Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”°

Channel

𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”°

@Anti_PaulDenialists

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

218subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001633750244
TypeChannel
Username@Anti_PaulDenialists
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Anti_PaulDenialists

Topic

Religion β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2172212196 August 2026 β€” 221 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 221 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 220 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 218 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 217 subscribers5 September 2026 β€” 220 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 218 subscribers2186 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 216–222 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 07:16218-2
5 Sept 2026, 18:00220+3
29 Aug 2026, 09:43217-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:13218-2
14 Aug 2026, 16:17220-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:17221no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:36221first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 October 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1634.8%
πŸ’―1021.7%
πŸ†510.9%
⚑36.52%
πŸ”₯36.52%
🀩36.52%
πŸŽ‰24.35%
πŸ‘24.35%
❀12.17%
🐳12.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC46 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Does God Hate Paul? | Romans 7 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”°

18 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTC256 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”° | π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•±π–†π–‘π–˜π–Š π•Ώπ–Šπ–†π–ˆπ–π–Šπ–—π–˜

πŸ†5😁2

20 Jun 2026, 15:44 UTC171 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Paul clearly echoes teachings of Jesus without referring to them: Rom. 12:14 = Mt. 5:44; Rom. 12:17 = Mt. 5:39ff.; Rom. 13:7 = Mt. 22:15-22; Rom. 14:13-14 = Lk. 17:1-2; Rom. 14:14 = Mk. 7:15; 1 Thess. 5:2 = Mt. 24:34; 1 Thess. 5:13 = Mk. 9:50; 1 Thess. 5:15 = Mt. 5:39-47. 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”°

πŸ”₯3⚑2πŸ‘2

12 Jun 2026, 23:49 UTC158 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Did Paul Preach a Different Gospel than Jesus? [ YT Version ] 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”°

11 Jun 2026, 23:46 UTC137 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Jesus' Gospel vs Paul's Gospel ? [ YT Version ] 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”° | 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 β„Œπ”’π”Ÿπ”―π”’π”΄ β„œπ”¬π”¬π”±π”° π•Žπ• π•£π•œπ•€-𝔹𝕒𝕀𝕖𝕕 π•Šπ•’π•π•§π•’π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•šπ•€π•₯

⚑1

10 Jun 2026, 23:45 UTC114 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Is there a contradiction in the accounts of the Road to Damascus story between: Acts 9:5-8 AND Acts 22:8-10 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”°

8 Jun 2026, 23:44 UTC122 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @flatearthPoll

Did Paul, the pharisee, ever contradict the words and teachings of Jesus Christ? Feel free to share any potential examples

  1. Yes, he contradicted Jesus19%
  2. No, he taught the exact teachings of Jesus43%
  3. Unsure38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

πŸŽ‰2

7 Jun 2026, 23:44 UTC104 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

Paul's THIRD Missionary Journey 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”°

6 Jun 2026, 23:43 UTC108 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Gnostics of the Second Century claiming Authority doesn't discard Paul being an Apostle 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”° | 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”π”²π” π”¦π”£π”’π”―π”¦π”žπ”«π”¦π”°π”ͺ | 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 𝔖𝔲𝔫𝔫𝔦 π”„π”°π”°π”©π”žπ”ͺ

5 Jun 2026, 23:43 UTC100 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”°

😁2

4 Jun 2026, 23:37 UTC104 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”°

🀩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Anti_PaulDenialists. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Jun 2026, 23:44 UTCAnonymous Poll1,570 voters approx.

Did Paul, the pharisee, ever contradict the words and teachings of Jesus Christ? Feel free to share any potential examples

  1. Yes, he contradicted Jesus19%
  2. No, he taught the exact teachings of Jesus43%
  3. Unsure38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2025 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ”„π”«π”±π”¦ π”“π”žπ”²π”© π”‡π”’π”«π”¦π”žπ”©π”¦π”°π”±π”°β€ (@Anti_PaulDenialists), 218 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Anti_PaulDenialists.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.