Channel
@AngewandtePsychonautik
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
910subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001777396065 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AngewandtePsychonautik |
| Created | 29 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AngewandtePsychonautik |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:56 | 910 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 912 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 915 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 911 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 916 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 916 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
37 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 45.9% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 13.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 10.8% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 10.8% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 8.11% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 8.11% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Schon seit Jahrhunderten wird in der Debatte um die 'Echtheit' mystischer Erfahrungen als ein wesentliches Kriterium die Wirkung auf das Leben des Betroffenen angeführt. Die Frage der Authentizität hat nicht zuletzt die Kirchen beschäftigt, die immer wieder mit Visionen und Propheten beschäftigt waren, die authentische Erscheinungen behaupteten, deren Inhalt aber oftmals mit kirchlichen Paradigmen nicht übereinstimmt…
👍2
'Überall liegt eine grammatische Mystik, wie mir scheint, zum Grunde– die sehr leicht das erste Erstaunen über Sprache und Schrift erregen konnte– Die wilden Völker halten die Schrift noch jetzt für Zauberei.' 'Die Seele strebt bei jedem Begriffe nach einem genetisch-intuitiven Worte (Formel).– Sie versteht einen Begriff, wenn sie ihn fertig machen und auf alle Weise behandeln kann, zu Geist und zu Materie machen.' …
Ein Lichtstrahl bricht sich noch in etwas ganz anderes als in Farben. Wenigstens ist der Lichtstrahl einer Beseelung fähig, wo sich dann die Seele in Seelenfarben bricht. ~ Novalis, Traktat vom Licht Art Laurits Andersen Ring
Yukari Chikura, Fluorite Fantasia
❤1
Nur in dir bestaun ich mich Schöner malt sich mir die schöne Erde, Heller spiegelt in des Freunds Gebärde, Reizender der Himmel sich. — Friedrich Schiller, die Freundschaft
❤3
Sekine Untei, Anemones
❤1
Goethe an Charlotte von Stein, 1778
🕊1
Was bestimmt unser Lebensglück? Haben wir es den Ereignissen zu danken, von deren Wirbel wir fortgerissen werden? Oder ist nicht vielmehr unser Temperament gleichsam der Farbenton aller Ereignisse? Tritt uns nicht alles im Spiegel unsrer eignen Persönlichkeit entgegen? Und geben nicht die Ereignisse gleichsam nur die Tonart unsres Geschickes an, während die Stärke und Schwäche, mit der es uns trifft, lediglich von un…
❤1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2🕊1
Eins muss er wieder können: fallen, geduldig in der Schwere ruhn, der sich vermaß, den Vögeln allen im Fliegen es zuvorzutun. Rainer Maria Rilke, Wenn etwas mir vom Fenster fällt, 1901 Art The beauty of the heavens, Constellations Lyra and Cygnus
❤🔥2
Der Mensch hat immer Werden und Vergehen am Gleichnis des Baumes zu begreifen versucht– Es hat seinen Grund, daß wir in einer dem Baum abholden Zeit leben. Die Wälder schwinden, die alten Stämme fallen, und das erklärt sich nicht durch Ökonomie allein. Die Ökonomie ist hier nur mitwirkend, ist vollziehend, denn zugleich leben wir in einer Zeit, in der auf unerhörte Weise verschwendet wird... Der Mythos erkennt jedo…
✍1❤1👏1
Für den vorgeschichtlichen Menschen hat eine Götterwelt im Sinne von der Natur separierbarer Entitäten nicht existiert. Er nahm vermutlich die gesamte Natur als beseelt wahr und erkannte ihr als Gesamtheit eine göttliche Wirklichkeit zu. Lediglich Anteile abzuspalten mag er gewohnt gewesen sein und für separate Entitäten gehalten haben... Von diesem die gesamte Natur repräsentierenden gottartigen Wesen ist die Mensch…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AngewandtePsychonautik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Angewandte Psychonautik 🍃” (@AngewandtePsychonautik), 910 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AngewandtePsychonautik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.