2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Oct 2026, 11:22
8
no change
19 Oct 2026, 10:47
8
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 13 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
203.6%
avg views ÷ 8 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.3
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
54.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026
Posts held
8 (13 October 2026 – 18 October 2026)
Views total
114
Reactions total
62
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
62 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
22
35.5%
💯
14
22.6%
👍
10
16.1%
⚡
6
9.68%
👏
6
9.68%
❤
2
3.23%
🙏
2
3.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как я работаю. Полный процесс.
Я не продаю консультации. Я не продаю время. Я решаю задачу.
И вот как это выглядит на практике.
Первый этап. Знакомство.
Мы созваниваемся. Или встречаемся. Неважно.
Я не начинаю с презентаций и графиков. Я задаю вопросы. Что происходит в вашем бизнесе? Где болит? Куда хотите прийти? Чего боитесь? Что уже пробовали?
Вы говорите. Я слушаю. Не перебиваю. Потому что на этом этапе мне…
Ошибка часть 2
🔲Если человек не покупает подписку Apollo, он не теряет гарантированную прибыль.
Так говорить неправильно.
🔲Он теряет другое. Инфраструктуру, которая снижает количество системных ошибок в работе с капиталом.
Вот эти ошибки.
🟩Первая. Зависеть от одного источника решений.
Один трейдер. Одна стратегия. Один аналитик. Собственное мнение. Пока всё работает, модель кажется удобной. Но в момент смены ры…
Пять ошибок, которые стоят инвестору дороже подписки.
Ошибка №1. Зависеть от одного трейдера или одной стратегии.
Пока результат строится вокруг одного источника, у капитала одна точка отказа. Этот источник перестаёт работать — страдает всё.
Ошибка №2. Думать, что несколько стратегий — это диверсификация.
Пять стратегий могут зависеть от одного рыночного сценария. В спокойном рынке это незаметно. В стрессовый мо…
🔲Обо мне 3 часть
И мы поняли - что инвесторы могу торговать сами или зайти на подписку Apollo !)
Сейчас Apollo на третьем этапе. Этапе масштабирования.
Первый этап был про идею. Второй про создание технологии и инфраструктуры
Сегодня главный вопрос уже не в том, работает ли концепция. Вопрос в том, насколько далеко мы можем её масштабировать.
Что уже есть?
Более 100 клиентов. Суммарный объём под управлением — б…
Обо мне 2 часть
После идеи началась инфраструктура.
Не концепция. Не презентация. Сборка.
Мы начали строить технологический контур. Данные.
Систему отбора стратегий. Риск-модели. Портфельную логику. Мониторинг. Клиентский продукт.
Постепенно Apollo превращался из гипотезы в работающую систему.
Она анализирует большой массив торговых стратегий и помогает собирать из них управляемую портфельную архитектуру.
Сего…
Обо мне часть 1
В инвестиции я пришёл не за продуктом.
Мне всегда было интересно другое. Почему один инвестор действует системно, а другой — зависит от чужого мнения, эмоций или одной стратегии.
Я погружался в рынок. И чем глубже, тем яснее становилась проблема.
У частного инвестора есть информация.
Много информации
Но нет инфраструктуры, которая помогла бы её отбирать, сравнивать и собирать в систему.
У крупны…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ApolloAI23. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Apollo AI” (@ApolloAI23), 8 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ApolloAI23.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.