رح ننشر مشاهد الإعدام لكل صحفي بشكل منفرد لاحقاً بعد انتهاء السلسلة.
😢5❤3

Channel
@Archive_syr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
8,289subscribers
+6,807 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003711961731 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Archive_syr |
| Description | هنا الذاكرة الحية.. رحلة التاريخ السوري وحكايا الوطن عبر الزمن بالحقيقة الثاقبة والثابتة. القناة مخصصة للأعلان عن التحديثات المضافة إلى البوت @SyrArchive_bot |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Archive_syr |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:36 | 8,289 | +64 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 8,225 | +326 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:01 | 7,899 | +140 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:49 | 7,759 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:34 | 7,757 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 7,761 | +14 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 7,747 | +40 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 7,707 | +67 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 7,640 | +112 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 7,528 | +2,255 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 5,273 | +1,526 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 3,747 | +1,335 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 2,412 | +128 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 2,284 | +28 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 2,256 | +58 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 2,198 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:28 | 2,198 | +177 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 2,021 | +33 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 1,988 | +125 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 1,863 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (31 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 30,136 |
| Reactions total | 303 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 23:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
445 reactions across 36 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 264 | 59.3% | |
| 💔 | 75 | 16.9% | |
| 😢 | 31 | 6.97% | |
| 🫡 | 31 | 6.97% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 4.27% | |
| 🤣 | 19 | 4.27% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 445 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (21.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
رح ننشر مشاهد الإعدام لكل صحفي بشكل منفرد لاحقاً بعد انتهاء السلسلة.
😢5❤3
«وحي الشيطان» | الصحفي الثالث: محمود شعبان الحاج خضر في الحلقة الثالثة من هذه السلسلة التوثيقية، نسلّط الضوء على الصحفي محمود شعبان الحاج خضر، الذي كان مسؤولاً عن إذاعة «الآن FM» في مدينة دير الزور، ضمن المنطقة التي أطلق عليها تنظيم الدولة الإسلامية تسمية «ولاية الخير». كان محمود يتولى مسؤولية الإذاعة، ويعمل في المجال الإعلامي، قبل أن يصبح هدفاً لجهاز أمن تنظيم الدولة الإسلامية. وتعود تفاصيل اعتقاله إلى اليوم الذ…
💔4😢2❤1👏1
نستعرض اليوم سلسلة توثيقية ترصد الانتهاكات الإسرائيلية بحق سوريا خلال عام 1965، من خلال توثيق كل انتهاك على حدة، وفق التسلسل الزمني للأحداث، من الأقدم إلى الأحدث، استنادًا إلى الوثائق والمصادر العسكرية. الانتهاك رقم 3 | Today, we present a documentary series chronicling Israeli violations against Syria during 1965. Each incident is documented individually in chronological order, from the earliest to the most recent…
😢3❤1
لا تقتصر قيمة ما ينشره الأرشيف السوري على كونه صوراً أو مقاطع فيديو أو تسجيلات صوتية نادرة، بل تتجاوز ذلك ليكون جزءاً من الذاكرة الرقمية والتاريخية التي باتت مهددة بالاختفاء أو النسيان. فالآثار الرقمية هي مواد بصرية وسمعية حُذفت من منصات التواصل الاجتماعي والمواقع الإلكترونية، أو حُجبت وأصبحت خارج نطاق الوصول عبر محركات البحث، حتى غدت نادرة أو يصعب العثور عليها، ولم تعد متاحة إلا من خلال نسخ محدودة محفوظة على أقراص …
❤12🫡1
«وحي الشيطان» | الصحفي الثاني: سامي جودت رباح حين تحوّل جهاز الحاسوب من أداة لنقل الحقيقة إلى وسيلة لاستهداف صاحبها! في الحلقة الثانية من هذه السلسلة التوثيقية، نسلّط الضوء على الصحفي سامي جودت رباح، ابن مدينة دير الزور، الذي لم يتجاوز عمره 28 عاماً، وانتهت حياته في جريمة ارتكبها تنظيم الدولة الإسلامية، بعدما أقدم التنظيم على تفخيخ جهاز الحاسوب الخاص به ونسفه. لم يكن الحاسوب بالنسبة لسامي مجرد جهاز للعمل، بل كان أ…
💔7❤3😢2👏1
نستعرض اليوم سلسلة توثيقية ترصد الانتهاكات الإسرائيلية بحق سوريا خلال عام 1965، من خلال توثيق كل انتهاك على حدة، وفق التسلسل الزمني للأحداث، من الأقدم إلى الأحدث، استنادًا إلى الوثائق والمصادر العسكرية. الانتهاك رقم 2 | Today, we present a documentary series chronicling Israeli violations against Syria during 1965. Each incident is documented individually in chronological order, from the earliest to the most recent…
❤4😢4
سنقوم اليوم بنشر الفيديو الخاص بالإعلامي سامي جودت رباح يذكر ان التنظيم قام بتفخيخ جهاز الحاسوب الخاص ب سامي وقام بنسفه به داخل شقته وهو مقيد على الطاولة لا نتبنى محتوى التنظيم ولا نقوم بالترويج له. نضع المواد لتوثيق التاريخ وحفظه ولفتح باب الإطلاع عليه لمن لم يشاهد ما جرى ضمن سنوات الحرب السورية.
💔5😢3👍1
«وحي الشيطان» | الصحفي الأول: سامر محمد عبود حين أصبح القلم تهمة، والصورة جريمة، والكاميرا سبباً للإعدام! في أولى حلقات هذه السلسلة التوثيقية، نسلّط الضوء على الصحفي سامر محمد عبود، أحد الصحفيين الخمسة الذين وثّق إصدار «وحي الشيطان» الدعائي التابع لتنظيم الدولة الإسلامية جريمة إعدامهم، تحت ذريعة التجسس. لم يكن الصحفيون مجرد أسماء وردت في إصدار مرئي لتنظيم إرهابي، بل كانوا من العاملين في المجال الإعلامي، الذين طالت…
💔9👍2
نستعرض اليوم سلسلة توثيقية ترصد الانتهاكات الإسرائيلية بحق سوريا خلال عام 1965، من خلال توثيق كل انتهاك على حدة، وفق التسلسل الزمني للأحداث، من الأقدم إلى الأحدث، استنادًا إلى الوثائق والمصادر العسكرية. الانتهاك رقم 1 | Today, we present a documentary series chronicling Israeli violations against Syria during 1965. Each incident is documented individually in chronological order, from the earliest to the most recent…
💔6❤1
سنقوم اليوم بنشر الفيديو الخاص بالإعلامي سامر محمد عبود من وثائقي وحي الشيطان ويتضمن اعترافات سامر بحسب التنظيم وصولاً إلى عملية إعدامه. لا نتبنى محتوى التنظيم ولا نقوم بالترويج له. نضع المواد لتوثيق التاريخ وحفظه ولفتح باب الإطلاع عليه لمن لم يشاهد ما جرى ضمن سنوات الحرب السورية بعيداً عن التأويل والقيل والقال.
🫡5👏3💔2
انتهينا بعون الله من توثيق الانتهاكات الإسرائيلية على الأراضي السورية عام 1964 بمجموع 21 انتهاك موثق باليوم والساعة والحدث. ونبدأ اليوم بسلسلة جديدة تتضمن توثيق الأنتهاكات الإسرائيلية لعام 1965.
❤10
والان كأرشيف قمنا بتغطية الأمرين لا يمكن التباكي على كمين العتيبة بحق عناصر جبهة النصرة وأستخدامه شماعة لأهداف سياسية او للترويج لمظلومية ما وتجاهل كمين جبهة النصرة بحق الجيش العربي السوري. وبالنهاية رحم الله جميع الشهداء من كل الأطراف.
❤16🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @Archive_syr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Archive_syr edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الأرشيف السوري Archive syr” (@Archive_syr), 8,289 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Archive_syr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.