Channel photo updated

Channel
Crypto Instincts π
@Amazing_Factss1
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
2,439subscribers
-55 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001604480992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Amazing_Factss1 |
| Created | 6 May 2022 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Amazing_Factss1 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 2,439 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 2,445 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 2,452 | -14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 2,466 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 2,470 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 2,472 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 2,477 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 2,489 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 2,491 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 2,494 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 2,494 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 6 May 2022 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 03s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
308 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 92 | 29.9% | |
| π± | 81 | 26.3% | |
| π | 42 | 13.6% | |
| π€― | 40 | 13.0% | |
| β‘ | 16 | 5.19% | |
| β€ | 14 | 4.55% | |
| π | 9 | 2.92% | |
| π€¬ | 5 | 1.62% | |
| π | 4 | 1.30% | |
| π€ | 3 | 0.974% | |
| π₯΄ | 2 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 308 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2022 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Channel name was changed to Β«Crypto Instincts πΒ»
US Navy Fires Upon and Seizes Iranian Vessel Near Strait of Hormuz π£ The US Navy opened fire and subsequently seized an Iranian vessel as it was exiting the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has withdrawn from the next round of negotiations and is threatening strikes against US Navy ships. There are only 2 days left until the nominal "truce" between the US and Iran expires, and a peace deal is nowhere in sight π€
π€¬2
Asian Stocks Rise Amid Tech Gains and US-Iran Tensions Asian stocks climbed on Monday, supported by moderate gains in technology shares, though overall sentiment remained cautious amid escalating tensions between the US and Iran. US stock futures edged lower during Asian trading hours on Monday, following record-breaking performances on Wall Street last week.
β€1π€¬1
Bitcoin is about to skyrocket
π19π±17β€2π€¬2π2
The crypto market every time Bitcoin hits $70,000.
π±19π€―11β‘5π2β€1π1
Bitcoin Records Largest Short Squeeze of 2026 Bitcoin has just experienced its most significant short liquidation event of the year. Over the last 48β72 hours, a massive "short squeeze" wiped out roughly $440 million in bearish bets as the price surged toward the $75,000 resistance level. This move effectively cleared the "short wall" that had been building up during the recent period of geopolitical uncertainty anβ¦
π±19π€―13π5π5π4β€3π1
Kelp DAO Exploit: $292 Million Stolen in Major DeFi Breach Kelp DAO, a prominent liquid restaking protocol, has suffered a massive security breach resulting in the theft of approximately $292 million. This incident currently stands as the largest DeFi exploit of 2026, sending shockwaves through the ecosystem and causing significant price volatility for related governance and liquidity tokens. Blockchain sleuth Zachβ¦
π18β‘2π2
Tether Freezes $3.29M USDT Linked to Rhea Finance Exploit Tether, the issuer of the USDT stablecoin, has officially frozen $3.29 million in assets tied to the recent hack of Rhea Finance (formerly known as Burrow Finance), a lending protocol on the NEAR ecosystem. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino confirmed the freeze, following rapid on-chain tracing by security analysts. This move prevents the attackers from laundering orβ¦
π€―16π±7β€1π1
Strategy Acquisition: Another $1 Billion in Bitcoin Strategy, led by Michael Saylor, purchased 13,927 BTC for $1 billion between April 6 and April 12, at an average purchase price of $71,902 per coin. As of April 12, Strategy holds a total of 780,897 BTC on its balance sheet (approximately 4% of the total supply). Since 2020, the company has spent roughly $59.02 billion on these acquisitions. The companyβs overallβ¦
π±19π8π1
A giant Bitcoin advertisement displayed over Lugano, Switzerland π¨π Bitcoin will swallow your fiat currency.
π15β‘9β€2
More than 15 years ago, Satoshi Nakamoto logged out of the Bitcoin forum and never returned. What would happen if he logged back into the system?
π15π6β€4π€3π2π₯΄2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Amazing_Factss1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kenyan_memesss Β· 49,576
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 45 here β alongside 44 others β read 25 August 2026
@HumorDEU Β· 24,090
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 64 here β alongside 63 others β read 16 September 2026
@FACTSJUNKIES Β· 36,517
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 55 here β alongside 54 others β read 1 September 2026
@The_Nairobian Β· 78,580
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 47 here β alongside 46 others β read 18 August 2026
@DuncanNdungu Β· 26,288
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 57 here β alongside 56 others β read 12 September 2026
@updateee Β· 42,198
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 60 here β alongside 59 others β read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βCrypto Instincts πβ (@Amazing_Factss1), 2,439 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Amazing_Factss1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.