
Channel
APARCHIT SSC CGL RAILWAY | CHSL | MTS | CPO | OTHERS
@Aparchit_SSC_Railway_Pdfs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,940subscribers
-107 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001673476929 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Aparchit_SSC_Railway_Pdfs |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Aparchit_SSC_Railway_Pdfs |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 6,940 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 6,944 | -14 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 6,958 | -21 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 6,979 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 6,985 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 6,994 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 7,003 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 7,003 | -15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 7,018 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 7,025 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 7,029 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 7,039 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 7,047 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@gadiscussionchannel · 55,593
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
@SSC_EXAMS_UPDATES · 100,778
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@GKTrick02 · 229,932
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 11 August 2026
@drgauravgargog · 151,442
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 August 2026
@OliveboardApp · 75,629
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“APARCHIT SSC CGL RAILWAY | CHSL | MTS | CPO | OTHERS” (@Aparchit_SSC_Railway_Pdfs), 6,940 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aparchit_SSC_Railway_Pdfs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.