ДО МЕНЯ КСТАТИ ТОЛЬКО ДОШЛО То что написано в начале типо Диккор ЭТО ТИПО ЕГО ИМЕ БЛЯТЬ ПХПГАЗАХАЗ СУКА ЕГО ТИПР ЗОВУТ ДИКОР НО СОКРАЩЁННО ПРОСТО ДИ, ЕБАНУТСЯ
❤1🤯1

Channel
@Andreyqwqlol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002553457970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Andreyqwqlol |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Andreyqwqlol |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 48 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 46 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 46 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 57.9% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ДО МЕНЯ КСТАТИ ТОЛЬКО ДОШЛО То что написано в начале типо Диккор ЭТО ТИПО ЕГО ИМЕ БЛЯТЬ ПХПГАЗАХАЗ СУКА ЕГО ТИПР ЗОВУТ ДИКОР НО СОКРАЩЁННО ПРОСТО ДИ, ЕБАНУТСЯ
❤1🤯1
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
Кстати фан факт про этот стикер с фразой "Супчик кучерявый" это моя фирменная фраза что я придумал и типо юзал постоянно вместо мата
❤1🤔1
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
И самое главное.. Я сделал к этой залупе СТИКЕРПАК
❤1
Настоящий дневник Диктора! обзор! (Как минимум по мнению 10 летнего меня) Если у вас не грущетя видео перейдите по ссылке на ютуб версиюhttps : ://youtu.be/vAxxRtW2pPM?si=Pft4l_LvvMIGxp6u И версия в тик токе : https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4nM8C7j/ Я очень заебался с этим видео, так что попрошу вас оценить шутки мишутки и мои старания , что больше всего понравилось и т.д. если зайдёт такой формат сделаю обзор на что нибудь…
❤1🤔1
Пора мне перестать откладывать выкладывание любого нового контента на потом потому что я забываю про него в последнее Ща будет ульта #РассказыДяди
❤1🤔1
Разрешите похвастаться Ебанутся, у меня самая пиздатая девушка в мире. Вы только гляньте какой шедевр она мне заказала :р Восторг, мне очень нравится 💥 В общем у меня был готов для вас один контент небольшой, но Гвен его чутка РАЗЕБАЛА БЛЯ и придётся чутка подождать 💔 #РассказыДяди
❤3❤🔥2👏1
Что ж , помимо долго жданной (надеюсь что долгожданной) 3 главы и частичного передавания первых 2 глав , я заебашал вам пролог с тем как вообще все у них началось и планирую я сделать это все одновременно что бы вы могли полностью погрузиться во всю историю занова . Буду очень рад каждому вашему отзыву 🌹 #Рассказыдяди #ГородХ
❤2🔥1
Там тоже была темкс параллельными вселенными и типо там была война между всеми вселенными :"0 Судя по году когда я это выкладовал,мне было лет 10, это ахуеть просто Сорян что качество такое гавно, это лучшее что я смог откопать для понимания о чем идёт речь Вообще теоретически аушка похожа на мою новую , я в ахуе #ЗБ #РассказыДяди
❤2🔥1
Я РЕЗКО ПОНЯЛ ЧТО КАЖЕТСЯ ЕЩЁ В ПРИМЕРНО 2019 ГОДУ СОЗДАВАЛ УЖЕ ПОХОЖУЮ АУШКУ , ВАШУ Ж МАТЬ... Я СОВСЕМ ЗАБЫЛ ПРО НЕЁ В общем она была создана по концепту игры из Джекс Бокс Пати Пака - Смертельная вечеринка. Кто знает тот знает эту легенду, а кто не знает изучите, не пожалеете. В общем сама суть игры была в том что участники попадают на вечеринку где они обязаны отвечать на вопросы правельно, иначе их затащат в подв…
❤2🤯1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Andreyqwqlol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Andreyqwqlol named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“☀️ The Solar Temple ☀️” (@Andreyqwqlol), 48 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Andreyqwqlol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.