Channel
@Awraq_Alyasmin
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
84,290subscribers
-1,550 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001017582915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Awraq_Alyasmin |
| Created | 10 January 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Awraq_Alyasmin |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “💌 أوراق⚘الياسـمـين 💌” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:35 | 84,290 | -47 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 84,337 | -10 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:15 | 84,347 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:00 | 84,357 | -33 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 84,390 | -29 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 02:20 | 84,419 | -17 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 84,436 | -13 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 08:50 | 84,449 | -9 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:54 | 84,458 | -56 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 84,514 | -109 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 84,623 | -97 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 03:41 | 84,720 | -210 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 84,930 | -131 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 85,061 | -57 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 85,118 | -32 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 85,150 | -63 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 85,213 | +12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:54 | 85,201 | -79 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 85,280 | -28 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 85,308 | first reading |
991 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 171 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 159 of 335 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 991 (3 August 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 342,133 |
| Reactions total | 2,520 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Oct 2026, 03:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,570 reactions across 494 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4,711 | 62.2% | |
| 🍓 | 1,352 | 17.9% | |
| 💯 | 1,311 | 17.3% | |
| 🤝 | 112 | 1.48% | |
| 🏆 | 67 | 0.885% | |
| ✍ | 17 | 0.225% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 506 of the 991 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,728 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 991 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📖 حفظ قرآن + تجويد بطريقة سهلة انضم وابدأ رحلتك 👇 t.me/addlist/MwVvoBqMdRUyOWI8 🎯 اتعلم النطق الصحيح خطوة بخطوة ابدأ من هنا الآن🔽 t.me/addlist/MwVvoBqMdRUyOWI8 🚀 برنامج بسيط يساعدك تثبت وتحفظ متفوّتش الفرصة 👇 http://t.me/addlist/MwVvoBqMdRUyOWI8 ✨سُنّة يسيرة…لكنها تُذكّر القلب أن...👇 t.me/sokoon012/23823
Signed دعم Ɲûﾅêℓℓᵃ المسائي 20k
📖مجانا تصحيح التلاوة وإتقانها. 🎙️ ضبط المخارج والصفات وأحكام التجويد عمليًا.👇🏻 t.me/AleayidunElaAllah/36724 🥗سلسله السلطات الصحيه لخساره الوزن👇🏻 https://t.me/bhvbj/131809?single 📩 للدعم: @alfoursan55bot
Signed دعم Ɲûﾅêℓℓᵃ المسائي 20k
Photo, posted without a caption
الصدق أن تتطابق كلماتك مع أفعالك والحق أن تتطابق أفعالك مع ضميرك
🍓8
يَعتاد الإنسان على سَمعه وبَصره، وحَركةِ لسَانه، ومَشيهِ، فيَحسبها مُسلّمات، ويَنسى أنّها نِعم، فالحَمدُ لله على نِعم ألِفنَا وجُودها
🍓5💯3
🌊 إذا ضاق صدرك، فلا تعجل بالحكم على يومك؛ فكم من موجةٍ عالية أعقبها بحرٌ هادئ، وكم من شدةٍ تبعتها سكينة.
💯9
🕯️ قد لا تستطيع أن تُضيء العالم كله، لكن كلمةً طيبة قد تكون النور الذي كان ينتظره قلبٌ متعب.
💯9
🕰️ لم تتوقف الساعة لأنها مرت بلحظاتٍ صعبة، بل واصلت دورانها حتى أصبح ما كان يؤلمها مجرد ذكرى. وكذلك الحياة... استمر.
💯7
فأرضى بما قسم الله لك تعش اسعد الناس..
💯12
📱أجمل حالات قصيرة للواتس 💌⬇️ t.me/addlist/IH7j7yXleOI1ZDFk 📱واروع الصور للتليجرام ✅⬇️ t.me/addlist/IH7j7yXleOI1ZDFk 😍أحدث المقاطع المميزة🔽 t.me/addlist/IH7j7yXleOI1ZDFk ▫️ للإشتراك @Al_foursan ▫️
Signed الفُرسَان ⒛𝐤 { عصراً مثبتة }
🛑 أخطاء خفية قد تحبط طاعاتك دون أن تشعر، اكتشفها بنفسك عبر هذا الرابط👇🏼 https://t.me/fwayiid/20287 🥗 أفكار لأطعمة مناسبة للرجيم، ووصفات متنوعة تساعدك على تنظيم أكلك بطريقة أبسط 👇🏻 t.me/addlist/IH7j7yXleOI1ZDFk 💯للدعم @Al_foursan
Signed الفُرسَان ⒛𝐤 { عصراً مثبتة }
🌸🍃 وَبِـــــــك أَصبَحنَا وَالقُلُوب تَسألُكَ عَونًا وَتَرجُوكَ لُطفًا فَيَسِرَ لَنَا كُلَّ خَيرٍ يَا الله صباح الخَير ⛅️
👍9💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 991 posts we hold for @Awraq_Alyasmin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Awraq_Alyasmin edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 79 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 82 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚘ أوراق الياسمين⚘” (@Awraq_Alyasmin), 84,290 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Awraq_Alyasmin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.