6 measurements spanning 12 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,835–4,897 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 03:59
4,842
-17
4 Sept 2026, 16:00
4,859
-17
1 Sept 2026, 12:24
4,876
-9
29 Aug 2026, 19:28
4,885
-5
29 Aug 2026, 01:00
4,890
no change
29 Aug 2026, 00:45
4,890
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.54%
avg views ÷ 4,842 subscribers
Avg views / post
220
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
45.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
20 (14 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
4,395
Reactions total
2,000
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,000 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
633
31.6%
❤🔥
430
21.5%
🔥
252
12.6%
🤩
184
9.20%
😍
158
7.90%
👍
99
4.95%
🕊
98
4.90%
🥰
42
2.10%
🦄
42
2.10%
👏
33
1.65%
💘
14
0.7%
⚡
8
0.4%
💔
7
0.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,000 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
как 200 страниц могут растопить душу
Как же это было мило! Не знаю, как автору это удаётся, но новелла на 200 страниц, а в героев успеваешь влюбиться по уши.
Казалось бы, действие происходит в детском доме, у каждого персонажа за плечами своя грустная история, свои шрамы и боль. Но от книги веет не безысходностью, а настоящим волшебством. Тёплой, уютной магией, которая согревает изнутри. Читаешь и улыбаешься — наст…
Сегодня открылся предзаказ на книгу
Светланы Тюльбашевой, «Проклятая земля». Впервые делимся обложкой.
В мистическом триллере писательница разворачивает действие в загадочной деревушке. Молодая семья покупает землю в Тверской области, чтобы открыть глэмпинг. А неподалеку стоит заброшенная усадьба, о которой местные предпочитают не говорить.
Современная семейная драма соединяется с захватывающей мистической историей …
атмосфера — 10 из 10, герои — мимо
Вайб этой истории — просто песня. Такая лёгкая, летняя, воздушная, пропитанная солнцем и морским бризом. Читается на одном дыхании, хочется самой оказаться в этом месте. Ну просто идеальный книжный отпуск!
Однако с героями мне совсем не повезло. Как-то всё по верхам, без глубины. Персонажи будто нарисованы тонкой кисточкой: вроде и красиво, но не чувствуешь их по-настоящему. Имхо!…
Пока мы все полны сил и энергии, заряжены летним солнцем и витамином D3, предлагаем вам нашу книжную подборку которую мы собрали для вас в честь недели популяризации спорта🏅🏃🏽♀️🏄♂️
Шикарное издание для первого знакомства детей с библейскими сюжетами.
Текст написан живым, доступным языком, без излишней сложности, но с сохранением смысловой глубины.
Оформление книги заслуживает отдельной похвалы. На каждом разворот—яркие иллюстрации итальянского художника Фабиано Фиорина. Рисунки динамичные, живые и точно соответствуют возрасту целевой аудитории: они привлекают внимание, но не перегружают воспри…
Куда пропал Жестокий принц?
К этой истории я возвращалась с трепетом. Соскучилась по этому миру, по Приске, по Лориану и компании. Первая часть книги пролетела незаметно — а я всё ждала чего-то грандиозного...
Однако ближе к финалу меня накрыла усталость от бесконечных скитаний. Герои постоянно куда-то идут, преодолевают препятствия, но это движение перестало быть захватывающим. Оно стало механическим: они идут на …
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤🔥37❤35🕊35🦄17
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Arg_Nova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
«Доктор Живаго» — это роман о враче, который пишет стихи.
Да73%
Нет27%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Воображаю себя блогером” (@Arg_Nova), 4,842 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Arg_Nova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
