Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for American Renaissance

Channel

American Renaissance

@AmRenOfficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,079subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001406688869
TypeChannel
Username@AmRenOfficial
DescriptionFollow us: https://bio.link/americanrenaissance
Created14 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/AmRenOfficial

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,0538,1278,0906 August 2026 — 8,126 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,127 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,119 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,113 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,101 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,107 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,119 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,109 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,102 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,103 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,091 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,086 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,081 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,076 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,067 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,053 subscribers10 October 2026 — 8,086 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,090 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,091 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,090 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,085 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,077 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,075 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,079 subscribers8,0796 August 20264 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,042–8,138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 15:508,079+4
30 Oct 2026, 00:598,075-2
26 Oct 2026, 19:268,077-8
23 Oct 2026, 15:498,085-5
20 Oct 2026, 08:118,090-1
17 Oct 2026, 12:108,091+1
14 Oct 2026, 15:478,090+4
10 Oct 2026, 19:218,086+33
5 Oct 2026, 01:018,053-14
26 Sept 2026, 00:228,067-9
16 Sept 2026, 20:188,076-5
13 Sept 2026, 06:168,081-5
9 Sept 2026, 05:358,086-5
4 Sept 2026, 06:388,091-12
31 Aug 2026, 09:068,103+1
28 Aug 2026, 07:258,102-7
24 Aug 2026, 21:248,109-10
20 Aug 2026, 21:178,119+12
18 Aug 2026, 00:028,107+6
15 Aug 2026, 01:168,101first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.2%
avg views ÷ 8,079 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,850
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held56 (30 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total51,225
Reactions total768
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 11:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5
Videos
≈295
Links
≈1,190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
45h 49m
Average length
49m 59s

Measured directly from 55 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,686 reactions across 55 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,65098.7%
👎361.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,728 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 20:23 UTC667 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Thursday was a colossal defeat for Republicans. Jared Taylor and Paul Kersey ask whether they stayed home, changed their minds, or both?

👍18

5 Nov 2026, 15:18 UTC945 views21 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Is the SPLC a criminal enterprise? DOJ says it was stoking "hate," not fighting it.

👍21

5 Nov 2026, 12:19 UTC993 views21 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Waking up from the MAGA dream: Kevin DeAnna and Paul Kersey argue that with MAGA in ruins, and the Iran war to blame, the path is clear for something new. But do we actually want something new, or is the critique the point?

👍21

2 Nov 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,840 views58 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Anakin Skywalker, the tragic villain of the Star Wars prequels, has become a Gen Z icon. Kevin DeAnna and Paul Kersey explain why a betrayed generation is cheering the character who burned down a corrupt system, and deciding the “bad guys” might actually be the heroes.

👍56👎2

30 Oct 2026, 19:16 UTC≈1,740 views30 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

The White Man's Library: Just in time for Halloween, Paul Kersey and Sam Dickson cover "Devil's Night And Other True Tales of Detroit" — the definitive account of the city's annual arson orgy after the city turned majority black.

👍30

29 Oct 2026, 23:34 UTC≈1,810 views38 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Whites said "no more" when Somalis first arrived in 2002. Jared Taylor and Paul Kersey lament that early warnings were ignored.

👍38

29 Oct 2026, 20:24 UTC≈2,320 views60 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

President Trump has made terrible blunders, yet he has also done something no president did for 100 years.

👍57👎3

26 Oct 2026, 21:02 UTC≈2,080 views43 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Even a clear electoral victory means nothing in Latin America if the regime can simply change the rules afterward. As Kevin DeAnna and Paul Kersey explain, we desperately need to move past "democracy."

👍43

23 Oct 2026, 22:16 UTC≈2,500 views53 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

With enough will and determination, France could become great again. Will Présidente Le Pen have what it takes?

👍48👎5

23 Oct 2026, 17:46 UTC≈2,200 views46 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Is Douglas Murray coming in from the cold? Jared Taylor and Paul Kersey believe a prominent conservative is edging our way.

👍33👎13

22 Oct 2026, 19:04 UTC≈2,190 views47 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

The scenes from France look like zombie movies, and the genre was always political. Kevin DeAnna and Paul Kersey point out that society has already broken down internally; the zombie genre serves as a fantasy for total war and collapse.

👍47

15 Oct 2026, 22:58 UTC≈2,660 views36 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Is the net tightening on Ilhan? Jared Taylor and Paul Kersey look at possible grounds for lifting Ilhan Omar’s citizenship.

👍36

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @AmRenOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Vincent James
@RealVincentJames · 27,756
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 9 September 2026
Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
@realblaircottrell · 19,597
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 30 September 2026
Mark Collett
@markacollett · 20,356
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 27 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“American Renaissance” (@AmRenOfficial), 8,079 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AmRenOfficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.