Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ŸคŽโ˜•

Channel

๐ฅ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ŸคŽโ˜•

@Aya_2822

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

13,229subscribers

-915 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001840253717
TypeChannel
Username@Aya_2822
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Aya_2822

Topic

Personal blog โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,22914,14413,686.57 August 2026 โ€” 14,144 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 14,136 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 14,118 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 14,104 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 14,094 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 14,089 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 14,086 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 14,069 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 14,061 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 14,041 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 14,024 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 14,017 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 14,001 subscribers21 August 2026 โ€” 13,994 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 13,972 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 13,964 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 13,954 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 13,944 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 13,938 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 13,929 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 13,921 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 13,911 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 13,900 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 13,893 subscribers3 September 2026 โ€” 13,871 subscribers4 September 2026 โ€” 13,858 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 13,821 subscribers10 September 2026 โ€” 13,788 subscribers12 September 2026 โ€” 13,770 subscribers14 September 2026 โ€” 13,744 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 13,727 subscribers18 September 2026 โ€” 13,706 subscribers30 September 2026 โ€” 13,594 subscribers5 October 2026 โ€” 13,532 subscribers10 October 2026 โ€” 13,495 subscribers13 October 2026 โ€” 13,453 subscribers14 October 2026 โ€” 13,444 subscribers15 October 2026 โ€” 13,430 subscribers16 October 2026 โ€” 13,417 subscribers17 October 2026 โ€” 13,404 subscribers18 October 2026 โ€” 13,387 subscribers19 October 2026 โ€” 13,375 subscribers20 October 2026 โ€” 13,350 subscribers21 October 2026 โ€” 13,340 subscribers23 October 2026 โ€” 13,329 subscribers24 October 2026 โ€” 13,330 subscribers25 October 2026 โ€” 13,319 subscribers26 October 2026 โ€” 13,315 subscribers27 October 2026 โ€” 13,305 subscribers28 October 2026 โ€” 13,289 subscribers29 October 2026 โ€” 13,281 subscribers30 October 2026 โ€” 13,274 subscribers31 October 2026 โ€” 13,266 subscribers1 November 2026 โ€” 13,259 subscribers2 November 2026 โ€” 13,254 subscribers3 November 2026 โ€” 13,243 subscribers4 November 2026 โ€” 13,241 subscribers5 November 2026 โ€” 13,229 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 90 days, net -915. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 13,092โ€“14,281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 04:5813,229-12
4 Nov 2026, 03:5813,241-2
3 Nov 2026, 06:3813,243-11
2 Nov 2026, 05:0613,254-5
1 Nov 2026, 07:1513,259-7
31 Oct 2026, 06:1913,266-8
30 Oct 2026, 08:5413,274-7
29 Oct 2026, 05:2813,281-8
28 Oct 2026, 00:4813,289-16
27 Oct 2026, 00:1613,305-10
26 Oct 2026, 03:4613,315-4
25 Oct 2026, 03:1413,319-11
24 Oct 2026, 03:5713,330+1
23 Oct 2026, 02:5813,329-11
21 Oct 2026, 23:2813,340-10
20 Oct 2026, 19:5613,350-25
19 Oct 2026, 19:4713,375-12
18 Oct 2026, 23:0613,387-17
17 Oct 2026, 20:4813,404-13
16 Oct 2026, 17:2813,417first reading

Engagement

109 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
5.21%
avg views รท 13,229 subscribers
Avg views / post
690
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.05%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 109 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held109 (31 July 2026 โ€“ 4 November 2026)
Views total22,073
Reactions total893
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 17:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 53s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

3,573 reactions across 108 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค2,41367.5%
๐Ÿฅฐ43012.0%
๐Ÿ˜2256.30%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1233.44%
๐Ÿ’˜1183.30%
๐Ÿ“491.37%
๐Ÿ’‹491.37%
๐Ÿ˜451.26%
๐Ÿ˜˜340.952%
๐Ÿ‘€300.84%
๐ŸŒš290.812%
๐Ÿ•Š160.448%
๐Ÿ™Š110.308%
๐Ÿณ10.028%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 109 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 3,573 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 109 we hold a reading for ยท 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @Aya_2822. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 109 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegramโ€™s own โ€˜editedโ€™ marker: 0 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 17:38 UTC49 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

๐‘ถ๐’๐’† ๐’…๐’‚๐’šโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธ

โค3

Signed ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช ๐‘น๐’‚๐’‰๐’‚๐’‡ ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช

4 Nov 2026, 14:49 UTC182 views17 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

ุงู„ู‡ุฏูŠู‡ ุงู„ุจูŠุฑููŠูƒุช ๐Ÿฅฐโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธ๐ŸŒน

โค14๐Ÿฅฐ3

Signed ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช ๐‘น๐’‚๐’‰๐’‚๐’‡ ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช

4 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC188 views9 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

ุญุฑููŠุง ุงู†ุง ู„ูˆ ู…ู„ู‚ุชุด ุงู„ู…ูˆุตูุงุช ุฏูŠ ู‡ูุถู„ ู‚ุงุนุฏู‡ ููŠ ุจูŠุช ุงุจูˆูŠุง ุงุญุณู†๐Ÿ˜‚๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐Ÿซถ๐Ÿป

โค9

Signed ๐ธ๐‘›๐‘” ๐ด๐‘ฆ๐‘Ž โ„˜ .

4 Nov 2026, 05:56 UTC279 views14 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

ุฒูˆู‘ุฌูƒูู… ุงู„ู„ู‡ุŒ ูˆู…ูŽู†ูŽู‘ ุนู„ูŠูƒูู… ุจุงู„ุญูุจูู‘ ูˆุงู„ุฃูู†ุณูุŒ ูˆุฑุฒู‚ูƒูู… ุงู„ุจูŠูˆุช ุงู„ุฏุงูุฆุฉ ุงู„ู…ู„ูŠุฆุฉ ุจุงู„ุฐูƒุฑู ูˆุงู„ุฎูŠู‘ุฑุŒ ูˆูˆู‡ุจูƒูู… ุงู„ุฐู‘ุฑูŠุฉ ุงู„ุตู‘ุงู„ุญุฉ ุงู„ู…ูุตู„ุญุฉ ููŠ ุนููˆู ูˆุนุงููŠุฉ.. ูˆุฃู† ูŠูุฏุฎู„ูƒูู… ุงู„ุฌู†ู‘ุฉ ู†ุญู†ู ูˆุฅูŠู‘ุงูƒู… ููŠ ุฐู„ูƒ ูƒูู„ู‘ู‡.๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐Ÿซถ๐Ÿป

โค14

Signed ๐ธ๐‘›๐‘” ๐ด๐‘ฆ๐‘Ž โ„˜ .

3 Nov 2026, 21:23 UTC291 views10 reactionsread 4 November 2026

ููŠ ูˆุตูู ู„ุทูŠู ุนู† ุงู„ุฃูู„ูุฉู ุงู„ุชูŠ ู†ุดุนุฑ ุจู‡ุง ู…ุน ุดุฎุตู ู†ุญุจู‘ู‡ุŒ ู‚ูŠู„: ยซุญูŠู† ูƒูู†ุช ุจุตุญุจุชู‡ูุŒ ู„ู… ุฃูƒู† ุฃูู„ู‚ูŠ ุจุงู„ุงู‹ ุฃุจุฏู‹ุง ู„ูู…ุง ุฃู‚ูˆู„ุŒ ูƒุงู† ุงู„ุญูŽุฏูŠุซ ู…ุนู‡ ุณู„ุณู‹ุง ู…ูู† ุฏูˆู†ู ุฌูู‡ุฏ ูƒู…ุง ุงู„ุชู‘ู†ูุณ.ยป

๐Ÿ’‹7๐Ÿฅฐ3

Signed ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช ๐‘น๐’‚๐’‰๐’‚๐’‡ ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช

3 Nov 2026, 21:18 UTC312 views14 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

ุฃุฑูŠุฏ ุฃู† ูŠุญุจู†ูŠ ุจุนูŠู†ูŠู‡.. ๐Ÿซ€โค ูƒู€ูŠู€ูุŸ!

โค12๐Ÿฅฐ2

Signed ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช ๐‘น๐’‚๐’‰๐’‚๐’‡ ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช

3 Nov 2026, 21:13 UTC450 views15 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

ุชูŽู‚ุชุฑุจ ู…ูู†ู‘ููŠ ู„ูุชุฃู†ุณ ..ููŠูุตูŠุจูู†ููŠ ูˆู†ุณ ูŠูƒููŠู†ูŠ ุงู„ุนู…ุฑ ูƒูู„ู‡.๐Ÿค๐Ÿคโœจ

โค12๐Ÿฅฐ3

Signed ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช ๐‘น๐’‚๐’‰๐’‚๐’‡ ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช

3 Nov 2026, 19:10 UTC339 views24 reactionsread 4 November 2026

โ€ู†ูุณูŠ ุงุชุฌูˆุฒ ูˆุงุญุฏ ูŠูƒูˆู† ู…ุชุฑุจูŠ 50 ู…ุฑุฉ โ€ูˆ ุงุจู† ู†ุงุณ .. ูˆ ู‡ูˆ ูŠุญุจู†ูŠ ูˆ ุฃู‡ู„ู‡ ุจูŠุญุจูˆู†ูŠ โ€ูˆ ูŠูƒูˆู† supportive ูˆ ุจูŠุถุญูƒู†ูŠ .. ูˆ ุนู†ุฏู‡ ุงุฎู„ุงู‚ ูˆ ุจูŠุชู‚ูŠ ุฑุจู†ุง ููŠุง โ€ูˆ ู…ุฌุชู‡ุฏ ููŠ ุดุบู„ู‡ โ€ูˆ ูŠูƒูˆู† ุญุชูŠ ููŠ ุฎุตุงู…ู‡ ููŠ ุงุญุชุฑุงู… ูˆ ูˆุฏ ูˆุญุจ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐ŸคŽ๐Ÿซถ๐Ÿป

โค24

Signed ๐ธ๐‘›๐‘” ๐ด๐‘ฆ๐‘Ž โ„˜ .

3 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC364 views20 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

ุงู„ุงู‚ูŠู‡ ููŠู†ุŸ ุงู„ุดุงู„

๐Ÿ‘€12โค6๐ŸŒš2

Signed ๐ธ๐‘›๐‘” ๐ด๐‘ฆ๐‘Ž โ„˜ .

3 Nov 2026, 18:45 UTC373 views7 reactionsread 4 November 2026

ู…ู† ุงู„ู†ู‡ุงุฑุฏุฉ ููŠู‡ ูุฑุตู‡ ู„ุงูŠ ุญุฏ ููŠ ุงู„ุนุงู„ู… ุงู†ู‡ ูŠุฑูˆุญ ุนู…ุฑู‡ ุจุจู„ุงุด ุนู„ู‰ ุญุณุงุจ ุงู„ุณุนูˆุฏูŠู‡ ูˆูŠุฎุชุงุฑ ู…ุฑุงูู‚ ูŠุฑูˆุญ ู…ุนุงู‡ ู†ุฒู„ ุชุทุจูŠู‚ ู†ุณูƒ ูˆุงุนู…ู„ ุนู„ูŠู‡ ุงูƒูˆู†ุช ุนุงุฏูŠ .. ู‡ุชู„ุงู‚ูŠ ููŠู‡ ู…ุณุงุจู‚ุงุช ุนุจุงุฑู‡ ุนู† ุงุณุฆู„ู‡ ุชุฌุงูˆุจู‡ุง ุตุญ ูุชุฏุฎู„ ู‚ุฑุนู‡ .. ูˆู„ูˆ ุทู„ุน ุงุณู…ูƒ ุจุชุงุฎุฏ ุนู…ุฑู‡ ุจุจู„ุงุด ุดุงู…ู„ู‡ ูƒู„ ุญุงุฌู‡ ู…ู† ูˆุฒุงุฑุฉ ุงู„ุญุฌ ูˆุงู„ุนู…ุฑู‡ ุงู„ุณุนูˆุฏูŠู‡ ูŠุนู†ูŠ ู…ุณุงุจู‚ู‡ ุฑุณู…ูŠู‡ ูˆู…ุถู…ูˆู†ู‡ ุงู„ู…ุณุงุจู‚ู‡ ุจุฏุฃุช ู…ู† ูก ู†ูˆูู…ุจุฑ ู„ู…ุฏุฉ ูฃู  ูŠูˆู… ุงูˆ ูฅู  ูŠูˆู… ูˆ ูƒู„ ูŠูˆู… ูˆุงุญุฏ ุจุณ ู‡ูŠููˆุฒ ู„ูˆ ู…ุด ู‡ุชุฏุฎู„ ุจู„ุบ ุบูŠุฑูƒ ุงู„ู…ูˆุถูˆุน ุจุจู„ุงุด ูŠุนู†ูŠ ูุฑุตู‡ ูƒูˆูŠุณโ€ฆ

โค7

Signed ๐ธ๐‘›๐‘” ๐ด๐‘ฆ๐‘Ž โ„˜ .

3 Nov 2026, 13:52 UTC447 views21 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿ’œโœจ

โค20๐Ÿฅฐ1

Signed ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช ๐‘น๐’‚๐’‰๐’‚๐’‡ ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช

3 Nov 2026, 13:18 UTC462 views25 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

๐‘บ๐’‚๐’‡๐’†๐Ÿฅฐโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธ

๐Ÿ’˜21๐Ÿฅฐ4

Signed ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช ๐‘น๐’‚๐’‰๐’‚๐’‡ ๐“†ฉโ™ก๐“†ช

Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @Aya_2822. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 8 posts on @Aya_2822 as deleted โ€” posts this register held that were missing from the channelโ€™s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโ€™s public page, and when โ€” not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
29 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
21 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 01:56 UTCAnonymous Poll119 voters

ู…ูŠู† ุญุณ ุจุงู„ุฒู„ุฒุงู„ ๐Ÿฅน

  1. ุญุณูŠุช๐Ÿฅน๐ŸคŽ48%
  2. ูƒู†ุช ููŠ ุณุงุจุน ู†ูˆู…ู‡ ุงู„ุญู…ุฏู„ู„ู‡ ๐Ÿฅน๐Ÿ˜‚53%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ุงู„ู…ูุตุญู€ู โ‹ฎ ๐‘ด๐’๐’”๐’‰๐’‚๐’‡ ๐ŸคŽ๐Ÿ•‹"".โคน
@ttrtttrtt ยท 26,647
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 43 here โ€” alongside 42 others โ€” read 17 September 2026
ุฑุจู…ุง"possibly''.๐ŸคŽ๐Ÿ“œ
@M3i3x3 ยท 19,821
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here โ€” alongside 75 others โ€” read 28 September 2026
โ‹† ๐’…๐’Š๐’”๐’๐’š ๐’‘๐’๐’‚๐’๐’†๐’• ุŒ ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ”ฎโ†ป.
@qIIIIqII ยท 48,235
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 32 here โ€” alongside 31 others โ€” read 17 September 2026
ุฑููƒู€ู†ู‘ ู‡ูŽู€ุงุฏูุฆูฐ๐šฬธ".
@ROknhada295 ยท 21,246
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here โ€” alongside 68 others โ€” read 22 September 2026
ู…ูŠู…ุฒ ุŒ ุจูˆุณุชุงุช ุŒ ูƒุชุงุจุงุช
@iiriirir ยท 22,584
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 63 here โ€” alongside 62 others โ€” read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ŸคŽโ˜•โ€ (@Aya_2822), 13,229 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aya_2822.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.