Video message, posted without a caption
🔥9

Channel
@Azbeautyshcool
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,439subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001799209422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Azbeautyshcool |
| Description | Системное обучение косметологов Программы школы: https://azbeautyschool.ru Бесплатная школа: https://azbeautyschool.ru/freeschool Отзывы: https://t.me/kbo_reviews Тех поддержка: @azbschoolbot Основатель: Алифанова Валерия Геннадьевна #QFV5F |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Azbeautyshcool |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:26 | 14,439 | +7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:59 | 14,432 | +4 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:19 | 14,428 | +5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:31 | 14,423 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:39 | 14,427 | +4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:56 | 14,423 | +2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:11 | 14,421 | +7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:19 | 14,414 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:20 | 14,416 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 14,417 | +1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 14,416 | +9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:29 | 14,407 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:49 | 14,404 | +4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:15 | 14,400 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 14,396 | +1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 14,395 | -6 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:27 | 14,401 | +6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:37 | 14,395 | +1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:54 | 14,394 | +8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 14,386 | first reading |
55 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 55 (20 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,834 |
| Reactions total | 123 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 18:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
404 reactions across 41 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 300 | 74.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 64 | 15.8% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 7.67% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 1.49% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.495% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.248% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 404 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Azbeautyshcool. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥9
Коллеги, что мешает Вам внедрять новые методики и расширять свою практику после обучения?
The shares total 229%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Прошли обучение и не внедрили.. 62% косметологов не решаются работать в тех или иных зонах, даже пройдя множество обучений. Я читаю каждую вашу анкету 🙌🏻 и мне так хочется ответить каждому.. но анкеты анонимны )) поэтому отвечать буду здесь. У меня в копилке тоже есть техники, которые я не планирую вводить в практику, некоторые прям за гранью адекватности 😅 Но базовые вещи, без которых мы не сможем вести пациен…
🔥9
Коллеги, первый разбор👆🏻 Пишите, как Вам такой формат? Продолжаем? И если хотите обсудить свою ситуацию, или разобрать пациента, заполните анкету👇🏻 https://forms.gle/r6MbhF53sWDmUiKY6 Только так я пойму, какие темы интересны Вам а не мне ))
❤🔥15👍4🔥4👏2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥7🔥1
«Я хочу приподнять уголки губ». Ну что, коллеги, первый консилиум КБО объявляю открытым! Большинство в опросе 👆🏻готовы открыто писать в чате, вот и посмотрим) Перед Вами пациент с вполне конкретным запросом. Посмотрите внимательно на фото. Что Вы видите? С чего начнёте? Какую тактику предложите? И самое интересное — почему именно такую? А теперь объясню, почему выбрала этого пациента. Читаю Ваши ответы в анон…
🔥5
Posted without readable text
Коллеги, представьте ситуацию. Вы столкнулись с клиническим случаем, в котором не уверены в выборе тактики. В профессиональном чате есть опытные коллеги, у которых можно спросить совета. Вы напишете в чат? *Анонимный опрос. Только честно, вечером объясню, почему спрашиваю.
🔥5
Косметология без осложнений pinned a photo
Устроим консилиум? Добрый воскресный вечер) По традиции выходного дня, разбирала шкаф и нашла свой бейдж из БСМП) чуть поскучала, повспоминала, кстати последнее фото было сделано за 3 дня до родов, очень я любила ту свою работу.. И знаете, я поняла что там было самым ценным? Наше хирургическое отделение. Заведующий, старший ординатор, врачи, с которыми мы каждый день работали бок о бок. Примерно 35 человек. И …
🔥24❤🔥5
«Как можно выбирать точку для DAO по фотографии?!» Коллеги, недавно в инсте* я проводила опрос, он неожиданно набрал огромное количество просмотров и комментариев. https://www.instagram.com/p/Des9uonoYAw/?psln=eGVhdTkxZ292OG9n Это заставило меня приготовить ответ)) Поделюсь им с вами😉 Кстати, коллеги, которые написали, что без оценки мимики и индивидуальной анатомии невозможно выбрать точку инъекции, абсолютно…
👍15
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥14
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @Azbeautyshcool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Коллеги, что мешает Вам внедрять новые методики и расширять свою практику после обучения?
The shares total 229%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А Вы когда-нибудь отдельно изучали работу с шеей?
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Косметология без осложнений” (@Azbeautyshcool), 14,439 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Azbeautyshcool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.