Channel
@Aman_crypto_vip
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,614subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002153266609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Aman_crypto_vip |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Aman_crypto_vip |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 1,614 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 1,616 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:42 | 1,621 | +4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 1,617 | +14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 1,603 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 1,600 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 1,597 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 1,598 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 1,607 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 1,603 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 1,607 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 1,608 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 1,608 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
ZOOM FOR LIVE LONG AND SHORT TRADES - PRIME ALGO RIGHT SETTINGS TO TRADE - HOW TO USE LIQUIDITY MAP AND PRIME ALGO IN 1 TRADE 👉 LIVE PROFIT - Join Now https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81060958077?pwd=pIVkFRBuaGRmfyCWg98z7HYiHfmL8I.1
✅ SCALP TRADE - BNB 👉 ENTRY - $592 TO $584 👉 DIRECTION - LONG 👉 TARGET - $598 $604 $610 $616 $617.36 👉 SL - $565.26 🚨LEVERAGE - 10x 🔴TRADE VALID ON - https://support.weex.com/en/register?vipCode=0s0t4s Trader - ORANGE #nfa #DYOR
BTC SCALP TRADE TARGET 1✅ TARGET 2✅ TARGET 3✅ Done BTC LONG ALL TARGETS DONE🚀
✅ Try to Book some or all profit at TP2 We can’t trust market right now
🔴 BTCUSDT — SHORT SCALP TRADE Status: 🆕 New Trade Confidence: 🟢 8.5 / 10 ⚡ Current BTC: ~$64,980 ✅ Entry: $65,020 – $65,100 🔴 SL: $65,240 🎯 TP1: $64,850 🎯 TP2: $64,700 🎯 TP3: $64,520 🎯 TP4: $64,280 📢 TRADE ONLY VALID ON BINGX, WEEX AND COINSWITCH • Bingx - https://bingx.pro/partner/0s0t4s • CoinSwitch - https://coinswitch.co/pro/signup?code=FPryn • Weex (Non-KYC) - https://www.weex.com/en/register?vipCode=0s0t4s
Leave this trade , Don’t take 🙏 Market dropped the Volume
🔥Follow Buying Range properly and Tight SL Please 🙏 Don’t Greed 🙏
🟢 BTCUSDT — LONG SCALP TRADE Confidence: 🟢 8.2 / 10 ✅ Entry: $64,980 – $65,050 🔴 SL: $64,820 🎯 TP1: $65,180 🎯 TP2: $65,350 🎯 TP3: $65,550 🎯 TP4: $65,850 Reasoning: Bullish 5m & 15m structure with buyers still in control after the breakout. 🚫 Invalidation: Confirmed 5m close below $64,900. 📢 TRADE ONLY VALID ON BINGX, WEEX AND COINSWITCH • Bingx - https://bingx.pro/partner/0s0t4s • CoinSwitch - https://coinswitc…
✅ SCALP TRADE - GIGGLE 🏮 TYPE - LONG 👉 ENTRY - $33 - $32 👉 TARGET - $33.4, $, $33.8, $34.4, $35 & $35.8+ 👉 SL - $30.2 🚨LEVERAGE - 8x 🔴TRADE VALID ON - https://bingx.pro/partner/0s0t4s/ Trader - Apple #nfa #dyor
✅ SCALP TRADE - AAVE 🏮 TYPE - LONG 👉 ENTRY - $90 - $88 👉 TARGET - $90.8, $, $91.4, $92, $93 & $94+ 👉 SL - $86 🚨LEVERAGE - 10x 🔴TRADE VALID ON - https://bingx.pro/partner/0s0t4s/ Trader - Apple #nfa #dyor
✅ SCALP TRADE - CAKE 🏮 TYPE - LONG 👉 ENTRY - $1.40 - $1.37 👉 TARGET - $1.407, $1.412, $1.424, $1.436, $1.447 & $1.46+ 👉 SL - $1.34 🚨LEVERAGE - 10x 🔴TRADE VALID ON - https://bingx.pro/partner/0s0t4s/ Trader - Apple #nfa #dyor
ETH SCALP TRADE TARGET 1✅ TARGET 2✅ TARGET 3✅ TARGET 4✅ TARGET 5✅ Done ETH LONG ALL TARGETS DONE🚀
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Aman_crypto_vip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO AMAN VIP - By Crypto Leaks” (@Aman_crypto_vip), 1,614 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aman_crypto_vip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.