Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Apusthetics 🐸

Channel

Apusthetics 🐸

@Apusthetics

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,439subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735792666
TypeChannel
Username@Apusthetics
Created21 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Apusthetics

Growth

1,4391,4511,4456 August 2026 — 1,450 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,450 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,451 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,449 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,451 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,448 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,445 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,444 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,441 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,442 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,439 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 35 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,437–1,453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 23:381,439-3
4 Sept 2026, 19:201,442+1
28 Aug 2026, 23:541,441-3
25 Aug 2026, 14:021,444-1
19 Aug 2026, 03:051,445-3
16 Aug 2026, 04:031,448-3
12 Aug 2026, 20:231,451+2
9 Aug 2026, 20:311,449-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:581,451+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:451,450no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:561,450first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

672 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 593617585000834989032848.8%
18627.7%
🔥578.48%
🥰466.85%
😢162.38%
😱162.38%
🤣152.23%
❤‍🔥30.446%
🙏30.446%
😍10.149%
🤯10.149%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 672 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Apusthetics. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 March 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC177 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Me and Vivor fren on our own Peeper expedition 😵

10custom 59361758500083498909🤯1

2 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC219 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @OceanspeelvnPhoto

but first we grill

😱8🔥4custom 593617585000834989021

2 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC334 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

TARDO, TISMO, GET THE FUGGIN FORGLIFD stop spraying around!

🤣7custom 59361758500083498905

15 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC637 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @peeperupdatesPhoto

Big Peeper Update ⚔️ Family Expeditions are here! Explore dungeons together, fight enemies, complete interactive mini-games and defeat the Root King. • Combat uses d20 attack checks, enemy Armor Class and d6 damage rolls. • Choose between Knight, Scout, Mage and Cleric. Team abilities protect, empower, heal or reveal paths for the whole family. • Prepare provisions from farm and three personal artifacts before enter

🔥10🥰75

16 May 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,850 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 59361758500083498902815🔥7🥰4

15 May 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,700 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 593617585000834989024😱7🔥52

14 May 2026, 14:55 UTC≈1,730 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 59361758500083498902510🥰9😍1

9 May 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,590 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sunnyphotosPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 593617585000834989023🔥1

20 Apr 2026, 07:16 UTC≈1,610 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sunnyphotosPhoto

https://gofund.me/fc7eff8b9 i hate to be here again; not fully out of my hole. i am very actively trying to transition to better work then my current job. i am currently employed by a company that has me working very long shifts and only paying me the wage of $400 which is a compensation to the lot rent i would pay to keep my house here. i hate to have to leave my job because its what i love doing ive been plowing a

custom 593617585000834989021🙏3

17 Apr 2026, 14:03 UTC≈3,300 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔫 Peeper

22custom 593617585000834989010❤‍🔥3

24 Mar 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,890 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😢16custom 59361758500083498901110🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Apusthetics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Apusthetics 🐸” (@Apusthetics), 1,439 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Apusthetics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.