Channel
@ArchiveVanchel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
25subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003130008896 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ArchiveVanchel |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 13 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ArchiveVanchel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 25 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:24 | 27 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 27 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 28 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 October 2025 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 401 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Sept 2026, 19:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
EH BENER TENTANG KASUS RESS YOONHO ITU ⁉️ GILA SIH OWNER NYA MASA NGASIH HARGA MURAH-MURAH GINI COY 🤕 SINI GWE SPILL HARGA" NYA ㅤ✶ STARS TELE START 3,6K ㅤ✶ NOKTEL 6K ㅤ✶ TELEPREM 51K ㅤ✶ CANVA 1B CUMA 300P ㅤ✶ CAPCUT 6,5K ㅤ✶ ALIGHT MOTION 1K ㅤ✶ NETFLIX START 2K DAN MASIH BANYAK LAGI YANG SUPER DUPER MURAH, KALAU KALIAH KEPO LANGSUNG CUSS JOIN AJAA ‼️ http://t.me/+3avLDcicTu83ZDI1 http://t.me/+3avLDcicTu83ZDI1 JOINED…
skai
Sticker, posted without a caption
waduh kakaa Kaka ini itu beneran rill kaah ada ress yang jual TELEPREM 52K, NETFLIX 2K AJA, DISNEY+ 1.5k, YOUTUBE 1.2k, VIU 200p, SPOTIFY 8K, APPMUS 3K, CANVA 250p, DAN BANYAK LAGI APP PREM MURAH LAINNYA?!?!? semurah ini 🤭🤭🤭 http://t.me/+3avLDcicTu83ZDI1 http://t.me/+3avLDcicTu83ZDI1 http://t.me/+3avLDcicTu83ZDI1 RESS YOONHO SOLUSINYA DIJAMIN AMAN + NYAMAN + FAST RESPONN DAN YANG TERPENTING ANTI #SCAM 🥵🥵🥵😱 SI PALI…
👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻
HAI HAI ADA KABAR GONG NIH😳 KALIAN TAU GAK RESS YOONHO? YAA ITU RESS TRUSTED POLL LAGI NGADAIN PROMO SPESIAL VALENTINE LOHH🌟 SINI AKU SPIL DIKIT 1b netflix 1u1p : 25k 1b netflix 2u1p : 22k 1b netflix semipriv : 28k 1b youtube famplan : 800p 1b dramabox sharing : 7.5k 1y alight motion private : 1k (acc s) 1b capcut private : 7.5k 1b capcut sharing : 5.5k 7d capcut private : 3k 1b canva member : 250p 1b canva admin : …
Sticker, posted without a caption
💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 💎💎💎💎💎💎
ARCHIVE RESS YOONHO pinned «LITERASI INI‼️ - ga ngirim proof login & tidak mengisi rank selama 48j = nogar gak lakuin salah satu? nogar ttp cuapek ingetin. Kalo bisa membaca pasti tau di taroh di mana ss login, yg oot taro di cs proof garansi = nogar bukan gamau ingetin di rc lagi…»
KALIAN TAU?? ... RESS YOONHO YANG KATANYA TRUSTED? katanya ress trusted tapi ko ini TRUSTED BANGET? masa pricenya STRAT 50P DOANG cuma di RESS YOONHO 😮💨 https://t.me/+3avLDcicTu83ZDI1 https://t.me/+3avLDcicTu83ZDI1 MURCE 💯 mana yang katanya mau jajan? dikasih yang murmer gini yakali engga diambil 🤭🤭 sipaling suka stalk cek 500+ testi (&') trx tapi inget" melihat berarti membeli 🤪
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤ🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠⭐️ ㅤㅤ 🤩 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 POKONYA ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ DEH!! pelayanan di sini recomend banget, admin nya ramah & amanah/trusted, fast respon, proses cepet. Pokoknya trusted poll! Wajib banget sih buat jajan disini pasti ketagihan!!! ♾/10! SUKA BANGET SAMA PELAYANAN admin nya, walaupun harga nya murah tapi proses sat set, fast respon && trusted banget!! pokoknya engga salah sih pilih di ress ini♥️
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ArchiveVanchel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ARCHIVE RESS YOONHO” (@ArchiveVanchel), 25 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArchiveVanchel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.