6,884
-5
7 Sept 2026, 04:17
6,889
-11
2 Sept 2026, 02:03
6,900
-8
27 Aug 2026, 09:25
6,908
+1
24 Aug 2026, 02:46
6,907
-10
20 Aug 2026, 10:54
6,917
-7
17 Aug 2026, 15:55
6,924
-15
14 Aug 2026, 12:28
6,939
first reading
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.5%
avg views ÷ 6,797 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,000
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 77 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
77 (27 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
52,120
Reactions total
2,827
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 00:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
55
Videos
41
Links
36
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
8,826 reactions across 77 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,335
49.1%
❤
3,035
34.4%
👏
345
3.91%
🔥
281
3.18%
💩
223
2.53%
🥰
152
1.72%
💯
100
1.13%
👎
57
0.646%
🥴
55
0.623%
🤡
42
0.476%
😢
40
0.453%
😁
32
0.363%
🤔
31
0.351%
🤮
26
0.295%
🙏
24
0.272%
🥱
9
0.102%
🖕
6
0.068%
🗿
6
0.068%
🤣
5
0.057%
😱
3
0.034%
9 further kinds
19
0.215%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,826 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Прошли четыре года и двести пятьдесят четыре дня войны. На фронте никаких серьезных изменений нет. ISW пишет, что ВСУ удачно контратаковали восточнее Славянска и немного продвинулись в районе Рай-Александровки и Пискуновки. В свою очередь россияне продвинулись на северо-востоке Харьковской области к северу и юго-востоку от Великого Бурлука. Больше никаких изменений линии фронта не фиксировалось.
В ночь на сегодня (4…
Что касается приглашения в Москву, то Зеленский назвал это «плевком в лицо» всем, кто хочет мира: «Мы не приглашаем Путина в Киев. Во-первых, они в 2022 году без приглашения пришли к нам. Во-вторых, нет смысла приглашать Путина в Киев, потому что они не приедут. Приглашать для того, чтобы они не приехали, – это деструктивно. Так же, как и приглашать меня в Москву – то, что делает Россия, – деструктивно. Это просто пл…
Что это? Наивность? Или что? Если Зеленский реально хочет встретится с Путиным для того, чтобы рассказать ему что он неправ и он - агрессор, то я думаю такая встреча ничем хорошим закончится не может. Это будет повторение скандала в Овальном кабинете, только с более тяжелыми последствиями для мирного процесса.
Ну вот где я критикую Зеленского? Я по-человечески, совершенно искренне ему симпатизирую. Он абсолютно прав…
Прошли четыре года и двести пятьдесят три дня войны. На фронте за сутки никаких изменений не произошло и линия фронта плюс-минус та же, что и вчера. Соответственно, комментировать - нечего.
В ночь на сегодня (3 ноября) россияне выпустили по Украине неназванное количество баллистических ракет "Искандер-М/KN-23" и противокорабельных ракетами "Циркон", 59 крылаты ракет Х-101/Х-59/Х-69/Искандер-К, а также 289 БПЛА (120…
Сегодня главным итогом атаки украинских БПЛА стал массированный удар по Ярославскому НПЗ. По заявлению местных властей, в атаке принимали участие 124 украинских беспилотника, летевших целенаправленно на НПЗ. (Воздушная тревога длилась около 5,5 часов)
В результате сегодняшней атаки повреждена промышленная инфраструктура НПЗ. По данным профильных OSINT-аналитиков и мониторинговых каналов, на территории завода очевидц…
Зеленский уже подтвердил готовность к дипломатии и выразил надежду, что эта встреча на экспертном уровне откроет путь к будущим прямым переговорам лидеров трех государств. Главным требованием Киева остаются надежные международные гарантии безопасности.
В свою очередь Песков отдельно подчеркнул, что участие европейских стран в данном раунде в Абу-Даби не предусмотрено — согласован исключительно трехсторонний формат п…
Прошли четыре года и двести пятьдесят два дня войны. На фронте никаких радикальных изменений за прошедшие сутки не произошло, и поэтому комментировать - нечего.
В ночь на сегодня (2 ноября) россияне выпустили по Украине 193 БПЛА (75 из которых - реактивные). Украинские силы ПВО перехватили 154 из них (в т.ч. 58 реактивных). Зафиксированы попадания “средств воздушного нападения противника” в 26 местах, а также падени…
Зеленский ответил так: “Да у нас были разные разговоры, несколько бесед с президентом Трампом и его командой об атаках на НПЗ. И мы заявили, что мы не можем не отвечать после ударов россиян по нашей энергетике, после того, как Россия убивает наших людей. Атаки на наше электричество, газ, заводы, на все подряд… Мы сказали: если вы хотите, чтобы мы не атаковали российские НПЗ, они должны перестать атаковать нашу энерго…
Есть у государя лишние деньги - вот он и блажит…
Сама же суть государства, его сердцевина - ужасна и некрасива. Государство - это палач и плаха. Это суд и тюрьма. Это армия и полиция. Это сыск и фиск. Дань, налоги, недоимка, долговая яма. Разорение и без того нищих. Это рекруты, казарма, плац, шпицрутены. Это границы, это законы, это власть. И ужасная, железная, неумолимая и неотвратимая жестокость и слепая сила. Гр…
Как тут не вспомнить знаменитую фразу из культового фильма “Чапаев”: “Белые приходят - грабят, красные приходят - грабят… Куда бедному крестьянину податься?”
Слава Украине!🇺🇦
Но (как я уже неоднократно писал) я веду свой “Дневник войны” не для лайков, а для того, чтобы высказывать свое мнение о том, что происходит. Поэтому, анализируя сегодняшние события и заявления, я (к своему огромному сожалению) вынужден повторить свой вчерашний прогноз: конца этой войне - не видно. Никакого сближения позиций и готовности к компромиссам я не вижу ни у России, ни у Украины. Извините, если я кого-то эти…
Прошли четыре года и двести пятьдесят один день войны. На фронте за последние сутки никаких изменений не произошло и поэтому комментировать - нечего. (Если, конечно, не считать изменениями некоторое количество убитых за прошедшие сутки с обеих сторон солдат…)
В ночь на сегодня (1 ноября) россияне выпустили по Украине 433 БПЛА (64 из которых были реактивными). Украинские силы ПВО перехватили 371 из них (в т.ч. 47 реа…
❤39👍25💩3🔥3🤡3🥰2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @AlfredKoh_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Альфред Кох” (@AlfredKoh_1), 6,797 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlfredKoh_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.