Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 33 days, net +104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,404–10,540 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 19:18
10,524
+8
6 Sept 2026, 12:58
10,516
+4
2 Sept 2026, 21:37
10,512
-1
1 Sept 2026, 19:54
10,513
+7
31 Aug 2026, 20:18
10,506
+8
30 Aug 2026, 17:14
10,498
+6
29 Aug 2026, 20:04
10,492
+2
28 Aug 2026, 19:02
10,490
+11
27 Aug 2026, 18:08
10,479
-3
26 Aug 2026, 19:23
10,482
+3
24 Aug 2026, 19:13
10,479
+7
23 Aug 2026, 06:23
10,472
+9
21 Aug 2026, 19:19
10,463
+13
20 Aug 2026, 14:25
10,450
+11
19 Aug 2026, 17:12
10,439
-5
18 Aug 2026, 18:34
10,444
+6
17 Aug 2026, 18:14
10,438
+4
16 Aug 2026, 17:14
10,434
-4
15 Aug 2026, 00:45
10,438
+9
13 Aug 2026, 17:47
10,429
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 10,524 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,360
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
26 (29 April 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
14,180
Reactions total
217
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,134 reactions across 26 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
577
50.9%
🤣
155
13.7%
🔥
139
12.3%
❤🔥
65
5.73%
👍
49
4.32%
🦄
29
2.56%
🥰
21
1.85%
💯
18
1.59%
😱
14
1.23%
🙏
12
1.06%
🤓
12
1.06%
custom 5390950002551954897
11
0.97%
🐳
11
0.97%
🎉
8
0.705%
🤩
8
0.705%
💋
3
0.265%
🌭
2
0.176%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,134 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 26 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AuroraWeb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 April 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😊 2-го свидания не будет, зато он теперь знает...
Сборная солянка историй, которые модели успевают рассказать мемберу до того, как он уйдет, больше никогда не вернувшись. Зато было весело.
😬 Второго привата не будет, но теперь он знает...
➕ как ты познакомилась со своим бывшим в 2017 году (и почему вы расстались)
➕ почему ты ненавидишь оливки
➕ историю болезни твоего кота
➕ что твоя мама думает о твоей работе
➕ поче…
Hа связи DreamWork ❤️
Ищем админа в ночную смену (23:00-7:30)
Порекомендуй нас той, кто ищет работу и мы заплатим 20к за успешное собеседование
📍Санкт-Петербург, м. Звенигородская
Что мы предлагаем:
🍋 4-5 смен в неделю
🍋 ЗП от 110к в месяц с еженедельными выплатами
🍋 оплачиваемая стажировка
🍋 оплата английского и спорта
Кого мы ищем:
🌸 девушка 22+
🌸 опыт работы в вебкаме от 1 года
🌸 английский не ниже B1
🌸 поним…
⭐️Почему одни модели медийные, а другие — нет?
Что за "медийность", за которой все гонятся? Нужна ли она тебе? И почему одни модели запоминаются, а других вечная текучка?
🍋 Медийность можно заменить словами "узнаваемость" или "запоминаемость", которые конвертируются напрямую в доход. Второе значение "медийности" исходит из частоты упоминания человека или бренда, но не будь запоминаемости, упоминания не были бы эффек…
$1233 за смену на Chaturbate и MyFreeCams это реальность
КАК? Здесь разбор: что делали и что повлияло 👉 Кейс целиком
Угадай Кит или фрилоудер? - он сидит в твоей комнате каждый день.. тратит время или же присматривается перед вложением? Проверь себя за 30 секунд.
Скоро в канале - разборы моделей-подписчиц, по шагам: где именно теряются деньги и как начать их зарабатывать. Подпишись. 👇
〰️〰️Вебкам как игра, в которой никто не объяснил правила.
Тут нет туториала, а NPC-админ, который выдаст стартовый квест, не может повлиять на мобов, которых ты встретишь. Все самые важные правила узнаются опытным путём после первого проигрыша или серьезного левел-апа.
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🔅 Правило №1
Качество мемберов всегда важнее их количества.
❤️ Правило №2
Если стало тихо — говори первой.
🌸 Правило №3
Никогда не ста…
🐈 Если бы все, что мешает зарабатывать больше, можно было просто смахнуть со стола...
Что бы улетело первым?
Не хватает усидчивости?
Мотивации?
Английского?
Уверенности?
Или причина совсем другая?
Пиши в комментариях ЧЕСТНО:
что сейчас сильнее всего мешает тебе зарабатывать столько, сколько хочется?
👇 Очень интересно почитать ваши ответы.
💬 чат — https://t.me/+x8flAQr7llI3Mzc8
5 идей для монолога во фри-чате.
Универсальные темы, которые можно держать в течение стрима, и которые не оставят мемберов молчунами.
🤩 "У меня есть теория..."
Всем всегда хочется высказать свое мнение.
*Например:
🎈почему кошки считают себя хозяевами дома
🎈почему люди покупают странные вещи
🎈почему самые вкусные продукты вредные
*Конспирологические теории сюда же. Естественно, не используя скандалы, где речь касает…
👉Если кажется, что ты делаешь всё правильно, а денег всё равно мало - скорее всего, проблема не в мемберах.
Проблема в том, что ты не видишь, где именно теряешь деньги.
Одни модели месяцами ищут новый образ или винят алгоритмы. Другие находят одну ошибку - и доход меняется за недели.
В ВебТренерской об этом без воды:
↘️ самая дорогая ошибка, которую совершают модели каждый день - [читать]
↘️ момент, когда нормальн…
🪙 Как взять контроль над финансами за один вечер?
Нестабильный доход мешает вести бюджет аккуратно, импульсивные траты создают хаос. Часто проблема не в низких заработках, а в отсутствии контроля над ними. Есть несколько простых способов, как привести финансы в порядок. Реально работает!
💵 Найди денежную дыру.
С помощью анализа трат в приложении банка смотрим, куда уходят деньги. Маркетплейсы, такси, доставки — здор…
Привет. Дружелюбно выходим к вам, чтобы спросить - есть желающие ловить китов с нами? 🤩 А именно, на вакансии чаттеров и контент-менеджеров.
Планируем потихоньку начать набор моделей в августе. И хотели бы предупредить, что работа рассчитана, по крайней мере на этом этапе, с начинающими аккаунтами. То есть с криейтерами-новичками, которые с нуля хотят запустить карьеру на контент-сайтах.
Поэтому работы планируется …
〰 Стрём или норм? Мемберы Edition.
Ранее: Cтрём или норм? - Вебкам Edition; - Модели Edition
Сталкивалась с таким и считаешь, что это не норм? Или все-таки можно вписать в рамки нормальности? Пиши в комментах.
〰 Мембер говорит "Тише, моя жена спит в соседней комнате".
🗓️ Постоянник торгуется, типа сейчас туго с деньгами.
〰 Просит выйти в твой выходной без доплаты, "и так доп. денюжка".
🗓️ Подарил игрушку и тепер…
❤22🎉8🔥8🌭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @AuroraWeb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
НЕДЕТСКИЙ АНГЛИЙСКИЙ @unchildish_english · 42,037 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MANYTIPS про вебкам” (@AuroraWeb), 10,524 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AuroraWeb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.