Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آنتی کیسه پلاس +

Channel

آنتی کیسه پلاس +

@Antikice_plus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,195subscribers

+6,553 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001783101732
TypeChannel
Username@Antikice_plus
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Antikice_plus

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,63123,15618,393.57 August 2026 — 13,642 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,642 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,652 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,631 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,723 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,081 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,514 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,942 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,653 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,626 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,519 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,877 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,068 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,119 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,156 subscribers23 August 2026 — 22,914 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,804 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,383 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,146 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,748 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,454 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,272 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,267 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,226 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,199 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,220 subscribers5 September 2026 — 20,163 subscribers8 September 2026 — 20,066 subscribers11 September 2026 — 20,195 subscribers20,1957 August 202611 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net +6,553. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,202–24,585 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 03:3820,195+129
8 Sept 2026, 07:1720,066-97
5 Sept 2026, 04:4120,163-57
3 Sept 2026, 06:4620,220+21
2 Sept 2026, 00:0620,199-27
1 Sept 2026, 01:3520,226-41
31 Aug 2026, 02:1320,267-5
30 Aug 2026, 05:0220,272-182
29 Aug 2026, 02:5620,454-294
28 Aug 2026, 03:4220,748-398
27 Aug 2026, 02:4721,146-237
26 Aug 2026, 05:4321,383-1,421
25 Aug 2026, 02:2422,804-110
23 Aug 2026, 13:3622,914-242
21 Aug 2026, 21:5823,156+37
20 Aug 2026, 14:4423,119+51
19 Aug 2026, 17:3523,068+1,191
18 Aug 2026, 19:5521,877+358
17 Aug 2026, 19:3821,519+4,893
16 Aug 2026, 15:4516,626first reading

Engagement

586 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.2%
avg views ÷ 20,195 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,270
453 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
453
of 586 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 397 of 453 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held586 (6 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total1,482,035
Reactions total42,034
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44m 10s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 68 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

57,327 reactions across 521 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18,57432.4%
👍16,50528.8%
🔥4,4187.71%
👏3,8526.72%
🤣3,6866.43%
😡3,1935.57%
👎3,1765.54%
😁2,0223.53%
💔1,2202.13%
😍2470.431%
❤‍🔥1380.241%
🤯1160.202%
🤔750.131%
👀280.049%
🫡260.045%
🤝230.04%
110.019%
🏆70.012%
😈60.01%
20.003%
2 further kinds20.003%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 527 of the 586 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57,327 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 586 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 21:29 UTC448 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎁برای کاربران بری‌بت🎁 🚨بونوس‌های فعال ورزشی🚨 👑👑 بونوس خوش آمدگویی👑 👑بالاترین ضرایب بین تمامی سایت ها👑 👑🔢🔢درصد شارژ اضافه برای واریز از طریق کریپتو ⭐️چرخش چرخ و فلک به ازای هر ۲میلیون تومان واریز 👑🔢🔢درصد بازگشت نقدی روزانه👑 👑 تا 🔠🔠 درصد سود برد👍 🤔 آدرس سایت: 🔗 https://jdghoisdiu.shop/fa/affiliates/?btag=914641_l303106 ✔️کانال رسمی ما: 🅰11 🔗 https://t.me/BerryBetOfficial

👎1

2 Sept 2026, 21:29 UTC449 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

اگه دنبال یه انتخاب خوب هستی بری‌بت با شماست😎🔥

👎1

2 Sept 2026, 21:11 UTC≈3,930 views190 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🚨تارتار به این نتیجه رسیده که پرسپولیس نیاز به یک رهبر در خط هافبک داره و نیم فصل قطعا در این پست تقویت خواهیم شد 🔴@Antikice_plus 🚩

145👍43😁2

2 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC≈4,540 views165 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

20 بازی بدون شکست 🔥 حسرت کیسه در آستانه ده سالگی 🔴@Antikice_plus 🚩

144🔥18😁2👍1

2 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC≈4,490 views95 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❗عقل بازیکن ایرانی ! ۲۱ شوت سمت دروازه کیسه زدیم فقط یک گل بایدم کیسه کشا از مساوی شاد باشند 🔴@Antikice_plus 🚩

👍829👎2👏2

2 Sept 2026, 18:18 UTC≈4,330 views159 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

💣🚨⚽️ فوووووووووووری از تسنیم؛ پرسپولیس قرار از یاسر آسانی مستقیم تو فیفا شکایت کنه نه کمیته انضباطی! 🔴@Antikice_plus 🚩

👍13425

2 Sept 2026, 18:01 UTC≈4,050 views97 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❗با اینکه مساوی حکم برد واسه کیسه داشت اما حسرتشون کم کم داره 10 ساله میشه 🔴@Antikice_plus 🚩

👍829🔥6

2 Sept 2026, 17:58 UTC≈3,280 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔰پایان بازی با تساوی یک بر یک روزی که راحت میشد بازی برد فرصت سوزی کردیم 🔴@Antikice_plus 🚩

👍47🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 17:50 UTC≈3,340 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026

توپ خورد دست دفاع استقلال 😐

👍18

2 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC≈3,640 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026

اگه بازی مساوی بشه مقصر خودمون هستیم فرصت ها رو خوب استفاده نکردیم

👍43

2 Sept 2026, 17:45 UTC≈3,500 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026

بازم نبض بازی اومد دست ما

👍10👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 586 posts we hold for @Antikice_plus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

آنتی کیسه
@Antikice46 · 67,010
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
💥آیا میدانستید....💥
@AYA_MIDANSTIID1 · 53,939
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
𝙍𝙚𝙙 𝙊𝙣𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚
@Red_onIine · 32,597
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
Tahlil *P* Iran
@tahlil_Perspolis_iran64 · 33,336
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آنتی کیسه پلاس +” (@Antikice_plus), 20,195 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Antikice_plus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.