Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net +322. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,051–5,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 07:20
5,473
-14
13 Sept 2026, 10:18
5,487
-7
9 Sept 2026, 21:36
5,494
+34
4 Sept 2026, 15:41
5,460
+28
1 Sept 2026, 08:49
5,432
+46
29 Aug 2026, 17:57
5,386
+48
26 Aug 2026, 22:03
5,338
+82
24 Aug 2026, 02:02
5,256
+147
20 Aug 2026, 11:44
5,109
-12
17 Aug 2026, 12:03
5,121
-5
13 Aug 2026, 14:49
5,126
-6
10 Aug 2026, 17:12
5,132
-15
7 Aug 2026, 21:38
5,147
-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:01
5,151
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:55
5,151
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 31s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
515 reactions across 31 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
109
21.2%
👍
54
10.5%
😁
43
8.35%
🤣
40
7.77%
custom 5426960077808501288
37
7.18%
❤
30
5.83%
custom 5427364294360595357
27
5.24%
🤯
23
4.47%
custom 5427229483927109822
14
2.72%
custom 5424616730766898372
13
2.52%
custom 5425088240866590969
12
2.33%
custom 5427396094298453727
12
2.33%
custom 5424881897752786832
10
1.94%
⚡
9
1.75%
😱
8
1.55%
custom 5377514056359902050
7
1.36%
👏
7
1.36%
custom 5424735048525971459
6
1.17%
custom 5427175148295845261
6
1.17%
custom 5429248109966293013
6
1.17%
13 further kinds
42
8.16%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 515 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 31 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Artemon52_Z. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💙 ДИНАМО БРЯНСК | КАНЧЕЛЬСКИС, БОЛЕЛЬЩИКИ, ВТОРАЯ ЛИГА
Новый выпуск Шоу «В Ауте» о Брянском Футболе — уже на нашем канале! 📱
В этот раз я приехал на первый домашний матч «Динамо» Брянск в новом сезоне Второй лиги А и весь матч общался с болельщиками.
Поговорили про Андрея Канчельскиса, перспективы команды, стадион, возможный выход в Первую лигу и будущее брянского футбола.
Ставьте лайк, пишите комментарий и подпи…
⚡️💙 72-летний депутат выйдет в стартовом составе «Динамо» на матч Кубка России!
Михаил Барышников, депутат Законодательного собрания Санкт-Петербурга, выйдет с капитанской повязкой в матче Пути регионов против ФК «10» из WINLINE Медиалиги.
Таким образом, Барышников станет самым возрастным футболистом в истории Кубка России. Он побьёт рекорд экс-главы «Зенита» Медведева, который сыграл за «Амкал» в 70 лет.
➡️ Подпи…
😮 «Велес» одержал четвёртую победу в сезоне, «Ротор» тоже старается не отставать
🩵💙 Два выходца из Второй лиги сразились между собой: в итоге непростая игра получилась, но «Велес» всё же одержал четвёртую победу. Банда Стукалова — вторая в Лиге PARI! (2:1).
💙🩵 «Ротор» воткнул «Челябинску» уже три гола в первом тайме, ответ последовал лишь однажды. Волгоградцы замыкают ТОП-5. (4:1).
➡️ Подпишись на Шувалов о Первой…
😢 Снова без победы «КАМАЗА»
Челнинцы пропустили уже на 2-й минуте. Всё решилось во втором тайме, где сильнее оказалась «Волга». Непростая победа.
➡️ Подпишись на Шувалов о Первой Лиге | ФНЛ, ФНЛ 2
😱 «Шинник» скатал ничейку с «Арсеналом», а «Торпедо» проигрывает второй тур подряд
💙🧡 Азявин кинул ответку бывшим, но этого не хватило. «Арсенал» собрался во втором тайме и за две минуты сравнял счёт. В итоге результативная ничья. (2:2).
🖤 «Торпедо» уступает второй тур подряд. «Сочи» в свою очередь налаживает дела с очками. (1:2)
➡️ Подпишись на Шувалов о Первой Лиге | ФНЛ, ФНЛ 2
❤️ Увидели аут иранца, гол Калмыкова и победу Костромского «Спартака».
Идеальное начало «воскресенья» в Лиге PARI! «СКА» безумно жаль — (0 очков).
➡️ Подпишись на Шувалов о Первой Лиге | ФНЛ, ФНЛ 2
😳 ФАНТАСТИКА! Я НЕ ВЕРЮ СВОИМ ГЛАЗАМ 🔥
Гол: Сергей Бугриёв
Голевая: Надер Мохаммади
Такие голевые, теперь только в Лигe PARI!
➡️ Подпишись на Шувалов о Первой Лиге | ФНЛ, ФНЛ 2
😱 «Нижний Новгород» громит «Нефтехимик», «Уфа» без Тетрадзе тоже влетела
💙💚 Грулёв уже к 21-й минуте оформил для «Нижнего» пятую победу в сезоне. Пополитов и Гудков лишь добили «Нефтехимик». (5:1).
🧡🩵 «Урал» разгромил «Уфу» без Тетрадзе, Юсупова и Щербаченко. Скоропупов забил свой первый мяч за основу — ещё одна победа Юрана. (3:0).
➡️ Подпишись на Шувалов о Первой Лиге | ФНЛ, ФНЛ 2
Ждём невъебического контента на протяжении всего матча — и только фанатского сектора! 🔥
Ну и в конце — подарок Канчельскису. На этом всё, расходимся 💪
➡️ Подпишись на Шувалов о Первой Лиге | ФНЛ, ФНЛ 2
🤣12😁7🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @Artemon52_Z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шувалов о Первой Лиге | ФНЛ, ФНЛ 2” (@Artemon52_Z), 5,473 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Artemon52_Z.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.