Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АСАД БАГИРОВ Человек слова. Публичные выступления, ораторское мастерство, продажи со сцены, психология

Channel

АСАД БАГИРОВ Человек слова. Публичные выступления, ораторское мастерство, продажи со сцены, психология

@AsadBagirov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,173subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001388909732
TypeChannel
Username@AsadBagirov
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AsadBagirov

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1611,1731,1677 August 2026 — 1,166 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,166 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,167 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,168 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,169 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,161 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,166 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,167 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,173 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 43 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,159–1,175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 02:391,173+6
14 Sept 2026, 10:181,167+1
10 Sept 2026, 14:011,166+5
1 Sept 2026, 18:131,161-8
26 Aug 2026, 18:071,169+1
24 Aug 2026, 00:471,168+1
10 Aug 2026, 12:451,167+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:201,166no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:161,166first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3331.4%
🔥2120.0%
👍1514.3%
😁98.57%
🙏98.57%
💯76.67%
32.86%
21.90%
🏆21.90%
🤔21.90%
👏10.952%
🤝10.952%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AsadBagirov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Прошло две недели с момента старта программы группового наставничества «Мастер влияния». Некоторые результаты участников: - получила нужный контакт человека из правительства - получила проценты за продажу, хотя до этого даже не знала как назвать цену - в поликлинике тесть получил нужное назначение к нужному врачу и без копейки денег - взлетел рилз на 250 тысяч просмотров, хотя уже долго не залетали. А еще внутренн

111🔥1🙏1

3 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Эффект «правила трёх» Всё, что больше трёх, для мозга шум. Всё, что три и меньше, сигнал. Почему тройка — это магия: Три создаёт ритм. Три даёт завершённость. Три легко повторить. А значит, вашу идею перескажут другим. Как перевести любой список в тройку: ❌Было: «Наш курс поможет улучшить дикцию, убрать зажимы, поставить дыхание, развить харизму, работать со взглядом... ✅Стало: «Вы зазвучите увереннее. Зал начнё

👍31🔥1🤔1🙏1

1 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC92 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Меланхолии пост Первый день последнего месяца лета. Он всегда ассоциировался у меня с грустью. Ведь август он вроде и летний месяц, но дни чуть короче, ночи длиннее, и уже не так жарко. Но самое главное, за ним нет другого летнего месяца. Сразу, без прелюдий, школа. Прелюдия в августе. Уже чаще мелькают те, кто уезжал в лагеря или на юга (хотя южнее моей республики в Союзе не было). Уже нужно идти получать учебники.

6👍21🔥1🤔1🙏1

30 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC92 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если вы хотите, чтобы ваше выступление забыли уже через 5 минут, то не читайте этот пост. До конца. Почему некоторые выступления забываются почти сразу? Был нарушен баланс: - у выступления не было каркаса. Оно было живым, но бесформенным. Как желе. - наоборот. Сухое, схематичное. Как инструкция к пылесосу. Всё по делу, но скучно до зевоты. Это выступление с каркасом, но без кожи. В чём разница: Каркас — это логика

🔥21👍1🙏1

30 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC91 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ха, вражеский фейсбук показал дружественную картину: мой первый тренинг по ораторскому искусству. Я студент. Как сейчас помню, это было на проспекте Мира. Тренинг платный, состав смешанный, однокурсники плюс люди со стороны. Именно сторонний участник, узнав, что это мой дебют, чуть не выпал в осадок: «Если это первый, боюсь представить, какие будут последующие!» Как в воду глядел. Краткая зарисовка: До начала тренин

2👍2😁2💯1🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC100 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вспышки на Солнце? Как вы думаете, в этом есть какой-то смысл? Поделитесь в комментариях

🔥3😁2

28 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC103 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Беззастенчиво делюсь результатами участников группового наставничества «Мастер влияния». Страна должна знать своих героев и гордиться ими. Это я не про себя. Хотя…

2🏆1👍1🔥1🤝1

28 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC112 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

С трудом, но у меня получилось пост- визитку дооформить. Но это ужас, ссылки не вставляются, или предложения не редактируются. В общем, с тг не соскучишься☝️

👏1💯1🔥1😁1

28 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTCviews —

АСАД БАГИРОВ Человек слова. Публичные выступления, ораторское мастерство, продажи со сцены, психология pinned a photo

28 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC103 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‼️Давайте знакомиться Меня зовут Асад Багиров. Я — наставник по публичным выступлениям, ораторскому искусству и продающим коммуникациям Я помогаю экспертам помогающих профессий, лидерам, предпринимателям и представителям бизнеса превратить их знания и опыт в уверенную, влиятельную речь, которая убеждает и продает. 🔥 Спикер - наставник и член Ассоциации спикеров СНГ (CISSA) Радислава Гандапаса ⠀ 🔥 Топ-5 русскоязычн

4🔥3👍2🏆1💯1

27 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC87 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я как писатель кончился. И начался теперь как продвиженец. Это другая роль, если угодно, субличность. И даже, другая личность. И есть две стратегии: сидеть и ждать, когда меня великого заметят и пригласят, и другая, создать эту возможность самому. Создать условия для этой возможности. Первая про инфантилизм и розовые слоники, (и жертвы тоже, кстати). Вторая про взрослость, читай, проактивность, лидерство, уверенност

3💯1🔥1🙏1

25 Jul 2026, 11:37 UTC110 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Импровизация и креативность в речи. Что, где, почем? Спонтанная речь. Умение рождать мысль в моменте, опираясь на контекст. Мышление. Тренировка спонтанной речи развивает нейронные связи. Бизнес. С новым нейроузором мозг начинает быстрее находить решения и в бизнесе Переговоры. Партнёр выдвинул условие, которого не было в договоре. Вместо «я не знаю» вы выдаёте вариант. Потому что ваш мозг привык искать, а не зави

🔥21🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @AsadBagirov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Полина Сухова. Переход в 5 D Измерение.
@Transitiontothe5D · 41,633
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АСАД БАГИРОВ Человек слова. Публичные выступления, ораторское мастерство, продажи со сцены, психология” (@AsadBagirov), 1,173 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AsadBagirov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.