Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AnonAsk 💬

Bot

AnonAsk 💬

@AnonAsk_iBot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

106,535monthly users

+51,797 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID8643764783
TypeBot
Username@AnonAsk_iBot
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/AnonAsk_iBot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,890106,53565,212.56 August 2026 — 54,738 monthly users9 August 2026 — 56,838 monthly users10 August 2026 — 58,577 monthly users11 August 2026 — 59,245 monthly users11 August 2026 — 59,245 monthly users12 August 2026 — 59,816 monthly users13 August 2026 — 60,659 monthly users14 August 2026 — 60,896 monthly users15 August 2026 — 62,084 monthly users18 August 2026 — 62,280 monthly users19 August 2026 — 62,474 monthly users20 August 2026 — 62,805 monthly users22 August 2026 — 63,075 monthly users23 August 2026 — 63,173 monthly users25 August 2026 — 64,115 monthly users26 August 2026 — 64,637 monthly users27 August 2026 — 65,360 monthly users29 August 2026 — 66,595 monthly users29 August 2026 — 67,029 monthly users31 August 2026 — 67,582 monthly users2 September 2026 — 67,212 monthly users5 September 2026 — 54,312 monthly users8 September 2026 — 44,642 monthly users11 September 2026 — 42,284 monthly users14 September 2026 — 40,009 monthly users18 September 2026 — 39,485 monthly users24 September 2026 — 34,958 monthly users3 October 2026 — 24,653 monthly users8 October 2026 — 24,527 monthly users12 October 2026 — 24,449 monthly users15 October 2026 — 23,890 monthly users16 October 2026 — 55,749 monthly users17 October 2026 — 94,079 monthly users18 October 2026 — 102,026 monthly users20 October 2026 — 106,535 monthly users6 August 202620 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 75 days, net +51,797. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,493–118,932 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
20 Oct 2026, 16:39106,535+4,509
18 Oct 2026, 16:39102,026+7,947
17 Oct 2026, 15:1094,079+38,330
16 Oct 2026, 12:4655,749+31,859
15 Oct 2026, 13:3723,890-559
12 Oct 2026, 21:0824,449-78
8 Oct 2026, 06:1624,527-126
3 Oct 2026, 18:5624,653-10,305
24 Sept 2026, 20:5734,958-4,527
18 Sept 2026, 17:2139,485-524
14 Sept 2026, 12:4240,009-2,275
11 Sept 2026, 04:1942,284-2,358
8 Sept 2026, 08:1844,642-9,670
5 Sept 2026, 05:3754,312-12,900
2 Sept 2026, 03:0467,212-370
31 Aug 2026, 01:2567,582+553
29 Aug 2026, 22:2267,029+434
29 Aug 2026, 01:2566,595+1,235
27 Aug 2026, 04:1365,360+723
26 Aug 2026, 02:5364,637first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AnonAsk 💬” (@AnonAsk_iBot), 106,535 monthly users as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnonAsk_iBot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.