Channel
@Ancestry88
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
202subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002220031656 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ancestry88 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ancestry88 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 202 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 204 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 203 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 197 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:40 | 197 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 21 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
71 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 78.9% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 14.1% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 4.23% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
White brothers,have you joined our top channels yet? -Genetics and exploration of Albanian race: t.me/Ancestry88 🧬 -Pro-Ukrainian channel t.me/albaniaforukraine 🇺🇦 -Pura Odium: t.me/PuraOdium 🇦🇱🏴☠️
Signed Tosku
New lynn study
❤1
Signed plebocus
IQ map europe based on data of Richard Lynn We observe:- 1.High iq scores in Scandinavian and west european nations on average 2.We see low iq scores on average in Mediterranean,Balkanic,Baltic and eastern european nations as compared to Scandinavians and West Europeans Cro magnon upper Paleolithic race was more intelligent than modern europeans Source:-https://constantincretan.wordpress.com/2011/01/04/northern-pa…
❤1
Signed plebocus
A more accurate one by a macedonian mutual, on qpadm
❤7
Signed plebocus
Macedonian channel posts a g25 map with a bad model. First off with g25 it isnt that accurate, and u have to really select the right groups to use. Albanians dont have thracian nor levant roman era. Thracian lowers p value on qpadm, and only .2% of ev13 in Albanians is daco thracian
❤4
Signed plebocus
Ancestry88 pinned «New balkan samples have dropped thanks to david reich»
New balkan samples have dropped thanks to david reich
🤝3
Signed plebocus
Italian fascist magazine "La difeza della razza" (defense of the race) published from 1938 to 1943,who's purpose was to show anthropology studies and prove difference between races. Here it mentions Albanians as descendants of Paleo Balkanic people (illyrians,thracians,hellenes etc) and mentions similarity between Italian and Albanian folk. One of the pages says: (Page 19) - The racial problem, so deeply felt by the …
❤7👌1
Signed plebocus
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed plebocus
Also note the amount of hyphens, typically common usage by ai.
❤5
Signed plebocus
“This wasn't just survival; it was a flourishing. Today, the highest global frequencies of I2 are found in the heart of former Illyrian territory—specifically in modern-day Croatia and Bosnia. This suggests that the "original" Illyrians were just as much descended from ancient European hunters as they were from Steppe warriors.” it was flourishing bc whgs had already been killed of. Ironically the i2 in slavs might …
❤7
Signed plebocus
he chose the funniest sources. Bc not only do all of them say Albanians are illyrian, but none of them have any indicator of r1a and i2a1b being Illyrian.
❤6
Signed plebocus
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Ancestry88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Prejardhja Shqiptare” (@Ancestry88), 202 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ancestry88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.