Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ANDRE MARSIGLIA OFICIAL

Channel

ANDRE MARSIGLIA OFICIAL

@AndreMarsigliaOfficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,457subscribers

-10,539 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001083060676
TypeChannel
Username@AndreMarsigliaOfficial
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AndreMarsigliaOfficial

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,45724,99619,726.57 August 2026 — 24,996 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,996 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,802 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,714 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,605 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,490 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,405 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,262 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,122 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,955 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,810 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,665 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,509 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,459 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,421 subscribers23 August 2026 — 23,314 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,124 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,873 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,495 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,430 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,686 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,302 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,723 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,335 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,035 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,623 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,098 subscribers7 September 2026 — 18,265 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,063 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,383 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,825 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,166 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,457 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -10,539. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,876–26,577 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:2014,457-709
16 Sept 2026, 00:0015,166-659
14 Sept 2026, 08:1515,825-558
12 Sept 2026, 14:5816,383-680
10 Sept 2026, 13:5717,063-1,202
7 Sept 2026, 10:1618,265-833
4 Sept 2026, 16:4119,098-525
3 Sept 2026, 00:3719,623-412
2 Sept 2026, 01:1720,035-300
1 Sept 2026, 04:2620,335-388
31 Aug 2026, 01:0420,723-579
29 Aug 2026, 21:3221,302-384
28 Aug 2026, 22:3421,686-744
27 Aug 2026, 19:2522,430-65
26 Aug 2026, 21:2322,495-378
25 Aug 2026, 21:0222,873-251
24 Aug 2026, 21:4423,124-190
23 Aug 2026, 10:2823,314-107
21 Aug 2026, 19:2823,421-38
20 Aug 2026, 14:2223,459first reading

Engagement

218 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.55%
avg views ÷ 14,457 subscribers
Avg views / post
224
90 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
90
of 218 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held218 (6 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total20,115
Reactions total1,693
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 08m
Average length
2m 46s

Measured directly from 68 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,977 reactions across 215 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,32233.2%
1,14228.7%
💯1,05326.5%
3047.64%
👏491.23%
🆒370.93%
👌320.805%
😎210.528%
🫡70.176%
60.151%
🍾20.05%
🕊10.025%
🤝10.025%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 215 of the 218 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,977 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 218 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 22:07 UTC163 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Mendonça admite encontro com Vorcaro e dá resposta que Moraes nunca deu https://www.estadao.com.br/politica/coluna-do-estadao/andre-mendonca-admite-ter-recebido-daniel-vorcaro-em-instituto-em-sp/

9👍6💯1

2 Sept 2026, 21:47 UTC179 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Fachin foge de se comprometer com investigação de Moraes! Assista a análise completa no meu canal no YouTube.

👍9💯43

2 Sept 2026, 16:18 UTC193 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Fachin se manifesta sobre o escândalo de Moraes e não diz nada, como de costume https://www.estadao.com.br/politica/cargo-nao-confere-privilegio-mas-impoe-limite-diz-fachin-apos-relatorio-da-pf-sobre-moraes/

7👍6💯43

2 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC183 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🚨Os editoriais de hoje dos jornalões pedem a renúncia de Moraes, não acontecerá. Ele sabe que poderá voltar a ser tratado como salvador da pátria, por esses mesmos jornais, se retomar a caça aos bolsonaristas. Também sabe que, ano que vem, se Lula e Alcolumbre estiverem no comando, quem pode se dar mal é Mendonça. Vai aguardar, como Vorcaro, a coisa amainar. Porém, investigado, qualquer tentativa de interferir no pr

💯8👍321

2 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC198 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Moraes e Mendonça quase parem para agressão física no STF! Assista a análise completa no meu canal no YouTube.

💯74👍4👏1

2 Sept 2026, 01:15 UTC218 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Os ministros da “ala Moraes” tentarão salvar o colega reduzindo tudo a uma briga entre Mendonça e Moraes. Assim, pretendem esconder que Mendonça está fazendo seu trabalho e que Moraes pode ter cometido crimes Ao colocar Mendonça e Moraes como adversários em um ringue, a estratégia é igualar os dois, politizar o caso e lançar uma cortina de fumaça sobre a questão jurídica. Boa parte da imprensa ecoará essa narrati

👍208💯82

2 Sept 2026, 01:05 UTC192 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🚨Escrita em português sofrível, a nota do escritório da esposa do Moraes parece admitir que o ministro, de fato, revisou o contrato com Vorcaro, supostamente para avaliar possíveis impedimentos do ministro. Se foi isso mesmo, não importa a razão, confessa-se uma atuação privada do ministro, que pode, após investigação, configurar advocacia administrativa (art. 321 do CP)

6💯4👍32

2 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC210 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🚨 Mendonça levantou o sigilo para expor os absurdos do caso Moraes, evitando nulidades, e levará a questão ao Plenário, garantindo transparência. Ainda assim, há quem o critique na imprensa. O Brasil merece o que enfrenta. Não é possível.

11👍8💯3🆒1

2 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC207 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🚨O parecer da PGR não vincula Mendonça, ou seja, não serve para nada. Mas, se Gonet considera nula uma investigação que avançou sem passar por ele, deveria pedir a anulação dos inquéritos conduzidos de ofício por Moraes há sete anos.

10💯7👍5🤝1

1 Sept 2026, 23:24 UTC195 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Guerra explode: Moraes prepara contra-ataque contra Mendonça https://www.metropoles.com/colunas/andreza-matais/exclusivo-moraes-e-mendonca-batem-boca-e-quase-chegam-as-vias-de-fato-no-stf

👍743💯3

1 Sept 2026, 21:13 UTC219 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Mendonça dá xeque-mate em Moraes e obriga STF a julgar o ministro https://www.metropoles.com/colunas/andreza-matais/vorcaro-transferiu-cotas-de-jato-legacy-650-para-viviane-barci-de-moraes

14👍13💯7

1 Sept 2026, 18:02 UTC199 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Mendonça Avalia Colocar Moraes no Inquérito do Master: Veja! Assista a análise completa no meu canal no YouTube.

9👍5💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 218 posts we hold for @AndreMarsigliaOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ANDRE MARSIGLIA OFICIAL” (@AndreMarsigliaOfficial), 14,457 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AndreMarsigliaOfficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.