Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for صلاحیت حرفه‌ای

Channel

صلاحیت حرفه‌ای

@AzmoonPCOir

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,602subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002020981234
TypeChannel
Username@AzmoonPCOir
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AzmoonPCOir

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,5723,6023,58730 August 2026 — 3,572 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,572 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,573 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,586 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,594 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,593 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,602 subscribers30 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 17 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,568–3,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 21:393,602+9
12 Sept 2026, 08:563,593-1
8 Sept 2026, 02:593,594+8
3 Sept 2026, 00:373,586+13
30 Aug 2026, 12:393,573+1
30 Aug 2026, 03:153,572no change
30 Aug 2026, 03:003,572first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

710 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20028.2%
👎17524.6%
👍12818.0%
👏7510.6%
🥴344.79%
😡324.51%
🙏192.68%
🤨192.68%
💯70.986%
👌50.704%
😐50.704%
🥰40.563%
😁20.282%
😢20.282%
🔥10.141%
🤔10.141%
🤷‍♀10.141%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 710 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2025 to 26 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Feb 2026, 19:18 UTC≈4,050 views31 reactionsread 30 August 2026

تفاوت «شغل» با «حرفه» در روان‌شناسی 🎓💎 آیا می‌دانستید در ادبیات آکادمیک، هر شغلی «حرفه» (Profession) محسوب نمی‌شود؟ یک روان‌شناس زمانی یک «متخصص حرفه‌ای» است که این چهار ویژگی را داشته باشد: ۱. دانش تخصصی: تسلط بر مجموعه‌ای از دانش‌های پیچیده. ۲. قضاوت: توانایی استفاده از دانش در موقعیت‌های متغیر (نه فقط انجام کارهای روتین) ۳. تعهد به رفاه عمومی: اولویت دادن به خیر و صلاح جامعه و مراجع. ۴. پایبندی به استانداردهای اخ

21👍5👏5

19 Feb 2026, 16:04 UTC≈4,460 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026

رضایت آگاهانه؛ یک فرم اداری یا یک پیمان اخلاقی؟ 📝🤝 تا به حال شده فرم «رضایت آگاهانه» رو صرفاً برای اینکه در پرونده باشه، جلوی مراجع بگذارید تا امضا کنه؟ در اخلاق مثبت، رضایت آگاهانه فراتر از «متن قانون» است؛ مهم «روح قانون» است. تفاوت در چیست؟ نگاه حداقلی (کف قانون): گرفتن یک امضا برای اینکه مراجع بعداً نتواند شکایت کند. نگاه اخلاق مثبت: تلاش ویژه برای اینکه مطمئن شویم مراجع واقعاً فرآیند درمان را فهمیده است و آگاه

8

15 Feb 2026, 18:14 UTC≈4,540 views14 reactionsread 30 August 2026

هوش مصنوعی؛ همکار یا رقیب؟ (مرز صلاحیت حرفه‌ای) 🤖💼 آیا ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی صلاحیت ما را زیر سؤال می‌برند؟ طبق پژوهش‌های جدید در سال ۲۰۲۵، مدل‌های زبانی بزرگ توانسته‌اند در کاهش علائم افسردگی و اضطراب خفیف به نتایجی مشابه درمانگران انسانی دست یابند. با این حال، منابع تأکید می‌کنند که اثربخشی هوش مصنوعی در موقعیت‌های پیچیده و بحرانی به شدت افت می‌کند. در حالی که درمانگران مجرب در ۹۳٪ مواقع به نشانه‌های بحرانی پاسخ در

8👏6

14 Feb 2026, 15:17 UTC≈3,980 views15 reactionsread 30 August 2026

📌چرا مرز مالی برای درمانگر هم به اندازه مراجع مهمه؟ «گاهی لغو شدن جلسه بدون اطلاع قبلی فقط یک بی‌نظمی ساده نیست…» یه نکته حرفه‌ای: «بی‌ثباتی در پرداخت و زمان‌بندی، رابطه درمانی رو برای هر دو طرف ناامن می‌کنه.» اخلاق حرفه‌ای یعنی احترام متقابل؛ نه فقط مراقبت از مراجع، بلکه مراقبت از رابطه درمانی. هم درمانگر مسئوله، هم مراجع. طبیعتاً اگر مراجع در شرایط دشوار مالی باشه، گفت‌وگو و توافق انسانی همیشه ممکنه و لازمه. مس

👍96

17 Sept 2025, 14:52 UTC≈8,220 views22 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

اطلاعیه مهم برای پذیرفته‌شدگان آزمون‌های صلاحیت حرفه‌ای روابط عمومی سازمان @AzmoonPCOir

19👍3

17 Sept 2025, 14:47 UTC≈10,200 views16 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

راهنمای مراحل ثبت درخواست پروانه اشتغال روانشناسان و مشاوران از طریق درگاه ملی مجوزها @AzmoonPCOir

9👍7

17 Sept 2025, 14:13 UTC≈6,160 views22 reactionsread 30 August 2026

نتایج سومین دوره آزمون صلاحیت اعلام شد نمره قبولی 45.19 تعیین شده است برای دیدن نتایج سیستم کارنامه آزمون صلاحیت حرفه ای روانشناسان و مشاوران 1404 https://share.google/eUB8v1i2jwfDEcyyO @AzmoonPCOir

16👍4👏2

30 Jul 2025, 10:44 UTC≈7,530 views96 reactionsread 30 August 2026

🎓 گاهی فکر می‌کنیم وقتی امتحان بدیم و قبول بشیم، دیگه روان‌شناسِ "دارای صلاحیت" شدیم. اما بذار یه چیزی از خودمون بپرسم: آیا می‌تونی وقتی خسته‌ای، بازم فعالانه گوش بدی؟ آیا می‌تونی بین احساسات شخصی، به اخلاق حرفه‌ای پایبند بمونی؟ می‌تونی به مراجعی که احساس خوبی بهش نداری هم احترام حرفه‌ای بذاری؟ اینا رو کسی امتحان نمی‌گیره. ولی شاید اینا، امتحانای اصلی‌ان. 📍 بخشی از صلاحیت حرفه‌ای یعنی: "خودت رو بشناسی، محدودی

👏52👍2111👎7👌5

29 Jul 2025, 10:02 UTC≈6,010 views26 reactionsread 30 August 2026

درخواست ارائه رهنمودها از رییس جمهور؟

🤨19😐4👍2😡1

29 Jul 2025, 10:00 UTC≈5,440 views9 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @pcoiran_officialPhoto

🔰گزارش رئیس سازمان نظام روان‌شناسی و مشاوره به رئیس‌جمهور 🔶️به گزارش روابط‌عمومی سازمان، دکتر محمد حاتمی، رئیس سازمان نظام روان‌شناسی و مشاوره، طی نامه‌ای به محضر ریاست محترم جمهوری اسلامی ایران، گزارشی از اقدامات انجام‌شده پیرامون استقرار ارکان دوره چهارم سازمان و برگزاری انتخابات شورای مرکزی و هیات بازرسان در تاریخ ۱۸ مهر ۱۴۰۴ ارائه داد. 🔹️در این نامه، دکتر حاتمی ضمن تشریح روند قانونی طی‌شده برای برگزاری انتخابات

👎61🤷‍♀1😐1

26 Jul 2025, 13:44 UTC≈4,380 views40 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @pcoiran_officialPhoto

🔰اطلاعیه "قابل توجه شرکت‌کنندگان در سومین آزمون صلاحیت حرفه‌ای" 🔶️با تبریک به مناسبت برگزاری موفق سومین آزمون صلاحیت حرفه‌ای روان‌شناسان و مشاوران، به آگاهی می‌رساند: 🔹️آزمون مذکور پیش از استقرار مسئولان جدید سازمان، از نظر محتوای سؤالات و سایر امور اجرایی، با همکاری و توافق با سازمان سنجش آموزش کشور برنامه‌ریزی شده بود. 🔹️با این حال، مسئولان جدید تلاش کردند تا سؤالاتی که ارتباط مستقیمی با ارزیابی صلاحیت حرفه‌ای ن

👎259👍4👏2

26 Jul 2025, 07:41 UTC≈4,090 views193 reactionsread 30 August 2026

واقعا عمدتاً ابراز رضایت کردید؟

👎126😡31🥴23👍11🔥1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AzmoonPCOir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

استخدام روانشناسان و مشاوران
@estekhdam_psy · 21,894
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 September 2026
استخدام روانشناسی ومشاوره کشور
@psy_estekhdami · 23,284
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 September 2026
جارچی روانشناسی:اخبار-استخدامی.کارگاه
@salimigroup1394 · 21,953
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“صلاحیت حرفه‌ای” (@AzmoonPCOir), 3,602 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AzmoonPCOir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.