Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AmazingPolly.net

Channel

AmazingPolly.net

@AmazingPollyOriginal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,121subscribers

-326 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001360037740
TypeChannel
Username@AmazingPollyOriginal
Created14 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AmazingPollyOriginal

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,12118,44718,2846 August 2026 — 18,447 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,447 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,437 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,422 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,411 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,402 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,388 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,382 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,377 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,374 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,350 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,338 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,332 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,321 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,309 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,301 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,294 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,277 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,268 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,255 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,249 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,243 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,234 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,223 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,211 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,203 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,197 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,181 subscribers7 September 2026 — 18,148 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,121 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 36 days, net -326. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,072–18,496 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 00:2118,121-27
7 Sept 2026, 22:3818,148-33
4 Sept 2026, 21:0018,181-16
3 Sept 2026, 05:5318,197-6
2 Sept 2026, 00:0518,203-8
1 Sept 2026, 01:0518,211-12
30 Aug 2026, 22:5418,223-11
29 Aug 2026, 19:4518,234-9
28 Aug 2026, 19:3418,243-6
27 Aug 2026, 22:0418,249-6
26 Aug 2026, 18:5818,255-13
25 Aug 2026, 20:0318,268-9
24 Aug 2026, 22:3318,277-17
23 Aug 2026, 05:1318,294-7
21 Aug 2026, 20:3718,301-8
20 Aug 2026, 13:5918,309-12
19 Aug 2026, 14:1218,321-11
18 Aug 2026, 14:0418,332-6
17 Aug 2026, 12:2718,338-12
16 Aug 2026, 01:4418,350first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4h 06m
Average length
27m 22s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,408 reactions across 11 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
79156.2%
👍38227.1%
🔥1017.17%
🏆241.70%
🤔241.70%
👏191.35%
🙏171.21%
💯130.923%
👎100.71%
🖕90.639%
🤪40.284%
😢30.213%
🤩30.213%
👌20.142%
😍20.142%
👨‍💻10.071%
🤡10.071%
🤣10.071%
🫡10.071%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,408 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2025 to 11 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Apr 2026, 10:33 UTC≈5,320 views114 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Polly on X Polly on Web Polly on Bitchute Polly on Substack Polly on rumble

72👍32🤔5👎4🏆1

17 Oct 2025, 17:15 UTC≈11,000 views108 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/pollysfringeviews/p/sympathy?r=1lzb0h&utm_medium=ios

69🔥16🙏10👍8🤔5

9 May 2025, 08:20 UTC≈18,100 views190 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

5/25 Is Everything an 'op?!' No but the important stories never go viral. Why is that? I wanted to comment on the Shilo Hendrix story because Matt Walsh tried to make an example out of me for calling it an 'op.' After I address that I move on to exposing two HUGE truth bombs that fizzled out. So why do some stories get boosted by the Narrative Network while others are ignored? Here's my website: https://amazingpolly

115👍49👏9💯9👎4🏆2🔥2

5 Apr 2025, 09:53 UTC≈17,300 views130 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

4/25 A Big Thank You from the BUNKER! A brief update, a thank you and shout out to a special viewer, and a quick bunker 'tour' :) My web site is: https://amazingpolly.net/ My new substack blog is: https://pollysfringeviews.substack.com/

👍7451🤩3😍2

8 Mar 2025, 12:47 UTC≈19,600 views140 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

3/25 Ian's Adventures in the Narrative Network New alt-media 'superstar influencer' Ian Carroll doesn't care about the facts, as I show in this video. Visit my website here: https://amazingpolly.net/ Thanks for watching and sharing!

👍8438🤔9🏆4🖕3👎2

3 Mar 2025, 09:23 UTC≈18,800 views132 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

3/25 10,000 Foot View - The Epstein Binder Debacle Exposes the Narrative Network Consider this a high level overview of how the 'new media' Narrative Network of podcasters and social media influencers works to push agendas and generate public pressure on behalf of private interests and government contractors. I focus on the selected group who were called into the White House to receive copies of the evidence on Jeff

🔥6034👍23🏆5👏4🤪4👨‍💻1🖕1

23 Feb 2025, 10:49 UTC≈13,000 views144 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

2/25 My Fellow Orphans This one's more for women (real ones without penises!) ;) But if you're a man, I suppose you can listen too. Do you feel politically and maybe even socially orphaned as the world hardens into cult-like groups who demand total allegiance to their dogmas? I do. -- Visit my website here: https://amazingpolly.net/

117👍13🏆5💯4😢3🖕1🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AmazingPollyOriginal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AmazingPolly.net” (@AmazingPollyOriginal), 18,121 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AmazingPollyOriginal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.