Sticker, posted without a caption
🤣9❤3

Channel
@Awakeningpignewspaper
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,831subscribers
-91 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001726864569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Awakeningpignewspaper |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Awakeningpignewspaper |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 4,831 | -10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 4,841 | -9 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 4,850 | -13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 4,863 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 4,862 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 4,867 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 4,874 | -11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 4,885 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 4,893 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 4,898 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 4,907 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:10 | 4,919 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 4,922 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
154 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 35 | 22.7% | |
| 🤣 | 34 | 22.1% | |
| ❤ | 31 | 20.1% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 7.14% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 7.14% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 5.19% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 3.90% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 3.90% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.60% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 1.30% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤣9❤3
海綿無聊的說說🍌 哈囉大家好嗎?只是問候。 因為沒有開放留言,但可以以表情回應 #海綿 #只是關心
👏17❤3🍌1👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
😭8🤝1🤣1
海綿最後的告白我們都是值得也值得的 我想我應該告個段落了,已經預告太久了,我知道很多人不捨,之所以拖那麼久,就是慢慢的離開,估計顧慮的太多 反正很好笑,我不再關注其他事物,只關注自己,我發現我越來越好了哈 就是大議題也只是分心罷了,我以為我能改變什麼,不,先改變自己而已 我希望我們自己在這破世界堅強而偉大 感謝各位支持過這頻道也感謝大家愛我 #海綿 #最後的一封信 #晚安 #永遠的豬豬俠 #豬豬俠的精神
❤19👍2
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤣2❤1
每給個覺醒的人勉勵撐過去了就是開悟 覺醒是不斷學習的階段,突破各種議題和矩陣,開悟就是能把一切都連結起來 #覺醒 #開悟 #把自己過好
👏8
Sticker, posted without a caption
🥴3
物價講了好幾年現在更多人受不鳥了 能想像嗎,台灣很多不合理,連颱風都可以作假操控菜價,別忘了果菜市場源頭是政府,例如北農,很多時候根本沒颱風,但物價卻上漲一批,這政府到處吸老百姓的血,實在很可悲,問問台灣人,他們只是說這哪有什麼辦法。所以台灣人根本沒法改變什麼,什麼破民主都是假的,台灣人4百多年來從來沒有真正做主過,還在相信政客的謊言嗎? #台灣 #物價 #可笑 #假民主
🤬6😨1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤣3
笑死美國人做的唐納德的衣服真好笑 #唐 #唐寶寶 #唐納德 #美國 #喜憨總統
😁3
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤4
當發現世界是虛擬的耶和華是假的,你才能真正意義上的作主,嗯這個很哲 正義女神被矇住了雙眼,我們以為的正義只是我們自己以為的而已,凡蒂岡更是早就宣布這個世界的上帝叫路西法 這裡就是地獄,哎,我們才是自己的神 別期待任何人了,把自己過好才是王道 #神 #自己 #意識 #開悟 #覺醒
🤯5💊2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Awakeningpignewspaper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Q報時事、香蕉哲學、豬豬俠” (@Awakeningpignewspaper), 4,831 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Awakeningpignewspaper.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.